The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether a renin-guided antihypertensive treatment strategy is feasible to implement in community primary care clinics and to explore whether spironolactone improves blood pressure control in adults with low-renin hypertension. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is it feasible to identify, recruit, randomize, and follow adults with low-renin hypertension in a pragmatic primary care-based clinical trial? Does first-line treatment with spironolactone result in greater reductions in ambulatory blood pressure compared with standard first-line antihypertensive therapy among adults with low-renin hypertension? Researchers will compare spironolactone 25 mg daily with standard first-line antihypertensive therapy (candesartan, hydrochlorothiazide, or amlodipine) to determine whether spironolactone provides better blood pressure control in adults with low-renin hypertension. Participants will: Undergo blood pressure assessments, blood tests, and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) to determine eligibility. Be randomly assigned to receive either spironolactone or a standard first-line antihypertensive medication for 12 weeks. Complete follow-up visits and laboratory testing to monitor blood pressure response, kidney function, electrolyte levels, medication adherence, and side effects. Undergo repeat blood pressure measurements and ABPM at the end of the study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Spironolactone 25 mg daily: Spironolactone is a widely available and inexpensive MR antagonist medication which blocks the action of aldosterone. Spironolactone is the most commonly recommended drug for the treatment of primary aldosteronism given its efficacy in improving blood pressure and reducing cardiovascular and kidney disease risk for this patient population, with 25 mg being the standard starting dose.
Comparator medications were selected because they represent common guideline-recommended first-line antihypertensive therapies from mechanistically distinct drug classes routinely used in contemporary primary care practice and hypertension guidelines. Doses were selected based on equivalent defined daily doses (DDD). The purpose of including multiple comparator therapies is to emulate real-world first-line prescribing practices in primary care rather than compare spironolactone against a single mechanistic alternative.
Comparator medications were selected because they represent common guideline-recommended first-line antihypertensive therapies from mechanistically distinct drug classes routinely used in contemporary primary care practice and hypertension guidelines. Doses were selected based on equivalent defined daily doses (DDD). The purpose of including multiple comparator therapies is to emulate real-world first-line prescribing practices in primary care rather than compare spironolactone against a single mechanistic alternative.
Comparator medications were selected because they represent common guideline-recommended first-line antihypertensive therapies from mechanistically distinct drug classes routinely used in contemporary primary care practice and hypertension guidelines. Doses were selected based on equivalent defined daily doses (DDD). The purpose of including multiple comparator therapies is to emulate real-world first-line prescribing practices in primary care rather than compare spironolactone against a single mechanistic alternative.
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Ottawa Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinic
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
St-Isidore Médical
Saint Isidore, Ontario, Canada
GMF Universitaire Laval
Laval, Quebec, Canada
PRIMARY OUTCOME: Recruitment Rate of Randomized Participants per Month
Recruitment rate, defined as the average number of participants randomized per month during the recruitment period following activation of all participating study sites. Recruitment feasibility will be assessed by calculating the number of participants randomized each month over the 12-month recruitment period.
Time frame: 12 months following activation of all participating study sites
SECONDARY OUTCOME #1: Number of Potentially Eligible Participants Identified
Number of potentially eligible participants identified by participating primary care clinicians and referred for study screening.
Time frame: 12 months
SECONDARY OUTCOME #2: Eligibility Rate
Eligibility rate, defined as the proportion of screened participants who meet all study eligibility criteria. Calculated as the number of eligible participants divided by the number of screened participants.
Time frame: 12 months
SECONDARY OUTCOME #3: Recruitment Acceptance Rate
Recruitment acceptance rate, defined as the proportion of eligible participants who provide informed consent and undergo randomization. Calculated as the number of randomized participants divided by the number of eligible participants.
Time frame: 12 months
SECONDARY OUTCOME #4: Prevalence of Suppressed Renin Physiology
Proportion of screened participants with suppressed renin physiology, defined as a direct renin concentration \<6 ng/L (\<10 mU/L).
Time frame: 12 months
SECONDARY OUTCOME #5: Antihypertensive Washout Completion Rate
Proportion of participants for whom the protocol-specified antihypertensive washout procedures are successfully completed when applicable
Time frame: 12 months
SECONDARY OUTCOME #6: Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Completion Rate
Proportion of randomized participants who successfully complete ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) according to the study protocol.
Time frame: 12 weeks
SECONDARY OUTCOME #7: Protocol Adherence Rate
Proportion of randomized participants completing assigned study treatment and the Week 12 outcome assessment procedures according to the study protocol.
Time frame: 12 weeks
SECONDARY OUTCOME #8: Study Completion Rate
Proportion of randomized participants completing the Week 12 end-of-study assessment.
Time frame: 12 weeks
SECONDARY OUTCOME #9: Reasons for Non-participation, Treatment Discontinuation, and Study Withdrawal
Frequency and categorized reasons for declining participation, treatment discontinuation, and withdrawal from the study.
Time frame: 12 months
SECONDARY OUTCOME #10: Data Completeness
Proportion of required study data fields completed without missing or invalid values.
Time frame: 12 weeks
SECONDARY OUTCOME #11: Primary Care Clinician Satisfaction With Patient Participation
Primary care clinician satisfaction with their patients' participation in the study, assessed using a post-study questionnaire.
Time frame: end of study (at 12 months)
SECONDARY OUTCOME #12: Primary Care Clinician Satisfaction With Study Communication
Primary care clinician satisfaction regarding communication on participant progress and handover of care following study completion, assessed using a post-study questionnaire.
Time frame: end of study (at 12 months)
SECONDARY OUTCOME #13: Primary Care Clinician Engagement
Proportion of participating primary care clinicians who continue referring potentially eligible participants throughout the study period.
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.