This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of three treatment strategies (Anticoagulation, Thrombolysis, and Mechanical Thrombectomy) for patients with intermediate-high risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) in a real-world setting. Approximately 1,300 patients will be enrolled across multiple centers in China. Patients will be followed for 90 days to assess mortality, heart function recovery, bleeding risks, and quality of life. The results will help guide personalized treatment decisions and healthcare policy.
Background: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a severe manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Intermediate-high risk PE accounts for 20-30% of all PE cases with significant mortality driven by right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation for all, with thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy as rescue or alternative therapies. However, there is significant heterogeneity in real-world treatment selection and a lack of head-to-head comparative evidence among the three strategies in complex real-world populations. Objective: To compare the 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality and 48-hour RV/LV ratio improvement rate among three treatment strategies (Anticoagulation, Thrombolysis, Mechanical Thrombectomy) in patients with intermediate-high risk acute PE. Design: This is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, pragmatic cohort study. Treatment allocation is based on routine clinical decision-making (natural allocation) without investigator intervention. Advanced statistical methods (Propensity Score Matching/Weighting, Instrumental Variable analysis) will be used to control for confounding factors. Participants: 1,300 patients with confirmed acute intermediate-high risk PE (RV/LV ratio ≥0.9 and elevated cardiac biomarkers, hemodynamically stable). There are no age limits to reflect real-world diversity. Interventions/Exposures: 1. Anticoagulation (AC): Standard anticoagulant therapy (LMWH, DOAC, UFH, or Warfarin). 2. Thrombolysis (TL): Systemic thrombolysis or Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (CDT) using agents like Urokinase, Alteplase, etc. 3. Mechanical Thrombectomy (MT): Mechanical removal of thrombus using FDA/NMPA approved devices (e.g., Indigo, FlowTriever, Acoscream), with or without adjunctive anticoagulation/thrombolysis. Outcomes: * Primary: 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality; 48-hour RV/LV ratio improvement rate (≥15% reduction). * Secondary: Clinical deterioration, major bleeding (ISTH/GUSTO/BARC), functional status (6MWT, NYHA, PVFS), quality of life (PEmb-QoL, EQ-5D-5L), PE recurrence, and healthcare resource utilization. Follow-up: Patients will be followed at 48 hours, 7 days, 30 days, and 90 days.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,300
Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH), Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC), Unfractionated Heparin (UFH), or Warfarin according to guideline-standard regimens.
Urokinase, Pro-urokinase, Alteplase, or Tenecteplase administered systemically or via catheter.
Any FDA/NMPA approved mechanical thrombectomy device (e.g., Indigo, FlowTriever, Acoscream) used for clot removal.
Nanjing First Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
All-Cause Mortality at 30 Days
The percentage of participants who die from any cause within 30 days of enrollment.
Time frame: 30 days
All-Cause Mortality at 90 Days
The percentage of participants who die from any cause within 90 days of enrollment.
Time frame: 90 days
Right Ventricular to Left Ventricular (RV/LV) Ratio Improvement Rate at 48 Hours
The proportion of participants with a reduction in RV/LV ratio ≥15% from baseline measured by CTPA or Echocardiography.
Time frame: 48 hours ± 6 hours
Major Bleeding Events
Incidence of major bleeding defined by ISTH, GUSTO, or BARC criteria (including intracranial hemorrhage).
Time frame: 48 hours, 7 days, 30 days, 90 days
Clinical Deterioration
Composite of hemodynamic instability, need for rescue therapy (escalation to thrombolysis/MT/ECMO), intubation, or PE-related death.
Time frame: 48 hours, 7 days
6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
Change in walking distance from baseline (estimated) to follow-up. Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) ≥30 meters.
Time frame: 30 days, 90 days
Post-VTE Functional Status (PVFS) Score
Assessment of functional limitation due to VTE (Scale 0-5).
Time frame: 30 days, 90 days
Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL)
The questionnaire consists of 9 questions containing 40 items, which are organized into 6 domains: Frequency of Complaints (FC): Assesses the frequency of respiratory and general symptoms (e.g., dyspnea, chest pain). Daily Activity Limitations (AL): Measures limitations in performing activities of daily living (ADL). Work-related Problems (WP): Evaluates difficulties in performing work or school duties. Social Limitations (SL): Assesses restrictions on social activities. Intensity of Complaints (IC): Measures the severity of pain and breathlessness. Emotional Complaints (EC): Captures anxiety, frustration, and fear related to the disease.
Time frame: 90 days
Symptomatic PE Recurrence
Confirmed recurrent PE via CTPA or V/Q scan.
Time frame: 90 days
ICU Length of Stay
Duration of intensive care unit stay during the index hospitalization
Time frame: From ICU admission to ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days
Total Hospital Length of Stay
Duration of index hospitalization from emergency department admission to hospital discharge
Time frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days
Total Medical Costs
Direct medical costs incurred during index hospitalization and within 90 days of enrollment, including medications, procedures, and hospitalization
Time frame: Through 90 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.