This study will examine the feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of a bundle of smartphone-based tools for lowering overdose risk. 40 participants will be enrolled and can expect to be on study for up to 9 months.
As a pilot study, this study is not designed to rigorously evaluate the effect of the intervention (i.e., health-related biomedical or behavioral outcome) on participants. Rather, the sample size will allow determination of feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and secondarily, will allow quantification of preliminary effect size to aid in future trial planning. After enrolling in the study, participants will receive a mobile phone with an unlimited data plan. After receiving the phone, participants will receive a brief orientation to a bundle of phone and internet-based overdose prevention tools. This includes overdose crisis hotlines, mail-order overdose prevention supplies, and a mobile health app that has been adapted for people who use drugs to support self-determined motivation for reaching goals through educational content, social engagement, and peer-to-peer support. Each month for 6 months, participants will also complete a 20-30 minute survey evaluating the primary and secondary outcomes (described below) and use of each phone and internet-based tool that is part of the enhanced harm reduction bundle. 25 participants will also be invited to complete a 45-60 minute semi-structured in-depth interview about their experience participating in the study and use of the phone- and internet-based tools. Primary analyses will seek to describe the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of the overdose prevention service model. Secondarily, changes in overdose risk behaviors and experiences over the 6-month study period relative to baseline will be analyzed. Primary Objective: to evaluate feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of an enhanced harm reduction service model incorporating internet and/or mobile health tools to reduce overdose risk for people who use opioid and/or stimulant drugs. Secondary Objective: to understand overdose risk behaviors before and after the intervention.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
40
Mobile health app, bundled with other harm reduction internet and phone resources
UW School of Medicine and Public Health
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
RECRUITINGAcceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) measures intervention acceptability with 4 items ranked on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Participants will be asked the 4-item questionnaire for each tool offered in the bundle (3). Scores are averaged across the measure for each tool and subsequently scores for individual tools will be summed to generate a composite acceptability score of the program. Scores can range from 3-15, with higher scores meaning higher acceptability of the intervention
Time frame: up to 6 months
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) measures intervention appropriateness with 4 items ranked on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Participants will be asked the 4-item questionnaire for each tool offered in the bundle (3). Scores are averaged across the measure for each tool and subsequently scores for individual tools will be summed to generate a composite appropriateness score of the program. Scores can range from 3-15, with higher scores meaning higher appropriateness of the intervention.
Time frame: up to 6 months
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) measures intervention feasibility with 4 items ranked on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Participants will be asked the 4-item questionnaire for each tool offered in the bundle (3). Scores are averaged across the measure for each tool and subsequently scores for individual tools will be summed to generate a composite feasibility score of the program. Scores can range from 3-15, with higher scores meaning higher feasibility of the intervention.
Time frame: up to 6 months
Change in the Number of Risk Days from baseline to 6 months
This data will be collected using the Overdose Risk Behavior Scale (ORBS) instrument which provides a comprehensive index of proximal opioid-related overdose risks. At baseline and study completion, participants will complete the ORBS assessment. The ORBS assessment will be administered to assess the potential effect of the intervention on the frequency of overdose risk behaviors. The average change in the self reported risk days on this instrument from baseline to six months will be reported as the outcome.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: baseline, 6 months