This clinical trial compares two different weight-loss programs, daily continuous calorie energy reduction (CER) versus (vs.) 5:2 intermittent fasting (IF), in preventing progression of kidney (renal) cancer among patients with one or more small renal masses (SRM) undergoing active surveillance (AS). Kidney cancer patients tend to have changes in metabolism that may increase body weight, but weight-loss strategies that work for best for these patients are unknown. The CER program requires a set daily limit for calories. The IF program requires fasting for 2 days a week and normal eating for the remaining 5 days. Both will include self-monitoring with interventionist feedback. This trial may help researchers determine whether the IF program works better than the CER program in improving weight loss, physical health, and/or reducing the risk of kidney cancer progression among patients with small renal masses undergoing AS
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Adapt two evidence-based behavioral weight loss intervention programs (IF and CER) with a goal to cause weight loss in SRM patients on AS. II. Determine the feasibility of the two intervention programs (IF and CER). SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: I. Measure, compare and explore preliminary effect sizes of IF vs. CER on body weight, diet, body composition, tumor growth, and rates of clinical progression and invasive treatment conversion
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
The IF intervention will instruct participants how to fast safely, how to conduct a 5:2 fast, and encourage moderate physical activity. Self-monitoring with interventionist feedback will also be included
Lessons about lowering caloric intake each day and moderate physical activity with self-monitoring and interventionist feedback
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Buffalo, New York, United States
RECRUITINGParticipation Rate
This will assess the rate of eligible persons who enroll after invitation and the mean proportion of intervention components completed by arm and participant
Time frame: At 6 months
Change in tumor size
Will be assessed based on radiologic imaging. Within-group differences between baseline and 6 months will be examined using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for continuous variables, and McNemar's test for categorical variables.
Time frame: At baseline and at 6 months
Rate of clinical progression
defined based on radiologic tumor size (\> 4 cm), stage (\> cT1a) and growth rate (\> 5 mm/year for \< 3 cm size; \> 3 mm/year for tumor size \> 3 cm), in addition to biopsy histology (high grade or unclassified renal cell carcinoma histologic subtype) and patient symptomology (bleeding or paraneoplastic symptoms/signs attributable to the tumor), as per the International Consultation for Urologic Disease guidelines
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Change in Dietary Intake
Participants will complete 3 recalls over the phone regarding dietary intake over a prior 24-hour period.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in Body composition
Will be measured using a body composition monitor, which uses bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure whole body and segmental body composition, including trunk fat..
Time frame: Baseline and at 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.