This phase II trial tests the effect of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) in combination with fludarabine and melphalan as conditioning regimen in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome that has not responded to previous treatment (refractory) and that has come back after a period of improvement (relapsed) and are undergoing a donor (allogeneic) peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) from a matched related or unrelated donor. HCT is the only curative treatment for high-risk patients, but the side effects related to the current conditioning treatments limit the use to younger and more fit patients. TMLI is a targeted form of total body radiation that uses intensity-modulated radiation therapy to target marrow, lymph node chains, and the spleen. It is designed to reduce radiation-associated side effects and maximize the radiation therapeutic effect. Fludarabine blocks cells from making deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and may kill cancer cells. It is a type of purine antagonist and a type of ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor. Melphalan is in a class of medications called alkylating agents. It may kill cancer cells by damaging their DNA and stopping them from dividing. Giving chemotherapy, such as fludarabine and melphalan, and TMLI before an allogeneic transplant helps kill cancer cells in the body and helps make room in the patient's bone marrow for new blood-forming cells (stem cells to grow. When healthy stem cells from a related or unrelated donor, such as PBSC HCT, that closely match the patient's blood, are infused into a patient, they may help the patient's bone marrow make more healthy cells and platelets, an may help destroy any remaining cancer cells. Giving TMLI in combination with fludarabine and melphalan as conditioning treatment for an allogeneic PBSC HCT from a matched related or unrelated donor may be safe, tolerable, and/or effective in treating high-risk older patients with relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Assess the efficacy of the total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI)-based therapy at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 1600 cGy prior to hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for older patients (≥ 50 years of age) with refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) HCT from matched related/unrelated donor, as measured by 2-years leukemia-free survival (LFS). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Further evaluation of safety of the TMLI-based conditioning regimen, by assessing the following: type, frequency, severity, attribution, time course and duration of adverse events, including acute/chronic GVHD, infection and delayed engraftment. II. Estimate overall survival (OS: at 1 and 2 years post-HCT), cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse/progression (at 1 and 2 years post-HCT), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days, 1 year and 2 years post-HCT. III. Estimate the cumulative incidence and severity of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by day 180 using Malignant Germ Cell International Consortium (MAGIC) grading and chronic GVHD by 1 and 2 years post-HCT using National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria. IV. Estimate the cumulative incidence of GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 1-year post-HCT. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. Collect longitudinal blood samples for immune analysis II. Collect longitudinal blood samples to assess presence and levels of GVHD biomarkers and inflammatory cytokines III. Collect longitudinal bone marrow samples to assess changes in the bone marrow environment after TMLI. IV. Collect longitudinal blood samples for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling. V. Collect longitudinal stool samples to explore the potential effects of lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract radiation exposure on microbiome composition and HCT outcomes. VI. In patients ≥ 50 years old, evaluate physical function and quality of life and cognitive impairment using Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) assessments at baseline then frailty assessments, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Physical Function and Montreal cognitive assessment on day 100 and 180-, and 1-year post-HCT. OUTLINE: Patients receive palifermin intravenously (IV) on days -11, -10, -9, 0, 1 and 2, fludarabine IV on days -4 to -2 and melphalan IV on day -2 and undergo TMLI twice daily (BID) for 8 fractions on days -8 to -5. Patients receive allogeneic PBSC-HCT on day 0. Starting on day -1, patients also receive tacrolimus IV or orally (PO) once daily (QD) and sirolimus QD per standard of care. Additionally, patients undergo echocardiography or multigated acquisition scan (MUGA), computed tomography (CT), urine and blood sample collection, and bone marrow biopsy throughout the study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30, 60, 100 and 180 days and at 1 and 2 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
35
Undergo urine and blood sample collection
Undergo bone marrow biopsy
Undergo CT
Undergo echocardiography
Given IV
Given IV
Undergo MUGA
Given IV
Undergo allogeneic PBSC HCT
Ancillary studies
Given sirolimus
Given IV or PO
Undergo TMLI
City of Hope Medical Center
Duarte, California, United States
Leukemia-free survival
Will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals will be provided.
Time frame: From the date of stem cell infusion to the date of first observation of relapse/progression, or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed at 2 years post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)
Incidence of adverse events (AEs)
Will be scored on both the Bearman Scale and National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0. Will be summarized by type, attribution, grade and duration.
Time frame: From day 1 of protocol therapy up to day 30 post-HCT
Incidence of highest grades of AEs
Will be scored on both the Bearman Scale and NCI CTCAE v 5.0. Will be summarized by type, attribution, grade and duration.
Time frame: From day 31 up to day 100 post-HCT
Overall survival
Will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals will be provided.
Time frame: From date of stem cell infusion t the date of death, assessed at 1 and 2 years post-HCT
Relapse
The cumulative incidence of will be calculated using the competing risk method as described by Gooley et al. (1999). Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals will be provided for each outcome measure.
Time frame: From date of stem cell infusion to first observation of relapse/progression, assessed at 1 and 2 years post-HCT
Non-relapse mortality
The cumulative incidence of will be calculated using the competing risk method as described by Gooley et al. (1999). Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals will be provided for each outcome measure.
Time frame: From date of stem cell infusion until non-disease related death, assessed at 100 days, and at 1 and 2 years post-HCT
Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)
Will be graded according to the 1994 Keystone Consensus Grading. The cumulative incidence of will be calculated using the competing risk method as described by Gooley et al. (1999). Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals will be provided for each outcome measure.
Time frame: From date of stem cell infusion to document/biopsy proven acute GVHD onset date, assessed up to 180 days post-transplant
Chronic GVHD
Will be scored according to Jagasia et al. The cumulative incidence of will be calculated using the competing risk method as described by Gooley et al. (1999). Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals will be provided for each outcome measure.
Time frame: From approximately 80-100 days post-transplant to the documented/biopsy proven chronic GVHD onset date, assessed at 1 and 2 years
GVHD-free and relapse-free survival
Will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals will be provided.
Time frame: From the date of stem cell infusion to garde 3-4 acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemic treatment, relapse/progression, whichever comes first, assessed at 1 year post-HCT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.