Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With High-Genetic-Risk Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: The HGEN-CARE-AC Trial

N/ANot Yet RecruitingNCT07708311

Juan Jiménez Jáimez70 enrolled

Overview

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate a structured and personalized cardiac rehabilitation program for patients diagnosed with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) who carry high-risk genetic mutations. Historically, physical exercise has been strictly restricted in these patients due to the potential risk of triggering life-threatening arrhythmias and accelerating structural heart disease. However, complete inactivity leads to severe physical deconditioning and reduced quality of life. This study aims to address this clinical dilemma by investigating a safe way to prescribe exercise. The primary research question is: Is a supervised, moderate-intensity exercise program safe, and does it avoid increasing the risk of cardiac arrhythmias or worsening right ventricular function compared to standard physical restriction? Secondary objectives include the evaluation of the impact of this tailored physical intervention on the participants' functional capacity, specifically measuring changes in physical fitness and peak oxygen consumption through cardiovascular testing. Additionally, the trial assesses the psychological benefits of the program, analyzing its effects on health-related quality of life, anxiety, and depression levels. The experimental group undergoing cardiac rehabilitation will be compared to a control group receiving conventional physical restriction guidelines to determine if the program is both safe and comprehensive.

Study Design: This is an exploratory, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial designed to assess the safety and feasibility of a structured cardiac rehabilitation program for patients with high-genetic-risk arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM). Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the experimental intervention group or a control group receiving standard-of-care physical restriction guidelines. Interventions: * Experimental Group: Participants will undergo a 12-week supervised cardiac rehabilitation program. This intervention involves individualized, moderate-intensity exercise sessions. The intensity of the exercise prescription will be titrated based on baseline cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and individual cardiovascular risk profiles, aiming to improve functional capacity while minimizing the risk of pro-arrhythmic events. * Control Group: Participants will follow conventional standard-of-care recommendations, which emphasize physical activity restriction as per current clinical practice guidelines for high-risk ACM. Data Acquisition and Monitoring: Safety and structural remodeling will be monitored throughout the study period. Safety assessments include continuous surveillance for adverse events (e.g., symptomatic arrhythmias, syncope, or hospitalizations). Structural and functional cardiac changes will be quantified through standardized advanced cardiac imaging techniques (echocardiography) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and follow-up time points. Psychometric status will be evaluated using validated questionnaires to capture changes in health-related quality of life, anxiety, and depression. Statistical Analysis Plan: Continuous variables will be reported as mean ± standard deviation (or median and interquartile range for non-normal distributions), while categorical variables will be presented as frequencies and percentages. Longitudinal changes from baseline to follow-up will be evaluated using mixed-effects models for repeated measures, accounting for inter-individual variability. An exploratory subgroup analysis will be conducted to assess the consistency of the intervention's effects across predefined patient strata. Differences in safety and efficacy outcomes (such as changes in VO2 peak and left ventricular ejection fraction) will be evaluated, stratified by: * Biological Sex: Categorized as male or female. * Causal Genotype: Categorized by the identified pathogenic variant (LMNA, DSP, FLNC, TMEM43, PLN, or DES). Statistical comparisons between subgroups will be performed using independent t-tests or ANOVA for normally distributed continuous data, and Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests for non-normally distributed data. Categorical variables will be assessed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. This exploratory analysis is intended to identify potential heterogeneous treatment effects; all tests will be two-tailed, with a p-value \< 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Composite safety endpoint of clinical and arrhythmic events.

Safety of the 12-week supervised moderate-intensity exercise program will be evaluated as a composite endpoint defined by the absence of a clinically relevant increase in ventricular arrhythmias or major adverse cardiovascular events. Arrhythmic safety includes ventricular arrhythmia burden (sustained and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia) detected via prolonged ambulatory Holter monitoring and ICD (Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator) interrogation logs. Clinical safety events track the incidence of major complications during the study period, including sudden cardiac death, appropriate or inappropriate ICD therapies (shocks or antitachycardia pacing), and arrhythmic syncope, comparing the intervention cohort against the standard physical restriction control group.

Time frame: From baseline up to 6 months.

Secondary Outcomes

Change from baseline in peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak)

Change in peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak). Breath-by-breath gas exchange measurements (oxygen uptake in mL/min and carbon dioxide production in mL/min) and total body weight in kilograms (Kg) will be combined to report VO2 peak in mL/kg/min. This value represents the highest 30-second average of oxygen consumption attained during the maximal effort stage of a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET).

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Change from baseline in metabolic equivalents (METs)

Preliminary clinical efficacy on functional capacity will be evaluated using objective cardiopulmonary metrics. Change in metabolic equivalents (METs). Peak oxygen uptake (mL/kg/min) and the resting metabolic constant (3.5 mL/kg/min) will be combined to report the peak METs achieved during maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). This value is calculated as the ratio of peak oxygen consumption to the resting metabolic rate.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Change from baseline in 6-minute walk distance

Change in total distance walked during the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Walking speed (m/s) and the duration of the test (6 minutes) will be combined to report the total distance covered in meters. The distance is measured from start to finish based on the participant's total displacement during the 6-minute period.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks.

Change from baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score

The psychological impact of the rehabilitation program will be assessed using validated psychometric scales. Change in anxiety and depression levels. Individual item scores (responses to 14 questions) will be combined to report the total HADS score. This scale aggregates responses to assess anxiety and depression symptoms; higher scores indicate greater symptom severity (a worse outcome). Unit of Measure: Scale (on a scale of 0 to 42)