Air vs. Liquid: A Study on Cystoscopy Performance and Visibility Enhancement in Macrohematuria Cases

Overview

Macroscopic haematuria is a common urological emergency. Diagnostic cystoscopy is the gold standard for identifying the bleeding source; however, blood and clots within the bladder significantly impair endoscopic visibility when saline is used as the distension medium. Air-based cystoscopy, a technique first described in the 19th century, exploits the immiscibility of gas and blood to maintain clear visualisation even during active bleeding. Despite its theoretical advantages, no randomised clinical data exist to support its use. AIROSCOPY is a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-centre superiority study comparing air-based versus saline-based flexible cystoscopy in patients with macroscopic haematuria (Grade III-V). Patients are randomised 1:1. Only the index cystoscopy (first randomised modality) contributes to all study endpoints. A second cystoscopy with the alternative modality is performed solely for patient safety to ensure no diagnostic disadvantage from study participation. This second examination is not analysed. The primary endpoint is identification of the bleeding source during the index cystoscopy (binary: yes/no). Secondary endpoints include time to source identification, total procedure duration, urologist-rated visibility (Likert scale), and patient comfort (Likert scale).

Background: Continuous bladder irrigation (CBI) is the current standard management for haematuria, but can delay diagnostic cystoscopy. Gas-based cystoscopy may allow earlier and clearer visualisation of the bladder mucosa. Design: Prospective, randomised (1:1), controlled, parallel-group, open-label, single-centre superiority trial. Randomisation is stratified by haematuria grade and history of transurethral resection (TUR-B/P), using REDCap. Intervention: Index cystoscopy with either air (up to 240 ml by syringe) or saline (up to 240 ml by syringe), according to randomisation. A second cystoscopy with the alternative medium follows immediately, exclusively to ensure no diagnostic disadvantage for the patient (results not analysed). Sample size: N=40 (20 per arm), based on detection rates of 86% (air) vs. 38% (saline), two-sided α=0.05, 80% power, with 20% attrition allowance. Statistics: Chi-square test (Fisher's exact test) for the primary endpoint; risk ratio and risk difference with 95% CI reported.