This study evaluates patient and provider attitudes about environmental exposure risk assessments into clinical care for female patients at average or high risk for breast cancer and/or diagnosed with early onset breast cancer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess patient interest and emotional responses toward EERA and return of results. II. To assess provider attitudes toward EERA integration into clinical workflows. OUTLINE: This is an observational study. Participants are assigned to 1 of 3 aims. AIM I: Average and high risk breast cancer participants and early onset breast cancer patients complete a survey over 15-25 minutes and may attend an interview over 30-45 minutes. Participants' and patients' medical records are reviewed. AIM II: COH providers complete a survey over 15-25 minutes and may attend an interview over 30-45 minutes. AIM III: Average and high risk breast cancer participants complete a baseline survey over 15-25 minutes and wear Fresh Air Clip wristbands for 1 week. Participants then complete a follow up survey over 15-25 minutes and may attend an interview over 30-45 minutes. Participants' medical records are reviewed.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
423
Non-interventional study
City of Hope Medical Center
Duarte, California, United States
RECRUITINGPatient survey responses on perceived utility
Will compare emotional responses, environmental health literacy, compensatory health behaviors, and cancer fatalism across the three participant groups (average risk, high risk, and early onset) using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Emotional response scores will be constructed by summing items within the positive and negative subscales separately, while the environmental health literacy, compensatory health behaviors and cancer fatalism will be calculated as summed total scores. ANCOVA will be used to estimate adjusted mean differences across groups and to evaluate whether post intervention responses differ after accounting for demographic factors. Interview sessions will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim.
Time frame: Up to one year
Patient survey responses on willingness to engage
Will compare emotional responses, environmental health literacy, compensatory health behaviors, and cancer fatalism across the three participant groups (average risk, high risk, and early onset) using ANCOVA. Emotional response scores will be constructed by summing items within the positive and negative subscales separately, while the environmental health literacy, compensatory health behaviors and cancer fatalism will be calculated as summed total scores. ANCOVA will be used to estimate adjusted mean differences across groups and to evaluate whether post intervention responses differ after accounting for demographic factors. Interview sessions will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim.
Time frame: Up to one year
Patient survey responses on preferences for receiving EERA results
Will compare emotional responses, environmental health literacy, compensatory health behaviors, and cancer fatalism across the three participant groups (average risk, high risk, and early onset) using ANCOVA. Emotional response scores will be constructed by summing items within the positive and negative subscales separately, while the environmental health literacy, compensatory health behaviors and cancer fatalism will be calculated as summed total scores. ANCOVA will be used to estimate adjusted mean differences across groups and to evaluate whether post intervention responses differ after accounting for demographic factors. Interview sessions will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Up to one year
Provider survey responses on perceived utility
Descriptive analysis will be used to examine all quantitative variables.
Time frame: Up to one year
Provider survey responses on feasibility
Descriptive analysis will be used to examine all quantitative variables.
Time frame: Up to one year
Provider survey responses on preferences for EERA disclosures into workflows
Descriptive analysis will be used to examine all quantitative variables.
Time frame: Up to one year
Proportion of participants who wear the work wristband for a total of 1 week
Feasibility will be defined as the proportion of participants who wear the work wristband for a total of 1 week. The feasibility rate will be summarized descriptively using point estimates and 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Up to one year
Chemical exposure measured by Fresh Air Clip wristband
Acceptability will be measured in the follow-up survey using the question: "Overall, how acceptable did you find wearing the 'Fresh Air clip' wristband to measure chemical exposures in your daily life?" Participants who respond "No opinion," "Acceptable," or "Completely acceptable" will be categorized as finding the wristband acceptable. The acceptability rate will be summarized descriptively using point estimates and 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Up to one year