Colorectal cancer can be effectively prevented by removal of pre-malignant polyps during colonoscopy. Large (\>=20mm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) require careful assessment before treatment. If submucosal invasive cancer (SMI) is present, it determines whether endoscopic treatment can be curative or whether surgery is needed. Current classification systems to detect SMI are complex, require extensive training, and are underused in non-tertiary hospitals. A simple web-based clinical decision support tool was created using well-established parameters (presence of a demarcated area, polyp size, Paris classification, location, and granularity) to identify SMI within LNPCPs. Crucially, the tool uses only standard endoscopic imaging available in most endoscopy units. This prospective multi-centre study evaluates the accuracy of the tool during live endoscopic assessment. Endoscopists of varying experience will assess 10 large colorectal polyps using the tool, then undergo a 45-minute structured educational intervention. They will then assess a further 10 polyps using the tool. A third set of 10 assessments at 3 months evaluates durability of learning. Accuracy is compared to expert opinion.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of death in the Western world. Large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs, \>=20mm) represent 2-3% of colorectal polyps and require special attention. The presence of submucosal invasive cancer (SMI) determines whether endoscopic treatment is curative or whether referral for surgery is necessary. Current endoscopic classification systems (JNET, Kudo, NICE) are complex, require specialized equipment, and extensive training, making them underused in non-tertiary practice. A novel, freely accessible web-based clinical decision support tool (available at gieqs.com/SMI) was developed based on established risk factors for SMI: the presence and characteristics of a demarcated area within the polyp, polyp size (\>=40mm), Paris classification, colonic location, and granularity. The tool uses only standard white-light and virtual chromoendoscopy available in the majority of Western endoscopy units. This is a prospective, multi-centre study conducted across 8 centres in Belgium, the United Kingdom, Israel, and Italy. The study evaluates whether endoscopists of varying experience can accurately detect SMI within LNPCPs during live colonoscopy using this tool. The study follows a pre-post design: * Phase 1 (Pre-training): Each endoscopist assesses 10 eligible LNPCPs using a standardized assessment and creates a 1-minute standardized video of each lesion. * Educational Intervention: All endoscopists complete a 45-minute structured interactive educational session. * Phase 2 (Post-training): Each endoscopist assesses a further 10 LNPCPs using the clinical decision support tool. * Phase 3 (Durability): At 3 months, a further 10 assessments are performed to evaluate durability of the training effect. Expert opinion applied to standardized videos serves as the reference standard. Histopathology results are recorded for all resected specimens. An interim analysis is planned when half the required participants are enrolled.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
886
UZ Gent
Ghent, Belgium
RECRUITINGAccuracy of Endoscopic Assessment of the Risk of Submucosal Invasive Cancer Within LNPCPs Using the Clinical Decision Support Tool Compared to Expert Opinion During Live Endoscopy
The accuracy of each endoscopist's assessment of SMI risk using the tool, compared to expert opinion applied to a standardised video of the same procedure. Measured as sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy across pre-training, post-training, and 3-month durability phases.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 48 months
Percentage of LNPCP Assessments in Which a Demarcated Area Is Correctly Detected Using the Clinical Decision Support Tool, Compared to Expert Opinion
Endoscopists assess presence/absence of a demarcated area on a standardised endoscopic video using the SMI clinical decision support tool. Expert opinion is the reference standard (considered 100% accurate). Accuracy = proportion of assessments concordant with the expert.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 48 months
Inter-observer Agreement Among Endoscopists in Detection of a Demarcated Area Within LNPCPs, Measured by Fleiss' Kappa
Agreement among the multiple participating endoscopists rating the same standardised endoscopic videos, quantified by Fleiss' kappa (appropriate for 3+ raters; corrects for chance agreement).
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 48 months
Percentage of Demarcated Areas in Which the JNET Classification Is Correctly Determined, Compared to Expert Opinion
Endoscopists assign the JNET (Japan NBI Expert Team) classification to the demarcated area within each LNPCP. Expert opinion is the reference standard (considered 100% accurate). Accuracy = proportion of assessments in which the endoscopist's JNET category matches the expert reference.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 48 months
Percentage of Lesions in Which Each Morphological Component (Size, Location, Granularity, Paris Classification) Is Correctly Determined, Compared to Expert Opinion
Each morphological component is assessed by the endoscopist and compared to the expert reference standard (considered 100% accurate). Accuracy = proportion of assessments concordant with the expert, reported separately for size, location, granularity, and Paris classification.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 48 months
Correct Treatment Decision Based Upon the Tool Score (Rate of Unnecessary Surgery for Benign Disease or Unnecessary Endoscopic Treatment Requiring Subsequent Surgery)
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 48 months
Endoscopist-Reported Utility of the Clinical Decision Support Tool, Measured by a 5-point Likert-Scale Questionnaire
Participating endoscopists complete a structured questionnaire rating the usability and perceived clinical utility of the tool on a 1-5 Likert scale (1 = not useful, 5 = very useful).
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 48 months
Difference in Scoring Accuracy Before and After the 45-minute Structured Educational Intervention
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 48 months
Percentage Accuracy of SMI Detection Using the Clinical Decision Support Tool at 3 Months Post-Intervention
Endoscopists perform a further 10 LNPCP assessments 3 months after the educational intervention, using the SMI clinical decision support tool. Accuracy = proportion of assessments concordant with the expert reference standard (considered 100% accurate). Compared to immediately post-intervention accuracy to assess durability of the learning effect.
Time frame: 3 months after educational intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.