The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the Sola2 AMF Knee System, when added to surgery and antibiotic treatment, can safely improve outcomes, knee function, and quality of life in adults with knee implant infection. The main questions this study aims to answer are: 1. Whether adding the Sola2 AMF Knee System improves knee function and quality of life at 6 months. 2. Whether adding the Sola2 AMF Knee System to surgery and antibiotic treatment affects the need for additional infection-related surgery. 3. Whether the Sola2 AMF Knee System can be used safely, based on device-related adverse events through 12 months. This study has two stages. In Stage 1, participants will be enrolled into sequential sentinel groups at increasing AMF temperature levels. All sentinel participants will receive active Sola2 AMF treatment. A safety review will occur after each sentinel group before proceeding to the next group. In Stage 2, researchers will compare participants who receive active Sola2 AMF treatment to participants who receive sham AMF treatment. All participants will receive surgery called debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), and antibiotic treatment for knee implant infection. Participants will: * Have DAIR surgery for knee implant infection; * Receive pathogen-appropriate antibiotic treatment from the study doctor; * If enrolled in Stage 1, receive active Sola2 AMF treatment at the designated sentinel temperature level; * If enrolled in Stage 2, receive either active Sola2 AMF treatment or sham AMF treatment, depending on randomization assignment; and * Complete follow-up visits and assessments for safety, infection status, pain, knee function, x-rays, laboratory tests, and other study-related outcomes.
The AMPLIFY trial is a prospective, multicenter, staged clinical investigation of the investigational Sola2 AMF Knee System in adults with confirmed knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) who will undergo debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) surgery and pathogen-appropriate antibiotic therapy. The study is conducted under a single Investigational Device Exemption and includes two stages. Stage 1 is an open-label sentinel stage using sequential AMF temperature escalation. Sentinel participants receive active Sola2 AMF treatment, with safety review after each sentinel group before progression to the next planned temperature level or to the randomized stage. Stage 2 is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled stage in which participants are assigned to active Sola2 AMF treatment or sham AMF treatment. The Sola2 AMF Knee System is an external, non-contacting investigational device that generates alternating magnetic fields intended to produce controlled heating at metallic knee implant surfaces. The AMF or sham treatment is administered in the operating room in conjunction with the planned DAIR procedure. All participants receive DAIR and pathogen-appropriate antibiotic therapy as part of their clinical care. Safety oversight includes medical monitoring, independent Data Safety Monitoring Board review, and independent Clinical Events Committee adjudication as specified in the protocol.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
165
Active alternating magnetic field treatment is delivered using the investigational Sola2 AMF Knee System. The system is an external, non-contacting device that generates alternating magnetic fields intended to produce controlled heating at metallic knee implant surfaces. Treatment is administered in the operating room in conjunction with DAIR.
Sham alternating magnetic field treatment is delivered during the randomized stage using the Sola2 AMF Knee System workflow. The sham treatment uses the same treatment timing and device-use steps as active treatment, without delivery of active alternating magnetic field energy
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention is the planned surgical treatment for participants with knee prosthetic joint infection participants. In this study, all participants undergo DAIR, including polyethylene spacer exchange, and receive pathogen-appropriate antibiotic therapy as part of standard clinical care.
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement
Change from baseline to 6 months in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement. The score is reported using the validated 0 to 100 interval scoring method, with higher scores indicating better knee health.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Incidence of Infection-Related Surgical Reintervention
Number and percentage of participants with a qualifying infection-related surgical reintervention event, as adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee. Qualifying events include surgical reintervention due to relapse or surgical reintervention for ongoing infection, as defined in the protocol. Only the first adjudicated qualifying surgical reintervention event per participant contributes to the primary endpoint analysis.
Time frame: From the index DAIR procedure through the primary efficacy analysis, triggered when 24 adjudicated events have occurred and at least 100 participants have completed 12-month follow-up
Incidence of AMF Study Device-Related Adverse Events
Number and percentage of participants with one or more adverse events determined to be related to the AMF study device. Potential primary safety endpoint events are independently adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee according to the CEC charter.
Time frame: Through 12 months post-procedure
Incidence, Severity, and Relatedness of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Between-arm comparison of the incidence, severity, and relatedness of adverse events and serious adverse events.
Time frame: Through 12 months post-procedure
Time to Resolution and Duration of PJI-Related Signs and Symptoms
Between-arm comparison of the time to resolution and duration of PJI-related signs and symptoms, such as pain, drainage, erythema, and edema.
Time frame: Through 12 months post-procedure
Proportion of Participants With Resolution or Marked Improvement of Infection-Related Symptoms
Between-arm comparison of the proportion of participants with resolution or marked improvement of infection-related symptoms at scheduled follow-up visits.
Time frame: Through 12 months post-procedure
Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale Pain Score
Between-arm comparison of change from baseline in participant-reported pain using the Numeric Rating Scale at scheduled follow-up visits. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain.
Time frame: Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at Follow-Up Visits Over Time
Between-arm comparison of change from baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at scheduled follow-up visits other than the 6-month primary endpoint. Scores are reported using the validated 0 to 100 interval scoring method, with higher scores indicating better knee health.
Time frame: Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Patient-Reported Health Status
Between-arm comparison of change from baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System patient-reported health status at scheduled follow-up visits.
Time frame: Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
Change From Baseline and Time to Normalization of C-Reactive Protein
Between-arm comparison of change from baseline and time to normalization of C-reactive protein among participants with elevated C-reactive protein at enrollment. Normalization is defined according to the reference range of the performing laboratory.
Time frame: Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
Change From Baseline and Time to Normalization of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Between-arm comparison of change from baseline and time to normalization of erythrocyte sedimentation rate among participants with elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate at enrollment. Normalization is defined according to the reference range of the performing laboratory.
Time frame: Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
Proportion of Participants Achieving Biomarker Normalization
Proportion of Participants Achieving Biomarker Normalization
Time frame: Through 12 months post-procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.