This study aims to evaluate whether a structured biological optimization program can improve reflux symptoms and overall recovery in patients with achalasia cardia who previously underwent Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM). Although POEM is highly effective for relieving swallowing difficulty, many patients develop gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after the procedure and remain dependent on long-term acid suppressive medications such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The BIO-POEM study will compare structured biological optimization with standard post-POEM care in patients with objectively confirmed pathological reflux after POEM. The intervention includes reflux-oriented dietary counseling, micronutrient assessment and correction, Helicobacter pylori testing and eradication when indicated, lifestyle optimization, and structured review and tapering of PPI/PCAB therapy. The study includes two components: A randomized controlled trial enrolling post-POEM patients with objectively confirmed reflux. A parallel prospective observational registry enrolling symptomatic post-POEM patients who are unable to undergo reflux testing or who remain symptomatic despite low acid exposure. The primary objective is to determine whether structured biological optimization reduces GERD symptom burden at 12 months compared with standard care. Secondary objectives include evaluation of dyspepsia symptoms, nutritional recovery, quality of life, reduction in PPI dependence, and exploratory assessment of gut microbiome changes.
This study aims to evaluate whether a structured biological optimization program can improve reflux symptoms and overall recovery in patients with achalasia cardia who previously underwent Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM). Although POEM is highly effective for relieving swallowing difficulty, many patients develop gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after the procedure and remain dependent on long-term acid suppressive medications such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The BIO-POEM study will compare structured biological optimization with standard post-POEM care in patients with objectively confirmed pathological reflux after POEM. The intervention includes reflux-oriented dietary counseling, micronutrient assessment and correction, Helicobacter pylori testing and eradication when indicated, lifestyle optimization, and structured review and tapering of PPI/PCAB therapy. The study includes two components: A randomized controlled trial enrolling post-POEM patients with objectively confirmed reflux. A parallel prospective observational registry enrolling symptomatic post-POEM patients who are unable to undergo reflux testing or who remain symptomatic despite low acid exposure. The primary objective is to determine whether structured biological optimization reduces GERD symptom burden at 12 months compared with standard care. Secondary objectives include evaluation of dyspepsia symptoms, nutritional recovery, quality of life, reduction in PPI dependence, and exploratory assessment of gut microbiome changes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
166
A structured, protocol-driven multimodal intervention designed to optimize post-POEM recovery in patients with achalasia cardia. The intervention includes individualized reflux-oriented dietary counseling (meal timing, portion control, and trigger food modification), lifestyle optimization (sleep hygiene, weight management, and physical activity guidance), systematic evaluation and correction of micronutrient deficiencies (including vitamin D, vitamin B12, iron, calcium, magnesium, and pre-albumin where indicated), Helicobacter pylori testing with eradication therapy when positive, and a structured, stepwise protocol for proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB) de-escalation guided by symptoms and clinical assessment. The intervention is delivered as a standardized care pathway integrated into routine post-POEM follow-up.
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology
Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Change in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Score From Baseline to 12 Months
The primary outcome is the change in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) score from baseline to 12 months after randomization in post-POEM patients with objectively confirmed pathological reflux. The GERD-HRQL questionnaire is a validated reflux-specific symptom assessment scale with total scores ranging from 0 to 50, where higher scores indicate worse reflux symptoms and poorer reflux-related quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Proportion of Participants Successfully Discontinuing Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) or Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker (PCAB) Therapy by 12 Months
Proportion of participants successfully discontinuing proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB) therapy by 12 months after initiation of study intervention.
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Change in Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire Score From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months
Change in dyspepsia symptom severity assessed using the Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire. Higher scores indicate worse dyspepsia symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Change in Serum Vitamin D Levels From Baseline to 6 Months
Change in serum vitamin D levels measured in ng/mL.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in Serum Calcium Levels
Change in serum calcium levels measured in mg/dL.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in Serum Iron Levels
Change in serum iron levels measured in µg/dL.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in Serum Vitamin B12 Levels
Change in serum vitamin B12 levels measured in pg/mL.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in Serum Pre-albumin Levels
Change in serum pre-albumin levels measured in mg/dL.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in SF-36 Quality of Life Scores From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months
Change in health-related quality of life assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). SF-36 scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.