SBRT delivers high-dose radiation to precisely defined target volumes and is an effective locally ablative treatment option for both primary tumours and oligometastases in various settings, including lesions in the abdomen or pelvis. However, SBRT in these regions faces considerable challenges such as inter-fractional organ motion and anatomical deformation, which can compromise treatment precision. MR-guided SBRT offers a solution, providing superior soft-tissue contrast and enabling real-time, online treatment plan adaptation over the course of SBRT. This approach reduces the risk of geographical miss and overdose to adjacent, vulnerable OARs. Currently, MR-guided SBRT uses a fixed dose per fraction, only adjusting target volume and OAR contours for anatomical changes when performing plan adaptation. However, overlaps between planning target volumes (PTVs) and dose-limiting OARs regularly require compromises in PTV coverage. To address this, AF aims to also adjust dose per fraction based on daily PTV-OAR overlap. With this approach, more dose is applied on treatment days with less PTV-OAR overlap while less dose is applied on days with more PTV-OAR overlap. This trial assesses the feasibility of AF in MR-guided SBRT for abdominal and pelvic tumours that show PTV-overlap with one or more dose-limiting OARs, ultimately aiming to enhance PTV dose coverage without increasing toxicity.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
The fraction dose to the PTV will be adapted based on the volume overlap of PTV and the dose-limiting OAR(s) (bowel / duodenum / stomach) on the planning MRI scan of the day ("geometry-of-the-day"). The treatment plan is then approved by the treating physician and independently verified according to department-internal standard. MR-guided fraction dose adaptation will be repeated at each of the 5 fractions, until the prescribed total dose is reached.
Patients that qualify for inclusion in the study but for whom AF is no viable treatment due to lacking PTV/OAR overlap in the planning scans. These patients are treated according to clinical standard of care (SoC), i.e. without dose adaptation, and function as a control group.
University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
RECRUITINGProportion of patients with successful daily dose adaptation
Proportion of patients treated with daily dose-adapted treatment, who received at least one fraction of non-uniformly fractionated treatment with expectation of a benefit in PTV-coverage of ≥ 1ccGy
Time frame: from enrollment to end of treatment at 1-2 weeks
Acute treatment toxicities
Acute treatment toxicities for all included patients measured with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
Time frame: during treatment (1-2 weeks) and until 90 days after
Interfractional variation in PTV/OAR overlap volume
interfractional variation in PTV/OAR overlap volume, in cc
Time frame: during treatment (1-2 weeks)
Interfractional variation in GTV/OAR distance
interfractional variation in GTV/OAR distance, in mm
Time frame: during treatment (1-2 weeks)
Dosimetric difference in PTV-coverage between algorithm-based calculation and the reference plan
PTV coverage quantified as the area above the dose-volume-histogram curve measured in cc x Gy
Time frame: after end of treatment (2 weeks after last fraction)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.