This is a phase II/III, multicenter, randomized, three-arm, open-label, parallel controlled trial. The primary objective of this study is to compare the 2-years OS rate of the LDA, LHAA, and LA regimens in newly diagnosed patients with intermediate- and high-risk acute myeloid leukemia who are eligible for intensive chemotherapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
450
Lisaftoclax (200 mg on D2, 400 mg on D3, and 600 mg qd on D4-8, orally) + daunorubicin (60 mg/m², iv, qd, D1-3) + cytarabine (100 mg/m², q12h, subcutaneous injection or iv infusion, D1-7).
Lisaftoclax (200 mg on D2, 400 mg on D3, and 600 mg qd on D4-8, orally) + homoharringtonine (2 mg/m², qd, intramuscular injection or iv infusion, D1-5) + cytarabine (100 mg/m², q12h, subcutaneous injection or iv infusion, D1-5) + aclarubicin (12 mg/m², maximum 20 mg, iv, D1-5).
Lisaftoclax (200 mg, orally, D1; 400 mg, orally, D2; 600 mg, orally, qd, D3-28) + azacitidine (75 mg/m², D1-7)
Lisaftoclax (600 mg, orally, D1-7) + intermediate-dose cytarabine (2 g/m², q12h, D1-3) for 3 cycles
Post-transplant maintenance therapy: patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either combination therapy or azacitidine monotherapy. The combination regimen consisted of lisaftoclax (400 mg, orally, D1-7) in combination with azacitidine (50 mg/m², D1-7) for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first. Azacitidine monotherapy consisted of azacitidine (50 mg/m², D1-7) for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first. Non-transplant maintenance therapy: lisaftoclax (400 mg, orally, D1-7) in combination with azacitidine (50 mg/m², D1-7) for up to 1 year or 10 cycles, whichever occurred first.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
2-year overall survival rate (OS)
defined as the proportion of patients who were still alive from the time of randomization for the last patient until 24 months later
Time frame: from randomization up to 2 years
Complete Response (CR) rate after 1/2 treatment cycles
defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete response (CR) after the first or second cycle of induction chemotherapy.
Time frame: At the end of Cycle 1 or Cycle 2 of induction chemotherapy (each cycle is 28 days)
Composite Complete Response (CRc) rate after 1/2 treatment cycles
defined as the proportion of patients achieving CRc after the first or second cycle of induction chemotherapy.
Time frame: At the end of Cycle 1 or Cycle 2 of induction chemotherapy (each cycle is 28 days)
Minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate after 1-2 cycles of induction chemotherapy
defined as the the proportion of patients with negative minimal residual disease (MRD) among patients who achieve complete remission after 1-2 cycles of induction chemotherapy
Time frame: At the end of Cycle 1 or Cycle 2 of induction chemotherapy (each cycle is 28 days)
2-year event-free survival (EFS) rate
defined as the proportion of patients remaining free of treatment failure, hematologic relapse, MRD relapse, or death within 2 years after randomization.
Time frame: from randomization up to 2 years after randomization
2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate
defined as the proportion of patients who achieved complete response (CR) or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) and remained alive without disease relapse within 2 years after achieving response.
Time frame: from the date of complete remission (CR/CRi) up to 2 years after achieving response
Safety and Tolerability
defined as the number of participants with adverse events and serious adverse events as assessed by NCI CTCAE v5.0
Time frame: up to 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.