This study evaluates the feasibility and fidelity of an opportunistic atrial fibrillation (AF) screening programme conducted in 38 community pharmacies in Seville (Spain), using the Kardias® 6-lead portable ECG device, coordinated with the emergency medical services centre Salud Responde (CES 061) and primary care physicians. Eligible participants are individuals aged 65 years or older without a prior AF diagnosis who attend a participating pharmacy for any routine purpose. The screening consists of a 30-second ECG recording performed by a trained community pharmacist. Positive or indeterminate results are transmitted in real time to Salud Responde for clinical validation and referral to primary care. The study is evaluated using the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance). The primary outcome is protocol fidelity, measured by the Implementation Adherence Grade (IAG). The study is part of the NUMAPLUS project, funded by INTERREG VI-A España-Portugal (POCTEP 2021-2027), co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
STUDY DESIGN This is a prospective, single-cohort, type-1 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study conducted within the NUMAPLUS project (INTERREG VI-A España-Portugal, POCTEP 2021-2027, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund). This design was selected because external evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of the Kardias® device is sufficient to justify its deployment, while uncertainty persists regarding the organisational conditions, care pathways and economic incentives required for its sustainable integration into the Andalusian community pharmacy network. The primary focus is on implementation outcomes; clinical outcomes related to atrial fibrillation screening are collected as secondary endpoints. The study is reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) guideline. SETTING The study is conducted in 38 community pharmacies in the province of Seville affiliated with the Real e Ilustre Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos de Sevilla (RICOFS), selected by voluntary participation following an open invitation. Eligibility criteria for pharmacies required stable internet connectivity for access to the Numaplus application, completion of pre-study training, and absence of concurrent participation in another cardiovascular screening programme. Priority was given to pharmacies with 24-hour or 12-hour opening schedules. Geographic coverage targets at least three urban health zones per province and at least one semi-urban or rural zone per healthcare management area. The study articulates three coordination levels: (1) the community pharmacy as the point of patient recruitment and screening; (2) Salud Responde (CES 061) as the clinical validation, risk stratification and real-time coordination node; and (3) the primary care physician as the responsible party for definitive diagnosis and initiation of treatment. TRAINING OF PARTICIPATING PHARMACISTS Prior to the recruitment period, all enrolled pharmacists completed a structured training programme accredited by the Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP) and the Agencia de Calidad Sanitaria de Andalucía (ACSA). The programme was delivered entirely online in asynchronous modality between 23 March and 13 April 2026 (10 hours total) through the EASP Moodle platform. It comprised four learning units: (1) epidemiological basis and scientific rationale for opportunistic AF screening; (2) detection protocol, radial pulse palpation technique, and interpretation of Kardias® device outputs; (3) data entry in the Numaplus platform, risk classification and patient communication within the pharmacy-Salud Responde circuit; and (4) ethical and legal framework, informed consent procedures, and data protection requirements. Certification required completion of all practical activities and a minimum score of 7 out of 10 on the final knowledge assessment. INTERVENTION The screening protocol comprises five sequential operational phases aligned with the RE-AIM framework: Phase 1 (Reach): Opportunistic invitation during dispensing or consultation, without prior appointment. The pharmacist records the monthly denominator of unique patients aged 65 years or older using pharmacy management software. Reasons for refusal are recorded anonymously. Phase 2 (Adoption): Following written informed consent, the case is opened in the Numaplus application. The pharmacist records current symptoms (palpitations, chest pain, dyspnoea, syncope), oral anticoagulant therapy status, and the CHA₂DS₂-VA score (0-6), adopted per the 2024 ESC Guidelines for AF Management in replacement of CHA₂DS₂-VASc. Phase 3 (Implementation): The Kardias® 6-lead portable device is applied for a 30-second ECG recording (maximum 3 attempts). The device algorithm classifies the result as: Suspected AF / Sinus rhythm / Bradycardia / Tachycardia / Unclassified. Protocol fidelity is operationalised through the Implementation Adherence Grade (IAG). A performance-based financial incentive of 20 euros per complete and valid case is applied. Phase 4 (Effectiveness): In case of suspected or indeterminate AF, the Numaplus platform automatically transmits a PDF containing the ECG tracing and clinical data to Salud Responde; simultaneously, the pharmacist places a direct call. The Salud Responde nurse applies a structured triage protocol: emergency 061 activation (heart rate \>110 or \<60 bpm or alarm symptoms), medium priority referral (haemodynamically stable suspected AF, primary care appointment within 72 hours), or low priority referral (unclassified tracing, scheduled ECG at primary care). Definitive AF diagnosis is confirmed by the primary care physician. Phase 5 (Maintenance): Six-month telephone follow-up conducted by Salud Responde, assessing anticoagulation initiation and adherence, health-related quality of life (visual analogue scale 0-10), and major adverse events (ischaemic stroke, major bleeding, death). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary analysis is precision-based, targeting 385 participants (operational target: 380, 10 per pharmacy). Categorical variables are reported as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (Clopper-Pearson); the IAG is estimated with an exact binomial 95% CI. Factors associated with low fidelity are explored by logistic regression. Missing data are handled by multiple imputation (MICE, 20 imputations) if below 15% under the MAR assumption. All analyses are conducted in R version 4.3 or higher.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
380
A coordinated opportunistic screening model integrating community pharmacies, emergency medical services (Salud Responde, CES 061) and primary care physicians. The model comprises: opportunistic patient identification during routine pharmacy visits; 30-second ECG recording using the Kardias 6-lead portable device; real-time data transmission via the Numaplus platform; structured clinical triage by Salud Responde nursing staff; and referral to primary care for definitive diagnosis and treatment. Implementation strategies include a structured EASP-accredited online training programme, ongoing technical support, activity feedback reports and a performance-based financial incentive of 20 euros per complete valid case.
