Glioblastoma (GBM) remains aggressive despite standard therapy (surgery (CRET) + RT/CT). Over 40% of patients develop recurrence between surgery and pre-RT MRI, with median overall survival (OS) of 13.3m and 24.4m for patients with and without recurrence in pre-RT MRI, respectively. Reoperation is avoided as it delays adjuvant therapy. LITT offers a minimally invasive alternative that may: * Treat recurrence without delaying RT/CT * Potentially sensitize tumors to subsequent therapy This study tests if LITT can be practically integrated within the critical 1-week window between pre-RT MRI and radiotherapy initiation, maintaining the adjuvant schedule.
Background: GBM is frequent and still has a poor prognosis. Standard therapy consists of complete resection of enhancing tumor (CRET) followed by RT and CT. At the institution, patients planned for RT undergo a pre-radiotherapy planning MRI. As recently published, \>40% of patients exhibit contrast-enhancing tumor recurrence in the short interval between early postoperative MRI and pre-RT MRI, despite CRET in the initial surgery. This ultra-early recurrence is strongly associated with shorter OS: in the cohort, median overall survival (OS) was 13.3m and 24.4m for patients with and without recurrence in pre-RT MRI, respectively. Hence, pre-radiation GBM recurrence is a frequent event with detrimental consequences for patients. Reoperation in this setting is rarely performed as it delays adjuvant treatment, which worsen prognosis further. LITT is an established, minimally invasive treatment form for brain lesions such as glioblastoma recurrences and metastases. LITT may offer a solution to this dilemma as its minimal invasiveness enables to ablate the recurrent tumor without delaying treatment. As an additional benefit, LITT may work as a potent sensitizer to subsequent RT and CT. A key challenge in the implementation of LITT in this setting is the tight scheduling window (maximum 1 week) between pre-radiotherapy planning MRI and start of radiotherapy. In order not to delay adjuvant treatment, LITT should optimally be performed within this time window. To be feasible, both planning and execution of LITT, including coordination of intraoperative MRI and engineering support, must occur within this short timeframe. This feasibility study aims to prospectively investigate whether LITT can be integrated into the existing care pathway without postponing of adjuvant treatment. This may lay the groundwork for future clinical trials. Objective: The aim is to test feasibility of integrating scheduling, planning and execution of LITT into the standard treatment course of patients with CRET-resected glioblastoma scheduled to receive concomitant radio-chemotherapy. The primary objective of this feasibility study is to evaluate the feasibility of performing LITT for ultra-early recurrence following GBM resection without delaying adjuvant radio-chemotherapy. Secondary objectives are collected to estimate the effect size of pre-RT LITT on median overall survival compared to patients with ultra-early recurrence who do not receive LITT, and to historic controls; the purpose of these endpoints is to guide power calculations of a subsequent phase II trial. Methods: This is a prospective, single-arm, monocentric feasibility study conducted at the University Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern. The study is exploratory in nature and aims to generate foundational data for a larger, multi-centric phase II trial. At the University Hospital of Bern, all patients are presented to the tumor board after surgery for brain tumors. All patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma and without residual contrast enhancement (CRET) meeting the inclusion criteria for study participation will be asked for consent and, where applicable, included in the trial. All patients showing ultra-early recurrence on planning MRI and meeting the inclusion criteria for LITT will be considered to undergo LITT before the beginning of radiotherapy. Patients without recurrence ("no recurrence" group) and patients with recurrence who do not undergo LITT ("recurrence/no LITT" group) will serve as internal control groups.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
12
Patients undergoing MR-guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) between pre-RT MRI and RT.
Dep. of Neurosurgery, Bern University Hospital
Bern, Switzerland
RECRUITINGRate of patients who successfully complete the planned treatment
Proportion of CRET patients who successfully complete the planned treatment protocol without protocol violation, until the end of radiation therapy. A protocol violation is defined as any of the following: a delay of more than 7 days in the scheduled pre-RT MRI, LITT procedure, or RT initiation, or an interruption of RT due to a LITT-related event. The study teams aims to describe logistical and organizational difficulties (coordination of intraoperative MRI-availability, engineering support).
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of radiotherapy, an average of 8 weeks
Complications of LITT
Any deviation from the normal postoperative course, including any new appearance of blood during LITT MRI, any seeding along the trajectory of the probe, any pathological wound condition such as dehiscence or infection
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of radiotherapy, an average of 8 weeks
Delay of Radiotherapy
Measurement of the time-lag between planning MRI and beginning of radiation, and comparsion to pre-planned radiation start
Time frame: assessed the day of radiation start, ranging from 3 to 6 weeks after GBM resection
Use of steroids
Use of steroids: Binary (yes/no) and, if applicable, dose and duration
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of radiotherapy, an average of 8 weeks
Evolution of radiation necrosis
Any increase of the size of the contrast enhancing lesion
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of radiotherapy, an average of 8 weeks
Evolution of target lesion
Any increase of the size of the contrast enhancing lesion
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of radiotherapy, an average of 8 weeks
Evolution of pseudoprogression
Any increase of the size of the contrast enhancing lesion
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of radiotherapy, an average of 8 weeks
Time to local recurrence
Time from detection of relapse to detection of local glioblastoma recurrence (lesion within/at the borders of the surgical cavity or associated FLAIR/T2 hyperintensity)
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of radiotherapy, an average of 8 weeks
Time to distant recurrence
Time from detection of relapse to detection of distant glioblastoma recurrence (outside the borders of the surgical cavity or associated FLAIR/T2 hyperintensity)
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of radiotherapy, an average of 8 weeks
Median overall survival
Median overall survival measured from first surgery to death
Time frame: from enrollment to date of death, assessed up to the end of the study period (end of ratiotherapy for the last included patient)
Site of recurrence
Spatial position of the recurrence (local adjacent, distant)
Time frame: assessed the day of radiation start, ranging from 3 to 6 weeks after GBM resection
Recruitment rate
Proportion of CRET patients who agree to participate
Time frame: at study completion (date of end of radiotherapy for the last included patient, approximately 2 years after enrollment of the first participant
Progression rate
Proportion of recruited patients who present with progression on pre-RT MRI
Time frame: pre RT-MRI
Inclusion rate
Rate of recruited patients who agree to receiving LITT
Time frame: pre RT-MRI
Treatment rate
Rate of recruited patients who receive LITT
Time frame: at study completion (date of end of radiotherapy for the last included patient, approximately 2 years after enrollment of the first participant
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.