The goal of this clinical trial is to: 1\) evaluate the feasibility of conducting decentralized clinical trials (DCT) in collaboration with community resources; 2) test the reliability of a self-developed Digital Platform for Decentralized Clinical Trials (DP-DCT); and 3) compare the effect of two different glucose monitoring methods on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The study population consists of adults with T2DM who do not have acute diabetic complications. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is it feasible to conduct a DCT in collaboration with community settings across key steps such as participant recruitment, informed consent, drug delivery, and remote monitoring? Can the DP-DCT platform reliably achieve full electronic integration from participant recruitment to statistical reporting, and automatically generate verified electronic copies of key source data in real time? In patients taking dapagliflozin, does continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) lead to a higher rate of glycemic control target achievement compared to traditional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG)? Researchers will compare the CGM group (dapagliflozin + CGM) and the SMBG group (dapagliflozin + SMBG) to see if there is a difference in the rate of achieving glycemic control targets after 12 weeks of treatment. Participants will: Wear a blinded CGM device for 7days before starting treatment (run-in period) to assess eligibility for randomization. Take dapagliflozin (10 mg once daily) and maintain healthy lifestyle habits. Monitor their blood glucose using either a CGM device or a traditional glucose meter according to their group assignment. Wear a smart bracelet and use a smart weight scale, with all data automatically uploaded via the DP-DCT platform. Wear a blinded CGM device again for 7 days after the 12-week treatment period (follow-up period). Complete most study procedures (including informed consent, drug receipt, and follow-up communication) through an online platform without frequent hospital visits, with some tasks supported by community hospitals.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
120
10mg,qd
used in Group A, Open-label continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for glucose monitoring
Fingertip self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) using glucometer
Proportion of Participants Completing All DCT Procedures from Remote Informed Consent to Last Visit
Proportion of enrolled participants who successfully complete all predefined decentralized clinical trial (DCT) procedures, including remote informed consent, electronic data capture, device connectivity, direct-to-patient drug delivery, scheduled follow-ups, and last study visit.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
Reliability Evaluation
Implementation Rate of the DP-DCT Platform Function List: A digital intelligent clinical research platform that achieves full-process digitalization from participant recruitment to statistical reporting, along with technologies such as real-time generation of certified electronic copies of key data, must possess the following functions and meet the relevant assessment indicators.
Time frame: From study start to study completion (up to 24 months)
Clinical Study Evaluation Indicators
Difference between the two groups in the change of HbA1c from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment. Change from baseline/run-in period in Time in Range (TIR, 3.9-10 mmol/L) between the two groups.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Key Secondary Outcome Measure: HbA1c Key Secondary Outcome Measure
Proportion of participants in each group with HbA1c \<7% after 12 weeks of treatment.
Time frame: Week 12
Key Secondary Outcome Measure: HbA1c Key Secondary Outcome Measure
Proportion of participants in each group with HbA1c \<6.5% after 12 weeks of treatment.
Time frame: week 12
Key Secondary Outcome Measure: HbA1c Key Secondary Outcome Measure
Proportion of participants in each group with a reduction in HbA1c of ≥0.5% from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment.
Time frame: week 12
Key Secondary Outcome Measure: HbA1c Key Secondary Outcome Measure
Proportion of participants in each group with a reduction in HbA1c of ≥1% from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment.
Time frame: week 12
Key Secondary Outcome Measure: HbA1c Key Secondary Outcome Measure
Proportion of participants in each group with either a reduction in HbA1c of ≥1% from baseline or an HbA1c \<7.0% after 12 weeks of treatment.
Time frame: week 12
Key Secondary Outcome Measure: HbA1c Key Secondary Outcome Measure
Change from baseline in fasting serum glucose (FPG) after 12 weeks of treatment.
Time frame: week 12
Key Secondary Outcome Measure: HbA1c Key Secondary Outcome Measure: CGM Metrics
Change from baseline/run-in period to the CGM follow-up period in Time Above Range (TAR, ≥10 mmol/L) between the two groups.
Time frame: week 12
Key Secondary Outcome Measure: HbA1c Key Secondary Outcome Measure: CGM Metrics
Change from baseline/run-in period to the CGM follow-up period in Time Below Range (TBR, \<3.9 mmol/L) between the two groups.
Time frame: week 12
Key Secondary Outcome Measure: HbA1c Key Secondary Outcome Measure: CGM Metrics
Comparison of the coefficient of variation (CV) of glucose
Time frame: week 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.