Active Versus Passive Anal Sphincter Training in Patients With Fecal Incontinence

Overview

Fecal incontinence is a disabling condition that can substantially impair quality of life. This study evaluates whether home-based anal electrical stimulation combined with active voluntary anal sphincter contraction is superior to electrical stimulation alone in patients with fecal incontinence. The study is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open-label controlled trial. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either electrical stimulation with synchronized active sphincter contraction or electrical stimulation alone. The primary outcome is the change in Vaizey/St. Mark's Incontinence Score from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcomes include fecal incontinence episodes, quality of life, anorectal manometry parameters, adherence, safety, and sustained response during follow-up.

This prospective randomized controlled trial will compare two home-based rehabilitation approaches for fecal incontinence. Eligible adult patients with urge, passive, or mixed fecal incontinence will be enrolled at study site: University Hospital Martin, Slovakia. Possibility to incorporate another study centre with be allowed. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment arms. In the active treatment arm, participants will use anal electrical stimulation combined with active voluntary anal sphincter contraction. Electrical stimulation will be delivered using the commercially available NeuroTrac Continence device with a frequency of 40 Hz, pulse width of 250 µs, 5-second ON and 10-second OFF cycles, 1-second ramp-up, and a session duration of 25 minutes. Stimulation intensity will be adjusted by the patient up to the maximum tolerable level without pain. Participants will be instructed to perform a maximum voluntary anal sphincter contraction for 5 seconds at the start of each stimulation ON cycle and to relax during the rest phase. In the control intervention arm, participants will use identical electrical stimulation parameters but will remain relaxed during stimulation and will not perform active voluntary sphincter contractions. Both groups will receive standardized patient education, including device training and written instructions. The intervention period will last 12 weeks. Study assessments will include the Vaizey/St. Mark's Incontinence Score, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale, 14-day bowel diary, adherence assessment, adverse event monitoring, and high-resolution anorectal manometry. Optionally patients will be also assessed by endoanal ultrasound to detect possible structural abnormalities where clinical suspicion of these will be present. Assessments will be performed at baseline, week 12, and week 36 (as a post treatment follow up), with interim phone or secure online follow-up for adherence and safety. The primary endpoint is the mean change in Vaizey/St. Mark's Incontinence Score from baseline to week 12. Secondary endpoints include changes in weekly fecal incontinence episodes, FIQL subscales, anorectal manometry parameters, treatment adherence, adverse events, and sustained clinical improvement during follow-up.