Centro de Emergencias Sanitarias 061
Seville, SEVILLA, Spain
Implementation Adherence Grade (IAG)
Implementation Adherence Grade (IAG) Composite fidelity index expressed as the percentage of mandatory protocol items completed per screening case, calculated as (number of mandatory items completed / 5) × 100. The five mandatory items, each scored dichotomously as completed (1) or not completed (0) and weighted equally, are: (1) written informed consent obtained and documented; (2) minimum demographic data recorded; (3) complete CHA₂DS₂-VA score calculated; (4) successful 30-second ECG tracing obtained within a maximum of three attempts; and (5) documented contact with Salud Responde for all cases classified as suspected or indeterminate atrial fibrillation. The pharmacy-level and study-level IAG is the mean of individual case-level IAG values. Target value: ≥90%. Unit of Measure: Percentage of mandatory protocol items completed (single composite index).
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Participation rate (Reach)
Proportion of patients aged 65 years or older who accept screening divided by the monthly denominator of unique patients aged 65 years or older attending each pharmacy.
Time frame: Monthly, through study completion, an average of 6 months
Pharmacy-level adoption rate
Number of pharmacies completing at least one valid screening divided by the number of invited pharmacies.
Time frame: At end of recruitment period (month 6)
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) score
Mean score of the 4-item AIM scale (range 1-5) measuring pharmacist acceptability of the screening programme.
Time frame: At end of recruitment period (month 6)
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) score
Mean score of the 4-item FIM scale (range 1-5) measuring pharmacist-perceived feasibility of the screening programme.
Time frame: At end of recruitment period (month 6)
Suspected AF detection rate.
Proportion of screened participants with Suspected AF classification by the Kardias device algorithm.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Confirmed AF diagnosis rate.
Proportion of screened participants with confirmed AF diagnosis following primary care assessment.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Linkage to Care rate
Proportion of participants with suspected or indeterminate AF who attend primary care appointment within the planned timeframe.
Time frame: Up to 72 hours after positive or indeterminate screening result
Oral anticoagulation initiation rate
proportion of participants with confirmed AF initiated on oral anticoagulation.
Time frame: Up to 6 months after confirmed AF diagnosis
Major adverse events at 6 months
Incidence of ischaemic stroke, major bleeding and death among participants with confirmed AF at 6-month follow-up.
Time frame: 6 months after confirmed AF diagnosis
Refusal rate and reasons
proportion of eligible patients who decline screening, with the main reason for refusal recorded anonymously.
Time frame: Monthly, through study completion, an average of 6 months
Programme sustainability intention
Proportion of pharmacists reporting intention to continue the screening programme beyond project funding period, assessed through the sustainability block of the post-study questionnaire.
Time frame: At end of recruitment period (month 6)
Salud Responde coordination performance
Operational indicators of the Salud Responde (CES 061) triage node, including median time from ECG transmission to clinical validation, distribution of triage decisions (emergency 061 activation, medium priority referral, low priority referral), and qualitative assessment of circuit barriers by the SR coordination team at end of study.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
13a. Salud Responde Coordination. ECG transmission.
Median time from ECG transmission to Salud Responde clinical validation (minutes)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Salud Responde coordination. Triage decission
Distribution of Salud Responde triage decisions (percentage of cases in each category: emergency 061 activation / medium priority / low priority)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
SR circuit barrers
Qualitative assessment of circuit barriers by Salud Responde coordination team (thematic categories)
Time frame: At end of study (month 6)
Jesús Antonio JC Carrillo-Castrillo, PhD
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.