A Phase IV Randomized Trial of Maxigesic® Versus Standard Analgesia After Radical Gastrectomy

Overview

Background: Radical gastrectomy causes moderate-to-severe pain during the first 48 hours after surgery. Opioids are effective but carry adverse effects and risks of prolonged use, so ERAS-based care recommends multimodal analgesia. Acetaminophen is the most commonly used non-opioid analgesic in gastrectomy patients; adding ibuprofen as a fixed-dose combination has shown improved analgesia and opioid-sparing effects compared with acetaminophen alone in other surgical populations, but direct evidence in gastrectomy patients is limited. Objective: To evaluate whether scheduled administration of an acetaminophen-ibuprofen fixed-dose combination (Maxigesic® IV) is superior to acetaminophen alone for pain relief after radical gastrectomy, with exploratory assessment of cost-effectiveness and of differences in analgesic efficacy according to genetic polymorphisms. Hypothesis: When given on an identical scheduled regimen, the acetaminophen-ibuprofen fixed-dose combination produces significantly lower pain scores (NRS) over the first 48 postoperative hours than acetaminophen alone (superiority). Study plan: This is a phase IV, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial in which 160 gastric cancer patients scheduled for minimally invasive radical gastrectomy (80 per arm) are randomized 1:1 with stratification by institution. In both arms, the assigned drug is given as a 15-minute intravenous infusion every 6 hours, starting 30 minutes before the end of surgery through 48 hours postoperatively. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in the time-weighted average (TWA) of repeatedly measured resting and active NRS over 48 hours, analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM); secondary endpoints include opioid consumption (MME), the Quality of Recovery score (QoR-15K), the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP), and in-hospital costs.

This is a phase IV, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted at four Yonsei University-affiliated hospitals in the Republic of Korea (Severance, Gangnam Severance, Wonju Severance, and Yongin Severance Hospitals). A total of 160 patients with gastric cancer scheduled for minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic) radical gastrectomy are randomized 1:1 to the experimental arm (acetaminophen-ibuprofen fixed-dose combination, Maxigesic IV) or the active comparator arm (acetaminophen alone, Newaminophen Premix). Randomization uses a stratified block design with the participating institution as the stratification factor, and allocation is concealed through a web-based system using a sequence generated by an independent statistician. To maintain double blinding, study drugs are prepared by an unblinded research pharmacist in a separate area and dispensed in containers masked with opaque labels, so that participants, care providers, and outcome assessors remain unaware of the allocation. In both arms, the assigned study drug is administered as a 15-minute intravenous infusion every 6 hours, beginning 30 minutes before the end of surgery and continuing through 48 hours after surgery (9 doses in total), with the total daily acetaminophen dose not exceeding 4 g. For breakthrough pain, a standardized stepwise rescue protocol (tramadol followed by pethidine) is applied without altering the scheduled study-drug regimen, and fever requiring an antipyretic is managed with ibuprofen. The two arms are identical except for the addition of ibuprofen in the experimental arm. Pain intensity is assessed using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale at rest and on movement at predefined time points over the first 72 hours after surgery. Additional assessments include opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents), the Korean Quality of Recovery score (QoR-15K), in-hospital costs, and chronic postsurgical pain at 3 months measured with the Brief Pain Inventory-Korean (BPI-K). Safety is evaluated by postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification), adverse drug reactions, and liver enzyme elevation. As exploratory analyses, an economic evaluation and a pharmacogenomic analysis are performed. No biospecimen is collected in this study. The pharmacogenomic analysis is conducted only in the subset of participants who are also enrolled in the National Bio Big Data Project, a separate national genomic study; for these participants, whole-genome sequencing data generated by that project are used-under that project's own consent and governance framework-to explore whether genetic polymorphisms are associated with differences in analgesic efficacy. The primary efficacy analysis is performed in the full analysis set, with the per-protocol set used for sensitivity analysis. The treatment effect on the primary outcome is evaluated as the between-group difference in the time-weighted average of NRS over 0-48 hours, estimated using a mixed model for repeated measures, with a covariate-adjusted linear mixed model as a supportive analysis. A Data Safety Monitoring Board reviews safety and data validity, and an interim analysis for safety and futility is conducted when 50% of the target participants have completed 72-hour follow-up. A two-sided significance level of 0.05 is applied.