People with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) often experience frequent and severe nosebleeds that can disrupt daily life and lead to anemia, medical procedures, and reduced quality of life. This study is testing a new nasal ointment called TOR-582, which contains sirolimus, to determine whether it can be used safely when applied inside the nose. Adults with HHT and frequent nosebleeds will be invited to participate. Participants will first complete one week of observation without treatment, followed by up to 12 weeks of applying the study ointment inside each nostril twice daily. Different participants will receive different strengths of the ointment so researchers can identify the safest dose. During the study, participants will attend study visits, complete questionnaires about their nosebleeds and quality of life, keep a daily nosebleed diary, undergo nasal examinations, and have blood tests to monitor safety and medication levels. The information gained from this study will help determine whether this topical treatment can be safely studied further and will support the development of a new, less invasive option for managing nosebleeds in people with HHT.
This is a Phase I single-center trial evaluating the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of TOR-582 in adults with HHT-associated epistaxis. The study will include a Phase 1a Dose-Finding study and a preliminary Proof-of-Concept protocol. The study will employ a Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) dose-finding design with accelerated titration. Phase 1a will commence with topical administration of the TOR-582 compound in the nasal cavity, starting with a 1% dose (.2mL, dose level 2) delivered twice daily for a 12-week dosing period. Participants will complete a 1-week observational baseline period prior to initiation of treatment. The first 4 weeks of treatment will constitute the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation period. Participants who complete the DLT evaluation period will continue treatment for an additional 8 weeks, for a total treatment duration of 12 weeks. The study will enroll up to 27 participants. Patients who fail to complete the dosing regimen for at least 80% of assigned dosages in their assigned cycle of treatment for reasons other than DLT will be excluded from DLT evaluation and may be replaced.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
27
The active formulation of TOR-582 incorporates sirolimus at concentrations of 5 mg/mL (0.5%), 10 mg/mL (1.0%), and 20 mg/mL (2.0%) along with other active ingredients in an oil-based carrier ointment. Ointment will be applied intranasally twice daily in 0.2mL applications using TC5-R - Topi-CLICK Micro® 5 mL devices, which dispense metered 0.05 mL doses. Dose finding will begin at a dose of 10 mg/mL (1.0%). Doses will escalate sequentially across planned dose levels (Level 1: 5 mg/mL, Level 2: 10 mg/mL, Level 3: 20 mg/mL) as guided by the BOIN-AT design until the Maximum Tolerated Dose is identified.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs)
The occurrence of protocol-defined DLTs during the active treatment at each dose level, used to guide escalation/de-escalation decisions and determine the recommended Phase 1b dose. A DLT is defined as the occurrence of Grade 2 or higher AEs in greater than 25% of participants at a given dose level, or more than one Grade 3 or higher AE at any point in the trial.
Time frame: From enrollment through the first 4 weeks of treatment for each cohort (the DLT evaluation window)
Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs)
The aggregate count of participants experiencing AEs across the entire 12-week treatment period.
Time frame: From enrollment through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
Severity of treatment-emergent adverse events, graded according to the NCI CTCAE v6.0.
The highest severity grade of clinical AEs experienced by each participant. The CTCAE scale ranges from Grade 1 (Mild) to Grade 5 (Death), where higher grades indicate greater clinical severity.
Time frame: From enrollment through the first 4 weeks of treatment for each cohort (the DLT evaluation window)
Whole blood sirolimus trough concentrations
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks of treatment, and at the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Epistaxis severity, measured by the Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS)
Trends in the ESS at baseline and during and after treatment will quantify changes in bleeding burden. The ESS ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater severity.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
Patient-reported frequency of epistaxis episodes
Recorded as frequency of entries in the Cure HHT Diary and averaged over 28-day periods to supplement the ESS.
Time frame: Recorded daily from beginning of screening period through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
Patient-reported duration of epistaxis episodes
Recorded via Cure HHT Diary on a six-tiered scale, with a minimum duration of \<1 minute and a maximum of \>60 minutes.
