This manuscript presents a 24-month randomised clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of bioactive restorative materials in preventing secondary caries compared with conventional composite restorations. Four restorative materials were tested in 120 class I and II cavities among high-caries-risk adults: conventional composite (Filtek Z350 XT), glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX GP), giomer (Beautifil II), and Cention N.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
120
College of Dentistry, Jouf University
Sakakah, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia
Primary outcome measure
Number of Restorations Developing Secondary Caries. Secondary caries will be assessed using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-II), with any score ≥3 at the cavosurface margin considered indicative of secondary caries. Evaluations will be performed at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months.
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Filtek Z350 XT Composite Resin