This study collects data from patients undergoing minimally invasive, image-guided cancer treatments at participating hospitals in the Netherlands and France. All treatments are performed as standard clinical care and include procedures such as tumor ablation and catheter-based treatments of cancer in the liver, kidney, lung, and bone. During these procedures, a spectral angio-CT system is used for image guidance. This advanced CT scanner automatically captures additional imaging information beyond what is used in routine clinical decision-making. The goal of this study is to investigate how this additional imaging information is associated with treatment outcomes, and how it can be used in the future to improve treatment planning, procedural guidance, and prediction of treatment results. No experimental interventions are performed. Participation does not alter the treatment or follow-up patients receive. Data are collected from medical records and imaging systems and stored securely for analysis.
Interventional oncology (IO) is an established component of cancer care, offering minimally invasive, image-guided treatments for solid tumors in organs such as the liver, kidney, lung, and musculoskeletal system. IO procedures include percutaneous techniques such as thermal ablation, as well as catheter-based approaches such as transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization. Compared to surgical approaches, these procedures are associated with lower morbidity and mortality, shorter hospital admissions, and lower costs. Medical imaging plays a central role throughout the IO workflow, from diagnosis and treatment planning to procedural guidance and post-treatment assessment. One major advancement in this context is the integration of angiography and CT into a single angio-CT system, allowing seamless transitions between real-time fluoroscopy and high-resolution cross-sectional imaging during procedures. The newest generation of angio-CT systems incorporates spectral CT technology, which enables energy-resolved imaging through dual-layer detector technology. This simultaneously acquires spectral data while providing conventional CT reconstructions, allowing standard workflow and image interpretation to remain unchanged while spectral information is available as additional imaging data. Spectral CT has the potential to enhance lesion detection and tissue characterization, reduce metal artifacts, and improve the accuracy of treatment evaluation compared with conventional CT. All procedures are performed according to standard clinical care at the participating centers. Study participation does not influence clinical decision-making, treatment strategy, or follow-up. No experimental interventions are performed. This is a prospective, observational, multicenter, international registry study coordinated by Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). Participating centers include Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC, the Netherlands), Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL, France), and Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP, France). The study is part of the EU-funded PreciseOnco project, which aims to further integrate and optimize imaging and guidance technologies within clinical IO workflows.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
2,000
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital Édouard Herriot
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris - Hôpital Henri Mondor
Créteil, Île-de-France Region, France
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands
Local tumor control
Local tumor control at the treated site, assessed at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after the procedure.
Time frame: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
Overall survival
Time from the index procedure to death from any cause.
Time frame: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
Progression-free survival
Time from the index procedure to disease progression or death from any cause.
Time frame: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
Ablation margin and embolization completeness
Assessment of ablation margins and completeness of embolization using spectral CT imaging, compared to standard CT reconstructions.
Time frame: At time of procedure
Incidence of periprocedural adverse events
Periprocedural complications and adverse events graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 6 (CTCAEv6).
Time frame: 30 days after procedure
Procedure duration
Duration of the procedure to evaluate the workflow.
Time frame: At time of procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.