Time frame: Recorded daily from beginning of screening period through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
Patient-reported intensity of epistaxis episodes
Recorded via Cure HHT Diary on a scale ranging from 1 ("spotting") to 6 ("gushing") and averaged over 28-day periods to supplement the ESS. Higher scores indicate greater intensity.
Time frame: Recorded daily from beginning of screening period through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
Patient-reported overall severity of epistaxis episodes
Recorded via Cure HHT Diary on a scale ranging from 1 to 10 and averaged over 28-day periods to supplement the ESS. Higher scores indicate greater overall severity.
Time frame: Recorded daily from beginning of screening period through end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks.
Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) score, adapted for epistaxis
The subjective assessment of nosebleed severity, as measured using adapted items from the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. Participants will be asked: "Overall, how would you rate your nosebleeds now?", with response options ranging from 1 ("Excellent - no nosebleeds") to 6 ("Very Poor - nosebleeds are constant or severely disruptive"). Higher scores indicate greater severity.
Time frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks).
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) score, adapted for epistaxis.
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) score, adapted for epistaxis. The subjective assessment of treatment-related change in nosebleed severity, as measured using adapted items from the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. Participants will be asked: "Overall, how would you rate your nosebleeds since starting the treatment with this ointment?", with response options ranging from 1 ("much better") to 7 ("much worse"). Higher scores indicate less improvement.
Time frame: Every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
Clinical Global Impression - Quality of Life (CGI-QoL) score, adapted for epistaxis.
The subjective assessment of the impact of nosebleeds on quality of life, as measured using adapted items from the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. Participants will be asked: "Overall, how would you rate how much your nosebleeds affect your overall quality of life?", with response options ranging from 1 ("not at all") to 6 ("extreme"). Higher scores indicate greater impact on quality of life.
Time frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
HHT-Specific Quality of Life (QoL)
Participants will complete a 4-item, validated HHT-specific QoL questionnaire designed to assess the functional impact of HHT-related epistaxis. Each item is scored from 0 (never) to 4 (very often), yielding a total score ranging from 0 (no limitations) to 16 (severe limitations). Higher scores indicate more severe limitations of quality of life.
Time frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
Modified QoL-HHT score
The QoL-HHT is a 24-item, disease-specific questionnaire that quantifies multi-faceted impact of HHT on individual patient lives. Each statement is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "strongly disagree" to 5 = "strongly agree." Items are categorized into six validated domains: physical limitations (PL), social relationships (SR), concern about bleeding (CAB), relationship with the medical profession (RMP), experience of symptoms (ES), and concern about disease evolution (ED). This trial will use a modified 8-item QoL-HHT score by selecting specified items focused particularly on the overall burden of epistaxis in each participant's daily life, with higher scores indicating greater burden.
Time frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities, measured by PROMIS® Short Form 8a v2.0
This is one of three short-form questionnaires from the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) which will be used to evaluate the impact of treatment on overall well-being and functioning. Each form yields a standardized T-score generated via the PROMIS® scoring engine, allowing comparison to a normative population (mean = 50, SD = 10). This 8-item measure evaluates satisfaction with social participation and daily responsibilities. Items include statements such as: "I am satisfied with my ability to do regular daily activities." Higher T-scores indicate greater satisfaction with social roles.
Time frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
Depression, measured by PROMIS® Short Form 8b v1.0
This is one of three short-form questionnaires from the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) which will be used to evaluate the impact of treatment on overall well-being and functioning. Each form yields a standardized T-score generated via the PROMIS® scoring engine, allowing comparison to a normative population (mean = 50, SD = 10). This 8-item form assesses depressive symptoms experienced in the past 7 days, including feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and worthlessness. Higher T-scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
Time frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
Fatigue, measured by PROMIS® Short Form 6a v1.0
This is one of three short-form questionnaires from the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) which will be usde to evaluate the impact of treatment on overall well-being and functioning. Each form yields a standardized T-score generated via the PROMIS® scoring engine, allowing comparison to a normative population (mean = 50, SD = 10). This 6-item questionnaire measures fatigue severity and its interference with physical and social functioning. Items include: "How fatigued were you on average?" Higher T-scores reflect more severe fatigue.
