Standard Versus Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath in Pediatric Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Renal Stones < 2 cm

Overview

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus a standard ureteral access sheath during flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) in pediatric patients with renal stones less than 2 cm. The study will evaluate stone-free rates. operative time. intraoperative parameters. operative and postoperative complication and the need for any auxiliary procedures. Sixty pediatric patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups and treated at the Urology Department, Tanta University.

Pediatric urolithiasis is an increasingly recognized condition associated with substantial morbidity and recurrence risk. Flexible ureterorenoscopy has become an established minimally invasive treatment option for renal stones smaller than 2 cm. The use of ureteral access sheaths facilitates repeated upper urinary tract access and may improve operative efficiency; however, concerns regarding ureteral trauma remain. Recently developed suction-assisted ureteral access sheaths have been introduced to improve visibility, facilitate fragment evacuation, and reduce intrarenal pressure. Although promising results have been reported in adults, evidence in pediatric patients remains limited. This prospective randomized controlled trial will compare a standard ureteral access sheath with a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) in pediatric patients undergoing flexible ureterorenoscopy for renal stones less than 2 cm.

Conditions