Patients with suspected DD who met the Rome IV criteria were divided into the DD group and other types of constipation groups. The differences between the two groups were analyzed to explore the precise diagnostic scheme for DD.
This study was conducted solely at the Army Specialized Medical Center and was a single-center, bidirectional cohort study. Patients with suspected dyssynergic defecation who visited the constipation specialty clinic of Daping Hospital were collected. After the patients signed the informed consent form, they were asked to fill out the questionnaire (general clinical data questionnaire, Wexner constipation rating scale, ODS rating scale, and constipation patient quality of life scale (PAC-QOL)). The baseline data of the patients (such as age, gender, symptoms, constipation scale scores, intestinal satisfaction scores, etc.) and the results of anorectal manometry, defecography, and perineal ultrasound were statistically analyzed. Patients meeting the Rome IV criteria were grouped through DFG, ARM, and pelvic floor ultrasound examination. The differences in clinical main symptoms, constipation scores, defecography, perineal ultrasound, etc. between the two groups were observed, and the roles and correlations of each parameter in diagnosis were analyzed.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
164
Analysis of inter-group differences
Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital)
Yuzhong, Chongqing Municipality, China
Rectal emptying rate,(%)
Rectal emptying rate is defined as the reduction in rectal area from pre-evacuation to post-evacuation, expressed as a percentage of the pre-evacuation area, as assessed by defecography.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Obstructed Defecation Syndrome score,(ODS score)
the minimum value is 0,and maximum value is 31; a higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score,(CCCS)
the minimum value is 0,and maximum value is 30; a higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life total score,(PAC-QOL score)
the minimum value is 0,and maximum value is 112; a higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Self-Rating Anxiety Scale score,(SAS score)
the minimum value is 25,and maximum value is 100; a higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Bristol Stool Form Scale score
the minimum value is 1,and maximum value is 7; a higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Body Mass Index
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Disease duration,(year)
Time frame: Baseline assessment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
ARA change on DFG,(°)
changes in anorectal angle during defecography
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Anal canal diameter on DFG,(mm)
anal canal diameter during straining on DFG
Time frame: Baseline assessment
PRS on DFG
Puborectalis syndrome indicated by the defecography diagnostic report.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
IRP on DFG
Internal rectal prolapse indicated by the defecography diagnostic report.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Rectocele on DFG
Rectocele indicated by the defecography diagnostic report.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Anal Resting Pressure,(mmHg)
Anal Resting Pressure measured by High-resolution Anorectal Manometry
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Anal Squeeze Pressure,(mmHg)
Anal Squeeze Pressure measured by High-resolution Anorectal Manometry
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Rectal propulsive pressure,(mmHg)
Rectal propulsive pressure measured by High-resolution Anorectal Manometry
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Anal relaxation rate,(%)
Anal relaxation rate measured by High-resolution Anorectal Manometry during defecation
Time frame: Baseline assessment
DD on HR-ARM
Dyssynergic defecation(DD) reported by high-resolution anorectal manometry parameters, with diagnostic criteria of rectal pressure during straining \>45mmHg and anal canal relaxation rate \<20%.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
ARA change on TPUS,(°)
changes in anorectal angle during evacuation measured by Transperineal Ultrasound
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Right PRM thickness change on TPUS,(mm)
Changes in right puborectalis muscle thickness during defecation measured by Transperineal Ultrasound
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Left PRM thickness change on TPUS,(mm)
Changes in left puborectalis muscle thickness during defecation measured by Transperineal Ultrasound
Time frame: Baseline assessment
PRS on TPUS
Puborectalis syndrome(PRS) indicated by the transperineal ultrasound diagnostic report
Time frame: Baseline assessment