This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of the Carrot Technique and Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) for the management of horizontal alveolar ridge deficiency in patients requiring implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone. Twenty patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups. Clinical outcomes including implant stability and soft tissue healing, as well as radiographic outcomes including alveolar ridge width, bone density, and marginal bone loss, will be evaluated using clinical examinations and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) during a 12-month follow-up period..
The Carrot Technique is a minimally invasive approach that utilizes an autogenous bone core harvested during implant osteotomy and repositioned to augment the deficient buccal ridge. This technique may reduce donor-site morbidity while providing sufficient horizontal bone augmentation. Guided Bone Regeneration remains one of the most widely used techniques for horizontal ridge reconstruction through the use of bone substitute materials and barrier membranes. This randomized controlled clinical trial will compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Carrot Technique and GBR in patients presenting with horizontal ridge deficiency in the maxillary esthetic zone. Twenty patients requiring single-tooth implant rehabilitation will be randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group I will receive implant placement combined with the Carrot Technique, while Group II will receive implant placement combined with Guided Bone Regeneration. Clinical evaluations will include implant stability assessed by resonance frequency analysis, soft tissue healing using the Landry Healing Index, and peri-implant inflammation using the modified sulcus bleeding index. Radiographic evaluation will be performed using cone beam computed tomography immediately after surgery and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively to assess changes in alveolar ridge width, bone density, and marginal bone loss. The study aims to determine whether the Carrot Technique provides comparable or superior outcomes to GBR for horizontal ridge augmentation associated with implant placement.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
20
Implant placement with simultaneous horizontal ridge augmentation using an autogenous bone core harvested from the implant osteotomy site with a trephine drill and fixed buccally using osteosynthesis screws.
Implant placement with simultaneous horizontal ridge augmentation using bone substitute material and a collagen membrane according to guided bone regeneration principles.
Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Egypt
Change in Alveolar Ridge Width
Horizontal alveolar ridge width measured using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Changes in ridge width will be calculated by comparing measurements obtained immediately after surgery and at follow-up.
Time frame: baseline and 12 Months
Marginal Bone Loss
Marginal bone loss measured radiographically using CBCT using the implant as a reference.
Time frame: 12 Months
Soft Tissue Healing
Soft tissue healing assessed using the Landry Healing Index.
Time frame: 1 Week, 2 Weeks, and 1 Month
Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index
Peri-implant soft tissue inflammation assessed using the Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mBI).
Time frame: 1 Month and 12 Months
Bone Density
Buccal peri-implant bone density measured using CBCT and expressed in Hounsfield Units.
Time frame: 12 Months
Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ)
Implant stability assessed using resonance frequency analysis and expressed as Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ).
Time frame: At implant placement and 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.