This prospective, multicenter observational study aims to evaluate the effect of different flow rates of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) on the quality of the laryngoscopic view during videolaryngoscopy in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia. Each patient will serve as their own control, with repeated measurements obtained at three different HFNO flow settings (0, 40, and 60 L/min). The study will assess objective and subjective parameters of glottic visualization using standardized scoring systems.
Anaesthetic management Anaesthesia induction and airway management will be standardized as far as clinically feasible. Standard monitoring will be applied according to institutional practice. Preoxygenation will be performed using high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO). General anaesthesia will be induced using standard intravenous agents, followed by administration of neuromuscular blockade to facilitate laryngoscopy. Mask ventilation will be performed as clinically indicated. Videolaryngoscopy will be performed using a standardized device and blade type whenever possible. All procedures will be performed by anesthesiologists experienced in videolaryngoscopy. Study procedure After induction of anaesthesia and achievement of adequate conditions for laryngoscopy, videolaryngoscopy will be performed. During a single laryngoscopic sequence, images of the laryngeal view will be obtained under three predefined HFNO flow conditions: * 0 L/min * 40 L/min * 60 L/min At each flow level, once a stable laryngeal view will be achieved, a still image will be captured using the videolaryngoscope recording system. The laryngoscope position will be maintained as stable as possible during acquisition of all three images. No attempt at tracheal intubation will be made during image acquisition. After completion of the image capture protocol, tracheal intubation will be performed according to standard clinical practice. All images will be anonymized and stored for subsequent offline analysis. Image assessment Captured images will be evaluated offline by an independent anesthesiologist blinded to HFNO flow rates and patient identity. Where applicable, evaluation will be performed by more than one assessor to allow assessment of inter-rater agreement. Each image will be assessed using predefined objective and subjective measures (Percentage of Glottic Opening, Likert scale).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
150
Different flows will be applied to patients undergoing general anaesthesia during airway management. In this arm flow will be 0 l/min. During these flows images will be captured using videolaryngoscope.
Different flows will be applied to patients undergoing general anaesthesia during airway management. In this arm flow will 40 l/min. During these flows images will be captured using videolaryngoscope.
Different flows will be applied to patients undergoing general anaesthesia during airway management. In this arm flow will 60 l/min. During these flows images will be captured using videolaryngoscope.
Quality of view
Percentage of glottic opening (POGO score) assessed from recorded videolaryngoscopic images.
Time frame: From induction of general anesthesia to completion of orotracheal intubation (not longer than 10 minutes).
Cormack-Lehane classification
Ordinal grading of glottic view using Cormack- Lehane classification.
Time frame: From induction of general anesthesia to completion of orotracheal intubation (not longer than 10 minutes).
Subjective image quality (Likert scale)
Subjective assessment of laryngoscopic image quality rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) by independent evaluators blinded to HFNO flow conditions
Time frame: From induction of general anesthesia to completion of orotracheal intubation (not longer than 10 minutes).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.