This observational cross-sectional study aims to evaluate the effects of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on pelvic floor function and psychosocial well-being. The study will assess the prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction, as well as their impact on quality of life, sexual health, self-esteem, and interpersonal relationships. Adult men who underwent radical prostatectomy at least one year before enrollment will complete a series of validated questionnaires and provide demographic and clinical information through online surveys or telephone interviews. The study will also explore whether participants received pelvic floor physiotherapy before or after surgery and whether rehabilitation is associated with better functional and psychosocial outcomes. The findings may contribute to a better understanding of the long-term consequences of radical prostatectomy and help identify opportunities to improve patient care.
Radical prostatectomy is one of the most common curative treatments for localized prostate cancer. Although surgical techniques have improved over recent decades, urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction remain among the most frequent long-term complications after surgery. These conditions may substantially affect patients' quality of life, sexual health, self-esteem, interpersonal relationships, and psychosocial well-being. Despite the availability of conservative pelvic floor rehabilitation strategies, access to and use of pelvic floor physiotherapy before and after surgery remain variable. This observational cross-sectional study aims to evaluate the long-term effects of radical prostatectomy on pelvic floor function and psychosocial outcomes in men who underwent surgery at least one year before study participation. Data will be collected through validated patient-reported outcome measures and a structured questionnaire including sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment-related information. Participants will be recruited through social media, institutional dissemination, patient networks, and snowball sampling. After providing electronic informed consent, participants will complete the study questionnaires either online or, when digital literacy is limited, through a structured telephone interview conducted by a trained researcher. No interviews will be audio-recorded, and all data will be pseudonymized before analysis. The primary objectives are to evaluate urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy and to describe their psychosocial consequences. Secondary objectives include determining the proportion of patients who received information about pelvic floor physiotherapy, identifying the proportion who underwent pelvic floor rehabilitation before and/or after surgery, and exploring whether rehabilitation is associated with differences in functional and psychosocial outcomes. The study also aims to improve awareness of pelvic floor rehabilitation as part of the multidisciplinary management of prostate cancer survivors.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
67
No intervention
Gascó Oliag, 5
Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Erectile dysfunction
Erectile function assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5). Higher scores indicate better erectile function.
Time frame: Baseline (single assessment)
Urinary incontinence severity
Urinary incontinence severity assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity and impact on quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline (single assessment)
Prostate cancer-specific urinary symptoms and quality of life
Urinary symptoms and prostate cancer-specific quality of life assessed using the EORTC QLQ-PR25 questionnaire. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-PR25). Scores for each scale are transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden for symptom scales and better functioning for functional scales.
Time frame: Baseline (single assessment)
Sexual health
Sexual health assessed using the EORTC Sexual Health Questionnaire (EORTC SH22). Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate better sexual functioning for functional scales and worse symptoms or problems for symptom scales.
Time frame: Baseline (single assessment)
Self-esteem and relationship outcomes
Self-esteem and relationship functioning assessed using the Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire (SEAR).Total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better self-esteem and relationship functioning.
Time frame: Baseline (single assessment)
Health-related quality of life
Health-related quality of life assessed using the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline (single assessment)
Pelvic floor physiotherapy
Self-reported information regarding receipt of information about pelvic floor physiotherapy and participation in pelvic floor rehabilitation before and/or after radical prostatectomy.
Time frame: Baseline (single assessment)
Comfort discussing urinary incontinence
Participant-rated comfort discussing urinary incontinence using a 10-point Likert scale (1 = very uncomfortable to 10 = very comfortable). Higher scores indicate greater comfort.
Time frame: Baseline (single assessment)
Comfort discussing sexual health
Participant-rated comfort discussing sexual health using a 10-point Likert scale (1 = very uncomfortable to 10 = very comfortable). Higher scores indicate greater comfort.
Time frame: Baseline (single assessment)
Perceived influence of social taboos
Perceived influence of social taboos on discussing urinary incontinence and sexual health assessed using a 10-point Likert scale (1 = no influence to 10 = very strong influence). Higher scores indicate greater perceived influence of social taboos.
Time frame: Baseline (single assessment)
Honesty of questionnaire responses
Self-reported honesty when answering questionnaires assessed using a 10-point Likert scale (1 = not honest at all to 10 = completely honest). Higher scores indicate greater perceived honesty.
Time frame: Baseline (single assessment)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.