Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease in which long-term treatment success depends greatly on patients' adherence to oral hygiene practices and periodontal therapy. Psychological factors such as oral hygiene-related self-efficacy and illness perception may influence patients' motivation and ability to maintain effective plaque control and attend follow-up visits. However, limited evidence exists regarding the impact of behavioural interventions on adherence and clinical outcomes in periodontal therapy. This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effect of an behavioural intervention on treatment adherence and clinical periodontal outcomes in patients with Stage I-III periodontitis having low oral hygiene-related self-efficacy. A total of 78 participants will be randomized into test and control groups. Both groups will receive Step 1 and 2 periodontal therapy, including professional mechanical plaque removal and risk factor control. The test group will additionally receive a self-efficacy-based behavioural intervention while the control group will receive conventional oral hygiene instructions. Clinical periodontal parameters including Turesky modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TQHI), Full Mouth Bleeding Score (FMBS), probing pocket depth (PPD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) will be assessed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months. Oral hygiene self-efficacy and illness perception will also be evaluated using validated questionnaires. The primary outcomes will be treatment adherence and treatment response at 6 months. The study aims to determine whether a self-efficacy-based behavioural approach can improve adherence and enhance periodontal treatment outcomes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
78
Behavioural intervention based on Bandura's self-efficacy theory aimed at improving oral hygiene adherence and periodontal treatment outcomes through patient motivation and reinforcement strategies.
Routine oral hygiene education and instructions provided during non-surgical periodontal therapy.
Postgraduate institute of dental sciences
Rohtak, Haryana, India
TREATMENT ADHERENCE SCORE
Treatment adherence- defined on the basis of reduction in plaque score and dental visits attended
Time frame: 6 months
PLAQUE INDEX
Turesky modification of Quigley-Hein Index (TQHI) Will be used to assess plaque score. Score range is 0 to 5. Lesser Score means better outcome and higher score means worst outcome
Time frame: 6 months
Full mouth bleeding score (FMBS)
FMBS is expressed as a percentage of bleeding sites: FMBS (%) = (Bleeding sites/Total sites)\*100 0% → No bleeding (excellent gingival health) 100% → Bleeding at all sites (severe inflammation)
Time frame: 6 months
PERCENTAGE RESIDUAL POCKETS
Treatment response- defined as the percentage sites with residual probing depth less than or equal to 4 mm without bleeding on probing at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Pocket Probing Depth
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical Attachment level
Time frame: 6 months
Changes in oral hygiene related self efficacy score
Score ranges from 19 to 76.lesser score means low self efficacy and higher score means high self efficacy related to oral hygiene.
Time frame: 6 months
Changes in brief Illness perception questionnaire score
Score ranges 0 to 80. Higher scores generally indicate a more threatening or negative perception of illness.
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.