AIM-MET is a randomized clinical study testing whether a fixed microbiome-targeted nutritional product can improve blood sugar control in adults with type 2 diabetes when used in addition to usual stable diabetes treatment. The study will compare the active nutritional product with a matching placebo over 24 weeks. The product was designed using artificial intelligence before the study began, but the same fixed formulation will be used for all participants assigned to the active group. Artificial intelligence will not be used during the study to make individual treatment decisions, adjust dosing, or personalize the product. The main question is whether participants receiving the active product have a greater reduction in HbA1c, a standard marker of average blood sugar levels, from the start of the study to Week 24 compared with participants receiving placebo. The study will also evaluate early blood sugar changes, fasting glucose, body weight and waist measurements in participants with baseline BMI of at least 25.0 kg/m2, safety, hypoglycaemia events, patient-reported outcomes, and gut microbiome features. This is a 100-participant proof-of-concept study intended to estimate the size of the treatment signal, safety, feasibility, and parameters needed for a future larger confirmatory trial.
Type 2 diabetes is commonly managed with lifestyle measures and glucose-lowering medications, but many individuals continue to have residual hyperglycaemia despite stable treatment. Nutritional interventions that target the gut microbiome may provide a safe adjunctive approach if they can improve glycaemic control without replacing standard diabetes care. The gut microbiome may influence glucose regulation through several biological pathways, including short-chain fatty acid production, bile acid metabolism, intestinal barrier function, low-grade inflammation, incretin signalling, and other host-microbe interactions. These mechanisms provide the rationale for evaluating a microbiome-targeted nutritional intervention in adults with type 2 diabetes. The investigational product is a fixed AI-guided microbiome-targeted nutritional formulation. The artificial intelligence methodology was used before the clinical trial to support formulation design, including ingredient and dose selection from candidate microbiome-active compounds. The output of this process is one fixed formulation that is locked before participant enrolment and is identical for all participants assigned to the active intervention arm. The artificial intelligence system is not used during the trial for participant-level prediction, diagnosis, clinical decision-making, dosing, personalization, or formulation adjustment. Therefore, the clinical study evaluates the fixed nutritional product, not the independent clinical performance of an artificial intelligence system. Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the active nutritional intervention or a matching placebo for 24 weeks. Both groups receive identical structured lifestyle counselling and continue stable background glucose-lowering therapy as clinically appropriate. The placebo is matched to the active product in appearance, taste, smell, packaging, administration schedule, and storage conditions, and is intended to be microbiome- and glycaemia-neutral. The primary clinical assessment is the change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 24. Week 24 was selected because HbA1c reflects average glycaemia over the preceding 2 to 3 months and is therefore appropriate for evaluating a gradually acting nutritional and microbiome-targeted intervention. The study also evaluates supportive glycaemic, anthropometric, safety, patient-reported, and microbiome-related measures. This 100-participant proof-of-concept trial is designed to detect a clinically meaningful HbA1c signal and to estimate safety, feasibility, variability, and effect-size parameters for a future larger confirmatory trial. The study is not intended to replace standard diabetes care or to assess the investigational product as a substitute for clinically indicated glucose-lowering medication.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
100
Fixed AI-guided microbiome-targeted oral food supplement administered for 24 weeks. The formulation is fixed and identical for all participants randomized to the active intervention arm. The artificial intelligence methodology was used before the trial for formulation design only and is not used during the trial for participant-level prediction, dosing, clinical decision-making, or formulation adjustment. Participants also receive identical structured lifestyle counselling and continue stable permitted background glucose-lowering therapy as clinically appropriate.
Matching placebo oral supplement administered for 24 weeks. The placebo is matched to the active product in appearance, taste, smell, packaging, administration schedule, and storage conditions. The placebo is intended to be microbiome- and glycaemia-neutral and free of active prebiotic, probiotic, synbiotic, postbiotic, glycaemically active, or other bioactive components reasonably expected to affect HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, body weight, microbiome composition, or inflammatory markers. Participants also receive identical structured lifestyle counselling and continue stable permitted background glucose-lowering therapy as clinically appropriate.
Bakırçay University Faculty of Medicine Endocrinology Department
Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
RECRUITINGChange in HbA1c from baseline to Week 24
HbA1c is a blood test that reflects average blood glucose levels over approximately the previous 2 to 3 months. HbA1c is measured using an NGSP-certified central laboratory assay and reported as a percentage. The outcome is the absolute change in HbA1c, in percentage points, from baseline to Week 24. A greater reduction indicates improved glycaemic control.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Proportion of participants achieving HbA1c reduction of at least 0.5 percentage points at Week 24
This outcome measures the proportion of participants whose HbA1c decreases by at least 0.5 percentage points from baseline to Week 24. HbA1c is a blood test reflecting average glucose levels over approximately 2 to 3 months and is measured using an NGSP-certified central laboratory assay. Participants who meet or exceed this reduction threshold are counted as responders.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Proportion of participants achieving HbA1c reduction of at least 0.3 percentage points at Week 24
This outcome measures the proportion of participants whose HbA1c decreases by at least 0.3 percentage points from baseline to Week 24. HbA1c is measured using an NGSP-certified central laboratory assay and reported as a percentage. Participants who meet or exceed this reduction threshold are counted as responders.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 12
HbA1c is a blood test that reflects average blood glucose levels over approximately the previous 2 to 3 months. This outcome measures the absolute change in HbA1c, in percentage points, from baseline to Week 12. This earlier time point is used to describe the early trajectory of glycaemic response.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to Week 24
Fasting plasma glucose is a blood measure of glucose concentration after an overnight fast of at least 8 hours. Baseline and Week 24 values are each defined as the mean of two fasting plasma glucose samples drawn within a 7-day window. The outcome is the absolute change from baseline to Week 24. A greater reduction indicates improved fasting glycaemia.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Achievement of HbA1c less than 7.0% at Week 24 among participants with baseline HbA1c at least 7.0%
This outcome measures the proportion of participants with baseline HbA1c of at least 7.0% who achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% at Week 24. HbA1c is measured using an NGSP-certified central laboratory assay and reported as a percentage. Participants below the 7.0% threshold at Week 24 are counted as achieving this outcome.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Percent change in body weight at Week 24 in participants with baseline BMI at least 25.0 kg/m2
This outcome is assessed only in participants with baseline body mass index, or BMI, of at least 25.0 kg/m2. Body weight is measured using a standardized calibrated scale procedure. Percent change is calculated as 100 x (Week 24 body weight - baseline body weight) / baseline body weight. A negative value indicates weight reduction.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change in waist circumference at Week 24 in participants with baseline BMI at least 25.0 kg/m2
This outcome is assessed only in participants with baseline BMI of at least 25.0 kg/m2. Waist circumference is measured using a standardized non-stretch tape procedure. The outcome is the absolute change in waist circumference from baseline to Week 24, reported in centimeters. A negative value indicates a reduction in waist circumference.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.