The main aim of this study is to find out how well elritercept works to improve anemia in participants with myelofibrosis (MF) who are taking ruxolitinib when compared to placebo. Other aims are to learn how elritercept improves anemia compared to placebo; to learn if elritercept reduces tiredness, improves symptoms related to MF, and helps participants do physical activities more easily. The study also aims to find out how elritercept affects the bone marrow, the spleen, and whether participants develop antibodies to the study drug. The study will also check how safe elritercept is compared to placebo, and if elritercept stays safe over a long period of time. Participants will receive study treatment for at least 9 months (36 weeks). After this period, participants who received placebo will have the option to switch to elritercept.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
324
Elritercept-matching placebo
Elritercept, SC, injection
Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGLos Angeles Cancer Network
Glendale, California, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGCancer and Blood Specialty Clinic
Whittier, California, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGMedStar Georgetown University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGProportion of Participants Who Are Red Blood Cell-Transfusion Independent (RBC-TI) for Any Consecutive Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 12-Week Period During the 36-Week Double-Blinded Treatment Period
RBC-TI is defined as no RBC transfusions administered for the specified time period during study treatment.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of Participants Who Achieve ≥50 Percent (%) Reduction in RBC Transfusion Burden From Baseline Over Any Consecutive 12-Week Period
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of Participants Who Are RBC-TI for Any Consecutive ≥16-Week Period
RBC-TI is defined as no RBC transfusions administered for the specified time period during study treatment.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of Participants Who Are RBC-TI for Any Consecutive ≥12-Week Period With Concurrent Mean Hemoglobin (Hgb) Increase ≥1.5 Grams per Deciliter (g/dL) From Baseline
RBC-TI is defined as no RBC transfusions administered for the specified time period during study treatment.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of Participants Who Are RBC-TI for Any Consecutive ≥24-Week Period
RBC-TI is defined as no RBC transfusions administered for the specified time period during study treatment.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of Participants Who Are RBC-TI for Any Consecutive ≥12-Week Period With Concurrent Mean Hgb Increase of ≥1.0 g/dL and ≥2.0 g/dL From Baseline
RBC-TI is defined as no RBC transfusions administered for the specified time period during study treatment.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of Participants Who Are RBC-TI for Any Consecutive 16- or 24-Week Period With a Concurrent Mean Hgb Increase of ≥1.0 g/dL, ≥1.5 g/dL, and ≥2.0 g/dL From Baseline
RBC-TI is defined as no RBC transfusions administered for the specified time period during study treatment.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Maximum Duration of RBC-TI for Participants Who Achieved RBC-TI for a Consecutive ≥12 Weeks
RBC-TI is defined as no RBC transfusions administered for the specified time period during study treatment.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Maximum Duration of RBC-TI With Concurrent Mean Hgb Increase of ≥1.5 g/dL for Participants Who Achieved Consecutive ≥12 Weeks RBC-TI With Concurrent Mean Hgb Increase of ≥1.5 g/dL
RBC-TI is defined as no RBC transfusions administered for the specified time period during study treatment.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Time to Onset of Anemia Response
Time to onset of anemia response is defined as the duration between the date of randomization and the date participant first achieved anemia response status. Anemia response is evaluated as: achievement of RBC-TI for any consecutive ≥12-week, ≥16-week, or ≥24-week period or ≥50% reduction in red blood cell transfusion burden from baseline over any consecutive 12 weeks.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 7a T-Score at Week 36
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 7a is a 7-item, patient-reported measure designed to assess fatigue symptoms and impact over the past 7 days. Response options are on a 5-point scale from never (1) to always (5). Raw scores are computed by summing responses to all 7 items and then converted to a standardized T-score on a scale from 0 to 100 with a mean of 50 and SD of 10 with higher scores representing worse fatigue. T-scores can be produced using a conversion table available from the instrument developer or using response pattern scoring performed by the Health Measures Scoring Service.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Mean Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Scale Score at Week 36
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item, participant-reported multidomain questionnaire designed to assess functioning, wellbeing, and symptom experience of participants with cancer. The questionnaire's items are divided among 5 multi-item scales measuring functioning (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), 3 multi-item scales measuring symptoms (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 items measuring symptoms (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea) as well as financial difficulties, and a 2-item scale measuring global health status (GHS))/quality of life (QoL). Items included in GHS/QoL scale use a 7-point response metric ranging from very poor to excellent, while other items use a 4-point response metric with categories including not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much. Scale scores are transformed to range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better functioning, GHS/QoL, or worse symptomatology.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Proportion of Participants With Meaningful Improvement and Meaningful Deterioration in PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 7a T-score