Time frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)
The EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale is a validated, standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group to capture a participant's self-rated health status. Participants indicate their current overall health on a vertical scale ranging from 0 ("worst imaginable health") to 100 ("best imaginable health"), generating a single index value of health-related quality of life. Higher scores indicate greater health-related quality of life.
Time frame: At baseline, initiation of treatment, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
Patient Satisfaction with Treatment
Participants will be asked, "Overall, how satisfied are you with the ointment?", with answer choices ranging from 1 ("completely dissatisfied") to 7 ("completely satisfied"). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Time frame: At end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
Perceived treatment benefit and satisfaction, measured by Modified TTAQ.
Topical Therapy Adherence Questionnaire (TTAQ) and companion Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPQ) were developed by Zschocke et al. to identify patient- and treatment-related factors that influence adherence to topical therapies. This trial uses a modified 19-item version of the TTAQ, focusing specifically on the Treatment Satisfaction and Benefits to Patient domains and curated to minimize respondent burden and align with the use of topical sirolimus in the nasal mucosa. Participants rate their agreement with each item on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 ("strongly disagree") to 3 ("strongly agree"), where higher scores indicate greater treatment satisfaction and benefit to patient.
Time frame: At end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
Perceived treatment benefit and satisfaction, measured by Modified PPQ
The Topical Therapy Adherence Questionnaire (TTAQ) and companion Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPQ) were developed by Zschocke et al. to identify patient- and treatment-related factors that influence adherence to topical therapies. This trial uses a modified, 6-item version of the PPQ, focusing specifically on the Treatment Satisfaction and Benefits to Patient domains and curated to minimize respondent burden and align with our use of topical sirolimus in the nasal mucosa. Participants rate their agreement with each item on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 ("strongly disagree") to 3 ("strongly agree"), where higher scores indicate greater treatment satisfaction and benefit to patient.
Time frame: At end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
Hematologic Support Score (HSS)
The HSS is a composite measure that combines the assessment of red blood cell transfusion and iron infusion into a single endpoint, enabling evaluation over time. A higher number indicates greater transfusion/infusion burden.
Time frame: During screening and at end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
Hematologic Impact Score (HIS)
The HIS assesses the total hematologic impact over a reference time frame by accounting for changes in hemoglobin and HSS during that period (a higher number indicates greater improvement in hematologic status).
Time frame: During screening and at end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
Mean change in hemoglobin concentration from baseline
Measured via standard automated complete blood count (CBC).
Time frame: During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
Mean change in hematocrit from baseline
Measured via standard automated complete blood count (CBC).
Time frame: During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
Mean change in mean corpuscular volume (MCV) from baseline
Measured via standard automated complete blood count (CBC).
Time frame: During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
Mean change in serum ferritin from baseline
Measured via standard iron panel.
Time frame: During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
Mean change in transferrin saturation from baseline
Measured via standard iron panel.
Time frame: During screening and at the end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
Number of red blood cell transfusions and parenteral iron administrations during treatment period
Measured via patient reporting.
Time frame: Assessed during screening and at end of treatment, typically at 12 weeks
Endoscopic Disease Activity
Change in nasal telangiectasia severity, assessed by a modified HHT Endoscopy Score (HES). The HES is a clinician-administered scoring system used to assess the severity of nasal telangiectasias during endoscopic evaluation. For this study, five domains will be used: number of sites involved, vascular pattern, crusting, lesion location, and septal perforation. Each is scored from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more extensive disease.
Time frame: Assessed during screening, after first 4 weeks of treatment (end of DLT evaluation period), and end of treatment (typically at 12 weeks)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.