QH101 is an allogeneic TCR-enhanced Vδ2 T cell therapy product engineered to express BTN protein-specific binding elements on the cell surface. This innovative approach harnesses the natural cytotoxic capabilities of Vδ2 T cells while augmenting their ability to recognize BTN proteins, thereby significantly improving tumor cell elimination efficiency. Notably, QH101 is designed without co-stimulatory signal domains or the CD3ζ domain, which prevents T cell exhaustion from overactivation and effectively enhances in vivo persistence.
This is an early-phase clinical study conducted to initially evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary biological activity of QH101, an allogeneic TCR-enhanced Vδ2 T cell therapy, in patients with advanced solid tumors who have exhausted standard treatment options. The study adopts an open-label, non-randomized design to fully observe the in vivo performance of QH101, which is engineered to express BTN protein-specific binding elements without co-stimulatory signal domains or the CD3ζ domain. Prior to QH101 infusion, eligible patients will receive a standardized lymphodepletion regimen to create a favorable immune microenvironment for the homing, expansion, and persistence of infused Vδ2 T cells. QH101 will be administered via intravenous infusion, with a gradual dose-escalation strategy implemented to explore the safe dose range. Throughout the study, patients will undergo close clinical monitoring to track any adverse events associated with the therapy, with a particular focus on immune-related toxicities and infusion-related reactions, given the unique design of QH101 that avoids T cell exhaustion from overactivation. In addition to safety monitoring, the study will collect serial peripheral blood samples at predefined time points to assess the in vivo persistence, activation status, and tissue homing potential of QH101. Correlative studies will be conducted to explore the interaction between QH101 and the tumor microenvironment, especially the binding efficiency of BTN protein-specific binding elements to tumor-expressed BTN2A1/BTN3A1, as well as the relationship between the in vivo dynamics of QH101 and preliminary antitumor activity. The primary goal of this early clinical research is to confirm the safety profile of QH101, determine the feasible dose range for subsequent studies, and obtain preliminary evidence of its biological activity, including in vivo persistence and tumor-targeting capability. The findings from this study will lay a solid foundation for the further clinical development of QH101, providing critical insights into its potential as a novel cellular therapy for advanced solid tumors.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
7
dose escalation (3+3) : dose 1 (1×107enTCR Vδ2T cells) , dose 2 (3×107enTCR Vδ2T cells), dose 3 (6×107enTCR Vδ2T cells)
Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
AEs
Adverse events (AEs) are defined as any adverse medical events occurring from the onset of lumbar puncture catheter implantation in subjects (for subjects who had an Ommaya reservoir implanted before enrollment, events are recorded from the start of cell infusion) up to 12 months after the completion of QH101 infusion. Among these, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are graded according to the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) standards; graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is graded according to the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium definitions. Other AEs are graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v5.0).
Time frame: From the date of the subject's signing of the informed consent to one year following completion of treatment.
Neurological function assessment
Neurological function assessment is performed using the NANO scale. The NANO scale (see Appendix 2 for the NANO scale) assesses subjects' neurological symptoms across 9 domains: gait, muscle strength, upper limb ataxia, sensory function, visual field, facial strength, speech, consciousness status, and daily performance.Relative to the baseline or previous assessment, a total score change of -1 to +1 is defined as stable symptoms, a change of -2 to -3 as worsened symptoms, and a change of +2 to +3 as improved symptoms.
Time frame: Prior to cell infusion, and at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 post-infusion.
Cerebrospinal fluid cytology assessment
Cerebrospinal fluid tumor cell assessment and cerebrospinal fluid biochemical testing for cerebrospinal fluid cytology evaluation CSF cytological results are evaluated using a binary classification system. Negative results are defined as true negative or atypical, while positive results are defined as true positive or suspicious positive.
Time frame: Prior to cell infusion, and at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 post-infusion.
Neuroimaging Assessment
Neuroimaging assessment through imaging studies
Time frame: Prior to cell infusion, and at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 post-infusion.
Quality of life assessment
Use the M.D. Anderson Symptom Assessment Scale for Brain Tumors (MDASI-BT) to assess the quality of life for all enrolled subjects.
Time frame: Prior to cell infusion, and at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 post-infusion.
Pharmacokinetics(PK)
Changes in the number of γδ T cells, their subsets/differentiation/exhaustion, and cytokines in cerebrospinal fluid
Time frame: Prior to cell infusion, and at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 post-infusion.
Pharmacodynamics (PD)
Changes in the number of γδ T cells, cell subsets/differentiation/exhaustion, and cytokines in cerebrospinal fluid
Time frame: Prior to cell infusion, and at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 post-infusion.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.