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 7a is a 7-item, patient-reported measure designed to assess fatigue symptoms and impact over the past 7 days. Response options are on a 5-point scale from never (1) to always (5). Raw scores are computed by summing responses to all 7 items and then converted to a standardized T-score on a scale from 0 to 100 with a mean of 50 and SD of 10 with higher scores representing worse fatigue. T-scores can be produced using a conversion table available from the instrument developer or using response pattern scoring performed by the Health Measures Scoring Service. Score cutoffs to define meaningful improvement and meaningful deterioration will be determined prior to the primary analysis based on analysis of blinded trial data in accordance with a prespecified psychometric analysis plan.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Time to Meaningful Improvement and Meaningful Deterioration in PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 7a T-Score From Baseline
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 7a is a 7-item, patient-reported measure designed to assess fatigue symptoms and impact over the past 7 days. Response options are on a 5-point scale from never (1) to always (5). Raw scores are computed by summing responses to all 7 items and then converted to a standardized T-score on a scale from 0 to 100 with a mean of 50 and SD of 10 with higher scores representing worse fatigue. T-scores can be produced using a conversion table available from the instrument developer or using response pattern scoring performed by the Health Measures Scoring Service. Score cutoffs to define meaningful improvement and meaningful deterioration will be determined prior to the primary analysis based on analysis of blinded trial data in accordance with a prespecified psychometric analysis plan.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of Participants With Meaningful Improvement and Meaningful Deterioration in EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale Score
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item, participant-reported multidomain questionnaire designed to assess functioning, wellbeing, and symptom experience of participant with cancer. The items are divided among 5 multi-item scales measuring functioning (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), 3 multi-item scales measuring symptoms (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain), 6 items measuring symptoms (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea) as well as financial difficulties, and a 2-item scale measuring GHS and QoL. Items included in GHS/QoL scale use a 7-point response metric ranging from very poor to excellent, while other items use a 4-point response metric, categories including not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much. Scale scores are transformed to range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better functioning, better GHS/QoL, or worse symptomatology. Score cutoffs to define meaningful improvement/deterioration to be determined before primary analysis.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Time to Meaningful Improvement and Meaningful Deterioration in EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale Score From Baseline
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item, participant-reported multidomain questionnaire designed to assess functioning, wellbeing, and symptom experience of participant with cancer. The items are divided among 5 multi-item scales measuring functioning (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social), 3 multi-item scales measuring symptoms (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain), 6 items measuring symptoms (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea) as well as financial difficulties, and a 2-item scale measuring GHS and QoL. Items included in GHS/QoL scale use a 7-point response metric ranging from very poor to excellent, while other items use a 4-point response metric, categories including not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much. Scale scores are transformed to range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better functioning, better GHS/QoL, or worse symptomatology. Score cutoffs to define meaningful improvement/deterioration to be determined before primary analysis.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Mean Changes From Baseline in Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v4.0 7-Item Total Symptom Score at Week 36
MFSAF v4.0 is a unidimensional measure assessing 7 core MF symptoms: fatigue, night sweats, itching, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs, early satiety, and bone pain. The questionnaire asks participants to rate each symptom at its worst during the past 7 days on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale ranging from absent (0) to worst imaginable (10). The Total Symptom Score (TSS) is calculated as the average of the 7 individual item responses multiplied by 7, yielding a score range of 0 to 70 with higher scores representing worse symptom severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Proportion of Participants Achieving Confirmed 50% Reduction in MFSAF v4.0 Total Symptom Score (TSS50)
