Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Hydrus and iStent combined with Phacoemulsyfication in Open Angle Glaucoma Patients a Long-Term Follow-Up
Purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of two micro-invasive glaucoma surgery devices: Hydrus Microstent and iStent Trabecular Bypass in combination with cataract phacoemulsification in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. We additionally analyze the impact of preoperative factors on achieving surgical success in both surgical methods.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
65
Cataract phacoemulsification with implantation of an artificial posterior chamber lens insertion into the capsular bag was first performed and subsequently the implantation of the Hydrus microscent was undertaken using a direct gonioscope lens. The injector ended with a cannula with a Hydrus microimplant was introduced through the same temporal incision that was used during the cataract stage.
Cataract phacoemulsification with implantation of an artificial posterior chamber lens insertion into the capsular bag was first performed and subsequently the implantation of the iStent implantation a 23 gauge applicator was used. iStent was gently advanced through the tra-becular meshwork and placed in the Schelmm's Canal in the inferior nasal position (3:00 to 4:00 hours in the right eye, 8:00 to 9:00 hours in the left eye).
Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute
Warsaw, Mazovian, Poland
IOP
Intraocular Pressure
Time frame: 10 years
BCVA
The change of best- corrected visual acuity
Time frame: 10 years
Medications
Median number of patients who took medications before surgery and up until the end of the study
Time frame: 10 years
CCT
Central corneal thickness
Time frame: 10 years
Visual Field
Visual Field of the mean defect
Time frame: 10 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.