Piriformis muscle syndrome (PMS) is characterized by symptoms caused by compression or irritation of the sciatic nerve by the piriformis muscle as it exits the sciatic notch. PMS commonly evokes the symptoms of sciatica and is likely underdisagnosed. Patients who experience pain related to piriformis syndrome will complain of aggravated pain after prolonged periods of sitting or upon rising from a seated position. Around 98% of patients evoke positional buttock pain, especially during prolonged sitting (car journeys, for example). This is less true for sciatic pain radiation, which is still found in 63% of cases, systematically associated with the notion of buttock pain. Treatments for PMS aim to reduce or eliminate sciatic pain and also control buttock pain. Reducing these pains can improve the physical condition and emotional state of the patient. Several approaches have been proposed including physical therapy (massage-physiotherapy, self-rehabilitation techniques) combined with the use of anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics and muscle relaxants to reduce inflammation, spasm and pain. Many patients do not respond to conventional care. Surgery may be considered only in those cases who do not improve with conservative therapy or injections. However, decompressive surgery is an invasive treatment, indicated in case of complete failure of all medical strategies, with physical and functional consequences. In recent years, several published studies showed the use of botulinum toxin (BT) injection as a new therapeutic option to reduce buttock and sciatic pain induced by PMS. The study team previously observed the efficacy of BT/A1 administration into the piriformis muscle in patients who were previously treated with medication and rehabilitation protocols with no pain improvement. Pain relief was considered as "very good" or "good" for 77% of the patients, "average" for 7.4% and "poor" for 15.6%. No adverse events were reported. More recently, Fishman and colleagues reported the results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled study including 56 patients and comparing physical therapy, incobotulinum toxin A and placebo. Data are sparse concerning BT injection for PMS and no multicenter randomized clinical trial have been performed. Two out of three randomized trials (Fishman 2004, 2017) are based on highly selected patients (3 standard deviations or more beyond on the prolongation of the posterior tibial or fibular nerve H-reflex in FAIR test). Therefore, BT efficacy may be overestimated and remains to be evaluated among unselected PMS patients, regardless of analgesic treatments or physical therapy. Finally, no randomized studies have reported the heatlh-related quality of life of PMS patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
108
Incobotulinumtoxin type A (200 U in 2 mL of preservative-free normal saline) will be injected in equally divided doses (1mL; 100 U for incobotulinumtoxin A) into 2 locations in the affected buttock region
Placebo (normal saline solution and excipients described in Xeomin) will be injected in equally divided doses (1mL) into 2 locations in the affected buttock region
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Nîmes, Gard, France
CHU de Besançon
Besançon, France
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, France
Hôpital Universitaire Paris Cochin
Paris, France
Institut Universitaire de Réadaptation Clémenceau
Strasbourg, France
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, France
Change in sciatic pain
Measured on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) visual analog scale
Time frame: From baseline to Week 6
Change in buttock pain intensity
Measured on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) visual analog scale
Time frame: From baseline to Week 6
Health-related quality of life
EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire measuring five items representing the five dimensions, and a visual analog scale graduated from 0 to 100 (100 referring to the "best possible state of health"). For each dimension, patients indicate their current state of health to generated a 5-digit number describing the health status (e.g., health status "11111" indicates the absence of problems in each dimension)
Time frame: Baseline
Health-related quality of life
EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire measuring five items representing the five dimensions, and a visual analog scale graduated from 0 to 100 (100 referring to the "best possible state of health"). For each dimension, patients indicate their current state of health to generated a 5-digit number describing the health status (e.g., health status "11111" indicates the absence of problems in each dimension)
Time frame: Week 6
Health-related quality of life
EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire measuring five items representing the five dimensions, and a visual analog scale graduated from 0 to 100 (100 referring to the "best possible state of health"). For each dimension, patients indicate their current state of health to generated a 5-digit number describing the health status (e.g., health status "11111" indicates the absence of problems in each dimension)
Time frame: Week 12
Health-related quality of life
EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire measuring five items representing the five dimensions, and a visual analog scale graduated from 0 to 100 (100 referring to the "best possible state of health"). For each dimension, patients indicate their current state of health to generated a 5-digit number describing the health status (e.g., health status "11111" indicates the absence of problems in each dimension)
Time frame: Week 18
Health-related quality of life
EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire measuring five items representing the five dimensions, and a visual analog scale graduated from 0 to 100 (100 referring to the "best possible state of health"). For each dimension, patients indicate their current state of health to generated a 5-digit number describing the health status (e.g., health status "11111" indicates the absence of problems in each dimension)
Time frame: Week 24
Sciatic pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Baseline
Sciatic pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 3
Sciatic pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 6
