FASCIA ILIACA BLOCK VERSUS INTRAVENOUS NALBUPHINE AS ANALGESIC METHOD BEFORE POSITIONING FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR HIP FRACTURES

Phase 4Active Not RecruitingNCT07613801

Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College30 enrolled

Overview

Investigators will compare FASCIA ILIACA BLOCK VERSUS INTRAVENOUS NALBUPHINE AS ANALGESIC METHOD BEFORE POSITIONING FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR HIP FRACTURES

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Hip Fracture Surgeries

Interventions

BupivacainDRUG

We will compare fascia ILIACA block with nalbuphine

NalbuphineDRUG

We will compare this with fascia ilaca block

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 30 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Age above 30 years Exclusion Criteria: * Age before 30

Locations (1)

Liaquat National Hospital

Karachi, Pakistan

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain score(VAS score) after 15 minutes of either intervention before spinal anesthesia

Time frame: 15 minutes

Quality of positioning for spinal anesthesia after 15 minutes of either intervention

Scale of 0-3 for hip flexion while sitting after either intervention 0=not satisfactory (poor hip flexion) 1. satisfactory (slight hip flexion) 2. good (adequate hip flexion) 3. optimal (excellent hip flexion)

Time frame: 15 minutes

Secondary Outcomes

Assessment of heart rate

Measured in beat per minute

Time frame: 15 minutes

Assessment of blood pressure

Measured in mmHg

Time frame: 15 minutes

Comfort of patient

Objective observational pain indicators reflecting the patient's acceptance and and tolerance of positioning. 0=calm 1. facial grimacing 2. moaning 3. screaming 4. unable to proceed due to agitation or restlessness

Time frame: 15 minutes

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.