MFSAF v4.0 is a unidimensional measure assessing 7 core MF symptoms: fatigue, night sweats, itching, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs, early satiety, and bone pain. The questionnaire asks participants to rate each symptom at its worst during the past 7 days on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale ranging from absent (0) to worst imaginable (10). The TSS is calculated as the average of the 7 individual item responses multiplied by 7, yielding a score range of 0 to 70 with higher scores representing worse symptom severity.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Time to Symptom Response in MFSAF TSS50 From Baseline
MFSAF v4.0 is a unidimensional measure assessing 7 core MF symptoms: fatigue, night sweats, itching, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs, early satiety, and bone pain. The questionnaire asks participants to rate each symptom at its worst during the past 7 days on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale ranging from absent (0) to worst imaginable (10). The TSS is calculated as the average of the 7 individual item responses multiplied by 7, yielding a score range of 0 to 70 with higher scores representing worse symptom severity.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Mean Change From Baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale Score at Week 36
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item, participant-reported multidomain questionnaire designed to assess functioning, wellbeing, and symptom experience of participant with cancer. The questionnaire's items include 5 multi-item scales measuring functioning (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social). These items use a 4-point response metric with categories including not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much. Scale scores are transformed to range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Proportion of Participants With Meaningful Improvement and Meaningful Deterioration in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale Score
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item, participant-reported multidomain questionnaire designed to assess functioning, wellbeing, and symptom experience of participant with cancer. The questionnaire's items include 5 multi-item scales measuring functioning (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social). These items use a 4-point response metric with categories including not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much. Scale scores are transformed to range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better functioning. Score cutoffs to define meaningful improvement and meaningful deterioration will be determined prior to the primary analysis based on analysis of blinded trial data in accordance with a prespecified psychometric analysis plan.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Time to Meaningful Improvement and Meaningful Deterioration in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale Score From Baseline
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item, participant-reported multidomain questionnaire designed to assess functioning, wellbeing, and symptom experience of participant with cancer. The questionnaire's items include 5 multi-item scales measuring functioning (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social). These items use a 4-point response metric with categories including not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much. Scale scores are transformed to range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better functioning. Score cutoffs to define meaningful improvement and meaningful deterioration will be determined prior to the primary analysis based on analysis of blinded trial data in accordance with a prespecified psychometric analysis plan.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of Participants With Platelet Response During the 36-Week Double-Blinded Treatment Period
Platelet response includes a mean increase of ≥30×10\^9/ liter (L) from baseline, a \>50% increase from baseline with a count ≥50×10\^9/L, and conversion from \<100 to ≥100×10\^9/L, each sustained for ≥12 weeks.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of Participants Achieving Spleen Volume Reduction (SVR) From Baseline as Measured by Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CT/MRI) During the 36-Week Double-Blinded Treatment Period
Proportion of participants achieving SVR of ≥10%, ≥25%, or ≥35% will be presented for this outcome measure.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 through Week 36 (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of Participants Who Develop Accelerated Phase (AP) MF
Time frame: Up to approximately 7 years
Time to Progression in Participants Who Develop AP MF
Time frame: Up to approximately 7 years
Proportion of Participants Who Develop Blast Phase (BP) MF
Time frame: Up to approximately 7 years
Time to Progression in Participants Who Develop BP MF
Time frame: Up to approximately 7 years
Plasma Concentration-Time Data for Participants Treated With Elritercept
Time frame: At multiple time points from Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) up to approximately 7 years
Proportion of Participants Treated With Elritercept who Have Antidrug Antibodies
Time frame: At multiple time points from Cycle 1 Day 1 (each cycle is 28 days) up to approximately 7 years
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause.
Time frame: From randomization to 7 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Advanced Research, LLC
Coral Springs, Florida, United States
RECRUITINGBioresearch Partners
Miami, Florida, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGAdventHealth - Cancer Institute - Orlando
Orlando, Florida, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGFlorida Clinical Trials Group
Tamarac, Florida, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGMoffit Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGEmory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITING...and 185 more locations