RIDECLAS is an observational, prospective, non-interventional consensus study using a modified Delphi methodology. The study aims to obtain expert consensus on the classification and final formulation of recommendations for the RICA Pathway, an enhanced recovery pathway for adult surgery. Participants will be healthcare professionals with experience in enhanced recovery, perioperative medicine, surgery, anesthesiology, nursing, rehabilitation, or related disciplines. Experts will complete sequential online questionnaires. Individual responses will remain confidential, and aggregated anonymized feedback will be provided between Delphi rounds. The study does not involve patients, clinical interventions, biological samples, drugs, or medical devices.
This study will use a modified Delphi process conducted remotely through electronic questionnaires. A coordinating committee will prepare an initial list of recommendations based on the previous RICA Pathway document and updated evidence. Expert panelists will rate each recommendation using a 1-to-9 Likert scale and may provide free-text comments. Two Delphi rounds are planned, with a third round if needed for items without sufficient consensus or for reformulated statements. Between rounds, participants will receive aggregated and anonymized feedback, including measures of agreement, median scores, dispersion, and a summary of comments. Consensus for acceptance is predefined as at least 75% of ratings in the 7-9 range and no more than 15% in the 1-3 range. Consensus for rejection is predefined as at least 75% of ratings in the 1-3 range and no more than 15% in the 7-9 range. Items not meeting consensus criteria may be reassessed in subsequent rounds. The analysis will be descriptive and will include response rates, attrition between rounds, item-level agreement, median scores, interquartile ranges, and qualitative thematic review of comments.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
384
Sequential online questionnaires used to rate and classify proposed RICA Pathway recommendations. This is not a clinical intervention and does not involve patient care, drugs, devices, or invasive procedures.
Department of Surgery
Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
Expert consensus on RICA Pathway recommendations
Consensus will be assessed for each recommendation using predefined Delphi criteria. Acceptance consensus will be defined as at least 75% of ratings in the 7-9 range and no more than 15% in the 1-3 range. Rejection consensus will be defined as at least 75% of ratings in the 1-3 range and no more than 15% in the 7-9 range.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 7 months
Degree of agreement for each recommendation
Distribution of ratings, median score, interquartile range, and percentage of ratings in predefined agreement/disagreement ranges.
Time frame: After each Delphi round, up to 7 months.
Stability of ratings between Delphi rounds
Descriptive assessment of changes in item-level ratings and consensus status between rounds.
Time frame: Between round 1 and round 2, and round 3 if performed, up to 7 months.
Response rate and attrition between rounds
Number and percentage of invited experts who complete each round, and percentage lost between rounds.
Time frame: After each Delphi round, up to 7 months.
Qualitative analysis of expert comments
Thematic review of free-text comments to support item reformulation and interpretation of items without consensus.
Time frame: After each Delphi round, up to 7 months.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.