Ultrasonographic evaluation of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is widely used in emergency and critical care settings for noninvasive assessment of intravascular volume status. The subcostal (SC) window is the standard approach; however, it is frequently limited by obesity, bowel distension, or postoperative anatomical changes. In such cases, the right coronal (RC) and anterior transhepatic (aTH) windows have been proposed as alternatives.
The existing literature presents conflicting results regarding the interchangeability of these windows. Several studies report significant discrepancies between SC and RC measurements, while others demonstrate strong agreement. Direct comparison of the SC and aTH windows has received considerably less attention, with only a single prospective study to date reporting reliable agreement between these approaches under standardized imaging criteria. Methodological heterogeneity, most likely arising from an unstandardized imaging technique, underlies much of the observed discordance. As a result, clinicians lack clear guidance on whether alternative windows can reliably substitute for the SC approach across diverse clinical settings.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
900
The intermethod agreement of IVC diameter and collapsibility index measurements
The intermethod agreement of IVC diameter and collapsibility index measurements obtained from the subcostal (SC), anterior transhepatic (aTH), and right coronal (RC) ultrasonographic windows under a standardized imaging protocol, and to determine whether aTH and RC windows can serve as reliable alternatives to the SC approach across diverse clinical settings and operator profiles.
Time frame: 90 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.