Sciatic pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 9
Sciatic pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 12
Sciatic pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 15
Sciatic pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 18
Sciatic pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 21
Sciatic pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 24
Buttock pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Baseline
Buttock pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 3
Buttock pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 6
Buttock pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 9
Buttock pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 12
Buttock pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 15
Buttock pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 18
Buttock pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 21
Buttock pain intensity
Assessed on Visual Analog Scale value (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time frame: Week 24
Physical functioning
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form; 9-item questionnaire, where Worst Pain Score: 1 - 4 = Mild Pain; Worst Pain Score: 5 - 6 = Moderate Pain; Worst Pain Score: 7 - 10 = Severe Pain
Time frame: Baseline
Physical functioning
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form; 9-item questionnaire, where Worst Pain Score: 1 - 4 = Mild Pain; Worst Pain Score: 5 - 6 = Moderate Pain; Worst Pain Score: 7 - 10 = Severe Pain
Time frame: Week 6
Physical functioning
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form; 9-item questionnaire, where Worst Pain Score: 1 - 4 = Mild Pain; Worst Pain Score: 5 - 6 = Moderate Pain; Worst Pain Score: 7 - 10 = Severe Pain
Time frame: Week 12
Physical functioning
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form; 9-item questionnaire, where Worst Pain Score: 1 - 4 = Mild Pain; Worst Pain Score: 5 - 6 = Moderate Pain; Worst Pain Score: 7 - 10 = Severe Pain
Time frame: Week 18
Physical functioning
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form; 9-item questionnaire, where Worst Pain Score: 1 - 4 = Mild Pain; Worst Pain Score: 5 - 6 = Moderate Pain; Worst Pain Score: 7 - 10 = Severe Pain
Time frame: Week 24
Perceived change in condition in response to therapy
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
Time frame: Baseline
Perceived change in condition in response to therapy
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
Time frame: Week 6
Perceived change in condition in response to therapy
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
Time frame: Week 12
Perceived change in condition in response to therapy
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
Time frame: Week 18
Perceived change in condition in response to therapy
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
Time frame: Week 24
Emotional distress
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items, with responses scored on a scale of 0-3 (3 indicates higher symptom frequencies). Subscales (anxiety and depression) range from 0 to 21 whereby: normal 0-7, mild 8-10, moderate 11-14, and severe 15-21.
Time frame: Baseline
Emotional distress
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items, with responses scored on a scale of 0-3 (3 indicates higher symptom frequencies). Subscales (anxiety and depression) range from 0 to 21 whereby: normal 0-7, mild 8-10, moderate 11-14, and severe 15-21.
Time frame: Week 6
Emotional distress
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items, with responses scored on a scale of 0-3 (3 indicates higher symptom frequencies). Subscales (anxiety and depression) range from 0 to 21 whereby: normal 0-7, mild 8-10, moderate 11-14, and severe 15-21.
Time frame: Week 12
Emotional distress
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items, with responses scored on a scale of 0-3 (3 indicates higher symptom frequencies). Subscales (anxiety and depression) range from 0 to 21 whereby: normal 0-7, mild 8-10, moderate 11-14, and severe 15-21.
Time frame: Week 18
Emotional distress
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items, with responses scored on a scale of 0-3 (3 indicates higher symptom frequencies). Subscales (anxiety and depression) range from 0 to 21 whereby: normal 0-7, mild 8-10, moderate 11-14, and severe 15-21.
Time frame: Week 24
Disability for low back pain
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): range 0 to 100. Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
Time frame: Baseline
Disability for low back pain
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): range 0 to 100. Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
Time frame: Week 6
Disability for low back pain
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): range 0 to 100. Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
Time frame: Week 12
Disability for low back pain
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): range 0 to 100. Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
Time frame: Week 18
Disability for low back pain
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): range 0 to 100. Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
Time frame: Week 24
Tolerance of the sitting position
Time between the beginning of the sitting position and the onset or worsening of the pain
Time frame: Baseline
Tolerance of the sitting position
Time between the beginning of the sitting position and the onset or worsening of the pain
Time frame: Week 6
Tolerance of the sitting position
Time between the beginning of the sitting position and the onset or worsening of the pain
Time frame: Week 12
Tolerance of the sitting position
Time between the beginning of the sitting position and the onset or worsening of the pain
Time frame: Week 18
Tolerance of the sitting position
Time between the beginning of the sitting position and the onset or worsening of the pain
Time frame: Week 24
Consumption of painkillers
Number of level 1 to 3 analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and muscle relaxants
Time frame: Week 24
Number of patients requiring a second injection botulinum toxin in each arm
Number
Time frame: Week 12
Side effects of injection
Side effects of the injection or attributable to the study drug
Time frame: Week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.