The main objective of the study is to provide new knowledge about the implementation of DBT-informed environmental therapy in short-term substance use disorder (SUD) inpatient treatment. The study will examine which organizational and clinical conditions promote or inhibit implementation in clinical practice by elucidating how the implementation is experienced by staff (including experiences with structure, skill focus and environmental therapeutic principles) related to DBT-informed environmental therapy, DBT-SUD skill groups and patients' perceived satisfaction and utility. A secondary and exploratory aim is to examine preliminary trends in clinical measures in patients over time, including changes in symptom burden and reported use of DBT skills throughout the course of treatment. The study further seeks, at a descriptive and hypothesis-generating level, to explore patterns in patient-reported conditions related to substance abuse, emotion regulation, and other clinical burden. The sample will consist of up to 70 adult patients and 12 staff. One half of the patients will receive ordinary short-term inpatient treatment, while the other half will receive DBT informs milieu therapy after the approach has been established in clinical practice without being implemented. All patients will complete questionnaires upon admission (baseline), week 6 and upon discharge (week 12).
This pilot implementation study evaluates the introduction of DBT-informed milieu therapy in a short-term inpatient substance use disorder (SUD) treatment unit. The study aims to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of implementing DBT-informed milieu therapy in routine clinical practice, as well as to explore preliminary trends in patient-reported clinical outcomes. The study uses a sequential A-B design. During Phase A, patients receive treatment as usual (TAU), consisting of standard short-term inpatient SUD treatment. During Phase B, DBT-informed milieu therapy is implemented as part of routine care following staff training and integration of DBT-informed principles and skills into daily clinical practice. Implementation outcomes are assessed at the unit level and include measures of fidelity, feasibility, acceptability, and adherence to planned implementation activities. Data sources include implementation records, staff questionnaires, and qualitative interviews with staff members involved in the implementation process. Patient-reported clinical outcomes are collected to explore changes during treatment and to generate hypotheses for future studies. Outcomes include emotion regulation, borderline symptom severity, DBT-related coping skills, alcohol use, and drug use. Data are collected at admission (baseline), week 6, and discharge when applicable. The study is conducted in a multidisciplinary specialized substance use disorder treatment service. Adult patients admitted to the participating short-term inpatient unit are recruited consecutively during the study period. The study is intended to provide knowledge about factors that facilitate or hinder implementation of DBT-informed milieu therapy and to inform future larger-scale evaluations.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
82
Implementation of DBT-informed milieu therapy, including staff training and integration of DBT-informed principles and skills into daily inpatient treatment.
Standard short-term inpatient SUD treatment including milieu therapy, individual counseling, group-based interventions and pharmacological treatment according to routine clinical practice.
Helse Møre og Romsdal HF
Ålesund, More and Romsdal, Norway
Fidelity to DBT-informed milieu therapy implementation
Degree of implementation of DBT-informed milieu therapy at the unit level, assessed through documentation of staff training, implementation activities and adherence to planned DBT-informed practices, and feedback from staff and patients.Fidelity assessed through implementation records, staff questionnaires and qualitative staff interviews.
Time frame: During the 12 week implementation period.
Emotion regulation (DERS 16 total score)
Total score on the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-16. Higher scores indicate greater difficulties in emotion regulation.
Time frame: Baseline, 6. weeks and discharge (12 weeks)
DBT coping skills (DBT-WCCL)
Use of coping skills assessed with the DBT Ways of Coping Checklist (DBT-WCCL). The instrument measures the use of DBT-consistent coping strategies during treatment.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and Discharge (12 weeks)
Borderline symptom List (BSL-23)
Total score on the Borderline Symptom List-23 (BSL-23). Higher scores indicate greater severity of borderline-related symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and Discharge (12 weeks)
Alcohol use (AUDIT total score)
Alcohol use and alcohol-related problems assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Higher scores indicate greater alcohol-related risk and problems
Time frame: Baseline and Discharge (12 weeks)
Drug use (DUDIT total score)
Drug use and drug-related problems assessed using the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT). Higher scores indicate greater drug-related risk and problems.
Time frame: Baseline and Discharge (12 weeks)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.