This prospective, response-adapted phase II study evaluates the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant culmerciclib in combination with aromatase inhibitors in patients with highly proliferative ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. All patients initially receive induction treatment with culmerciclib plus endocrine therapy, followed by on-treatment assessment of biological and clinical response. Patients demonstrating an adequate response continue the same regimen, whereas those with a suboptimal response are transitioned to alternative treatment strategies prior to surgery. This adaptive approach aims to optimize treatment selection, improve therapeutic efficacy, and avoid unnecessary exposure to ineffective therapy.
This is a prospective, response-adapted, phase II study designed to evaluate an individualized neoadjuvant treatment strategy based on culmerciclib in combination with aromatase inhibitors in patients with highly proliferative ER-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer. The study incorporates an adaptive treatment algorithm guided by on-treatment assessment of tumor response, with the aim of optimizing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing unnecessary treatment exposure. All eligible patients initially receive neoadjuvant treatment with culmerciclib plus endocrine therapy according to the study protocol. Following completion of a predefined initial treatment phase, tumor response is assessed using biological and clinical evaluation methods. Patients who achieve an adequate response continue the same neoadjuvant regimen to complete the planned course of therapy. In contrast, patients demonstrating a suboptimal response are transitioned to alternative treatment strategies prior to surgery. Subsequent treatment selection and management are conducted according to protocol-defined principles and investigator assessment. This response-adapted strategy is intended to address the clinical heterogeneity of endocrine sensitivity in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. By tailoring treatment intensity according to early response, the study seeks to maximize therapeutic benefit in responsive patients while facilitating timely treatment modification for those less likely to benefit from the initial regimen. Primary and secondary objectives include evaluation of clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of the response-adapted neoadjuvant strategy, and the feasibility of treatment modification based on early response assessment. Exploratory analyses will investigate potential biomarkers associated with treatment response and resistance, with the goal of informing future individualized treatment approaches.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
45
CDK2/4/6 inhibitor
Letrozole or anastrozole
2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
RECRUITINGComplete cell cycle arrest (CCCA)
Ki67≤2.7%
Time frame: 4 weeks
the proportion of patients with Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) class 0-1
Time frame: 24 weeks
Total Pathological Complete Response (tpCR) Rate
Time frame: 24 weeks
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: 24 weeks
Event-Free Survival (EFS)
EFS is defined as the time from randomization to any of the following events: precludes surgery, local or distant recurrence, second primary malignancy, or death due to any cause.
Time frame: Approximately five years
Adverse Event (AE)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a medicinal product, temporally associated with study intervention, without presumption of causality.
Time frame: Approximately three years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.