This study investigates a new, simplified approach to measuring blood pressure within the liver (portal hypertension) using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Portal Pressure Gradient Measurement (EUS-PPG). While this minimally invasive method traditionally relies on a hepatic vein as the baseline reference point, advanced liver scarring can make these veins twisted and highly difficult to access. To address this challenge, our study evaluates the Inferior Vena Cava (IVC)-the body's largest main vein-as an alternative reference site. Currently, it remains scientifically unproven whether the inferior vena cava or the hepatic vein provides the more reliable and accurate pressure reading for calculation, as anatomical distortion from cirrhosis can affect both areas differently. By measuring and comparing both venous compartments during a single, clinically scheduled endoscopy session, this study aims to determine if the pressures are truly interchangeable. Ultimately, this research will clarify which vessel serves as the optimal reference point, helping to establish a safer, more reliable diagnostic standard for patients with complex vascular anatomy.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
40
During a clinically indicated endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), patients undergo portal pressure gradient (PPG) measurement using a linear-array echoendoscope and a dedicated needle system (22G or 25G). The intervention utilizes a transgastric approach to sequentially measure pressures in three vessels: a left intrahepatic portal vein branch, a hepatic vein, and the inferior vena cava (IVC). The IVC is safely punctured through a window covered by liver tissue. Pressures are measured in triplicate per vessel. This protocol uniquely calculates two distinct gradients within the same procedural session: HVP-PPG: Calculated as the mean portal vein pressure minus the mean hepatic vein pressure (HVP). IVCP-PPG: Calculated as the mean portal vein pressure minus the mean inferior vena cava pressure (IVCP).
University Hospital Muenster
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Agreement between mean hepatic vein pressure and mean inferior vena cava pressure measured during the same EUS-PPG session
Based on prior reproducibility data for EUS-guided portal pressure measurements, a predefined absolute difference of \>1 mmHg between HVP and IVCP was considered clinically relevant. Differences ≤1 mmHg after rounding to the nearest whole mmHg were considered hemodynamically equivalent, reflecting clinical pressure reporting practice.
Time frame: Intraprocedural
Correlation between HVP and IVCP, Bland-Altman analysis of agreement and systematic bias
Time frame: Intraprocedural measurement
Agreement between PPG-HV and PPG-IVC
Time frame: Intraprocedural measurement
Reclassification across clinically significant portal hypertension thresholds (≥10 mmHg)
Time frame: Intraprocedural measurement
Intraprocedural variability of triplicate measurements
Time frame: Intraprocedural measurement
Procedural adverse events
Time frame: Up to 72 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.