atients with combat-related amputations frequently develop chronic neuroma pain that interferes with rehabilitation, prosthesis use, mobility, sleep, and quality of life. Cryoablation is a minimally invasive treatment that produces controlled nerve injury using extreme cold. Although the freezing effect is localized around the cryoprobe, axonal interruption followed by distal Wallerian degeneration may extend functional denervation distal to the ablation site. This study aims to compare two ultrasound-guided cryoablation strategies for chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation: cryoablation performed directly near the neuroma and cryoablation performed proximal to the neuroma along the affected nerve. The study will evaluate whether proximal nerve cryoablation produces greater or longer-lasting analgesic effects compared with perineuroma cryoablation.
Chronic neuroma pain is a common and disabling complication following combat-related limb trauma and amputation. Persistent neuroma pain may contribute to residual limb pain, phantom limb pain, impaired prosthesis tolerance, reduced mobility, sleep disturbance, and decreased quality of life. Current treatment strategies frequently provide incomplete or temporary analgesia. Cryoablation is an ultrasound-guided minimally invasive technique that induces controlled axonal injury using extreme cold temperatures. Although the direct freezing zone extends only a few millimeters around the cryoprobe, cryo-induced axonotmesis may trigger distal Wallerian degeneration along the affected nerve pathway while preserving connective tissue structures that support potential nerve regeneration. The optimal anatomical target for cryoablation in painful neuromas remains unclear. Cryoablation performed directly adjacent to the neuroma may interrupt local nociceptive signaling, whereas proximal nerve cryoablation may produce broader distal analgesic effects by interrupting axonal conduction proximal to the neuroma-bearing segment. The AXON-FREEZE Trial is a prospective multicenter controlled study designed to compare proximal nerve cryoablation versus perineuroma cryoablation for chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation. Participants with ultrasound-confirmed painful neuromas will undergo ultrasound-guided cryoablation using one of the two treatment strategies according to study allocation and local clinical practice. Clinical follow-up will include assessment of neuroma pain intensity, neuropathic pain characteristics, phantom limb pain, residual limb pain, prosthesis tolerance, analgesic consumption, patient-reported improvement, and adverse events. The study aims to improve understanding of cryoablation targeting strategies and evaluate whether proximal nerve cryoablation may provide stronger or longer-lasting pain relief compared with cryoablation performed adjacent to the neuroma.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
50
Ultrasound-guided cryoablation performed adjacent to the painful neuroma.
Ultrasound-guided cryoablation performed proximal to the neuroma along the affected nerve.
Vinnitsya university hospital
Vinnytsia, Вінницька, Ukraine
Change in Chronic Neuroma Pain Intensity
Change in average neuroma pain intensity measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).
Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
DN4 neuropathic pain score
Assessment of neuropathic pain characteristics using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire. Higher scores indicate greater neuropathic pain involvement associated with chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation.
Time frame: : Baseline to 24 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.