This study examines how population-based screening for type 1 diabetes (T1D) using islet autoantibodies (i.e., immune system proteins) can be incorporated into pediatric primary care during routine well-child visits. The project evaluates whether this screening approach is feasible, acceptable, and appropriate for clinicians, parents, and other key constituent groups. The study also explores how often clinicians order the test and how often families complete it when integrated into existing workflows. Insights from parents, clinicians, and organizational leaders will inform future scale-up efforts and practical strategies to improve early detection of T1D in pediatric practices across the United States.
Background: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is the most common form of diabetes in children and adolescents, affecting approximately 1 in 300 young people in the United States. The disease results from autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β-cells and often progresses silently over months to years before clinical symptoms emerge. Although first-degree relatives have a substantially higher risk of developing T1D, most children diagnosed with T1D do not have a family history of the disease. The presence of multiple islet autoantibodies is associated with an almost certain lifetime risk of insulin-requiring diabetes, and early identification before symptom onset can significantly reduce rates of life-threatening diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), support structured monitoring, and potentially allow for disease-modifying interventions. Despite clear benefits, early detection through autoantibody screening is not routinely implemented in U.S. pediatric primary care. Currently, screening largely occurs in research settings, and little is known about how best to integrate universal T1D screening into busy community pediatric practices. Key concerns include workflow burden, clinician capacity, lack of skilled pediatric endocrinologists, parent understanding and acceptability, and other structural barriers such as insurance coverage. Emerging recommendations from the American Diabetes Association highlight the potential for population-based screening, but practical strategies for real-world implementation remain underdeveloped. This study is designed to generate practice-informed evidence on how universal T1D islet-autoantibody screening can be feasibly and acceptably integrated into routine pediatric well-child visits. Guided by implementation science and behavioral science principles, the study evaluates an implementation approach that includes education, workflow integration, and facilitation for clinicians and clinic staff. Observational Study Model: This is an observational implementation study. The research team does not assign or deliver any clinical interventions. T1D screening orders and blood draws occur as part of routine care at clinician discretion, and the study observes EHR outcomes and collects surveys/interviews. The research team will deliver a package of implementation supports to all participating clinics. These supports will not be randomly assigned. Study Objectives: 1. Assess feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of integrating population-based islet-autoantibody screening for T1D into pediatric primary care. Implementation effectiveness will also be examined by tracking how often clinicians order screening (penetration) and how often families complete screening (reach). 2. Understand perspectives of multiple constituent groups, including parents, clinicians, clinic administrators, payers, and leaders from relevant national organizations, regarding barriers and facilitators to implementing population-based T1D screening as part of standard pediatric preventive care. Findings from this study will inform future scale-up efforts and support the development of implementation strategies for integrating early T1D detection across U.S. pediatric care settings.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
3,500
This is an observational implementation study. The research team does not assign or deliver any clinical interventions. T1D screening orders and blood draws occur as part of routine care at clinician discretion, and the study observes EHR outcomes and collects surveys/interviews. Participating clinics receive implementation supports (education, facilitation, workflow integration, and consultation) to enable routine screening adoption. These are clinic wide quality improvement activities and are not research 'interventions' assigned to participants, and clinical decisions remain at clinician discretion.
Acceptability (Parent Perspective)
Parent perspectives will be assessed quantitatively through post-visit surveys by answering Likert-scale questions on the perceived acceptability of: (1) discussing T1D screening with a member of the care team during well-child visit and (2) having the child undergo a blood draw for T1D screening.
Time frame: Throughout study period (up to 18 months)
Acceptability (Clinician Perspective)
Clinician perspectives will be assessed quantitatively through phone interviews by answering Likert-scale questions on the perceived acceptability of offering population-based T1D screening at recommended ages during routine well-child visits.
Time frame: Throughout study period (up to 18 months)
Feasibility (Clinician Perspective)
Clinician perspectives will be assessed quantitatively through phone interviews by answering Likert-scale questions on: (1) the perceived feasibility of offering population-based T1D screening during well-child visits within the current workflow and (2) the perceived manageability of the logistics required to implement T1D screening in the practice.
Time frame: Throughout study period (up to 18 months)
Appropriateness (Parent Perspective)
Parent perspectives will be assessed quantitatively through post-visit surveys by answering Likert-scale questions on the perceived relevance of T1D screening for the child.
Time frame: Throughout study period (up to 18 months)
Appropriateness (Clinician Perspective)
Clinician perspectives will be assessed quantitatively through phone interviews by answering Likert-scale questions on the perceived relevance of T1D screening for the patient population.
Time frame: Throughout study period (up to 18 months)
Reach of T1D Screening
Reach will be calculated using both electronic health record (EHR) visit data and parent-reported data. Per EHR data, reach will be calculated as the number of children who completed the islet-autoantibody screening, divided by the number of eligible children during the study period. A secondary, less conservative calculation will use the number of completed screens divided by those for whom screening was ordered. EHR data is seen as the "ground truth" and parent-reported data will be used to supplement this information. Per parent-reported data, reach will be calculated as the number of parents who answered "yes" to the survey question asking if their child has completed the screening after their recent visit, divided by the total number of completed parent surveys.
Time frame: 15-month implementation window
Penetration of T1D Screening
Penetration will be calculated using both EHR visit data and parent-reported data. Per EHR data, penetration will be calculated as the number of children for whom clinicians ordered islet-autoantibody screening, divided by the number of eligible children during the study period. EHR data is seen as the "ground truth" and parent-reported data will be used to supplement this information. Per parent-reported data, penetration will be calculated as the number of parents who answered "yes" to the survey question asking if a member of the care team has ordered islet-autoantibody screening for their child during their recent visit, divided by the total number of completed parent surveys.
Time frame: 15-month implementation window
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.