This clinical trial tests the feasibility of patient reported outcomes monitoring with early, rapid immunotherapy toxicity subspecialty care to improve side effect management for patients with melanoma receiving an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma, but their use is frequently complicated by immune related adverse events (irAEs). IrAEs can affect any organ system, range in severity from mild to life threatening, and often require a pause or stopping of immunotherapy treatment. Early identification and management of irAEs may reduce progression to severe toxicity. Electronic patient self reporting of symptoms with ways to support early involvement of non oncology subspecialists may be a feasible way to improve side effect management for patients with melanoma receiving an immune checkpoint inhibitor.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Determine the feasibility of an electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO)-based symptom monitoring and subspecialty care referral intervention for identifying and managing irAEs in patients with melanoma. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate intervention acceptability for key stakeholders, including patients, caregivers, oncologists, and subspecialists. II. Describe the preliminary efficacy of the intervention to improve management of irAEs. OUTLINE: Patients complete an ePRO assessment, where they rate the frequency and/or severity of symptoms that may indicate a moderate to severe irAE, weekly for 6 months. If a patient rates a symptom at a frequency or severity level of moderate or higher, a care provider is notified and determines if the symptoms warrant evaluation by a non-oncology subspecialist or can be managed by medical oncology. Patients receive a referral to an appropriate subspecialist, complete an evaluation of the suspected irAE, within 14 days of the referral, and receive standard of care treatment. Patients may optionally have their caregiver enroll to complete an intervention acceptability survey.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
Ancillary studies
Receive access to ePRO tool
Receive review of symptoms and referral if needed
Complete ePRO assessments
Ancillary studies
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Portland, Oregon, United States
Proportion of eligible patients who consent to the study and begin the intervention (feasibility of study enrollment)
Will estimate the proportion of patients enrolled with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: At enrollment
Proportion of patients evaluated by subspecialists in ≤ 14 days among participants who enrolled and developed a suspected immune related adverse events (irAE) (grade 2 or higher) (feasibility of intervention delivery)
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months
Proportion of patients who complete data collection at 6 months (retention)
Will estimate the proportion of patients retained in the study and adherent to electronic patient reported outcomes with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: At month 6
Proportion of weeks a Patient Reported Outcome-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events questionnaire was completed out of the number of weeks since starting the intervention (ePRO adherence)
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months
Proportion of participants rating the study as acceptable (acceptability)
Assessed via adapted from Basch et al's survey. Acceptability is defined as a mean summary score of 3 or higher.
Time frame: At 6 months
Proportion of caregivers for enrolled participants rate the study as acceptable (acceptability)
Assessed via adapted from Basch et al's survey. Acceptability is defined as a mean summary score of 3 or higher.
Time frame: At 6 months
Proportion of medical oncologists/subspecialists rate the study as acceptable (acceptability)
Assessed via clinician experience measure.
Time frame: At end of the study, up to 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.