How to predict which patients with initially unresectable liver cancer are more likely to respond to conversion therapy remains an important unresolved problem in guiding treatment strategy and surgical timing. Substantial variation exists among patients in their tumor response to the same conversion therapy regimen, and current pretreatment imaging assessment does not adequately capture this inter-individual variability. We hypothesize that baseline tumor viscoelastic parameters measured by three-dimensional magnetic resonance elastography (3D-MRE) differ substantially across patients, and that this inter-individual heterogeneity may be associated with differential response to conversion therapy. This study aims to prospectively evaluate the association between baseline 3D-MRE-derived tumor viscoelastic parameters and pathological response as well as surgical conversion outcomes across patients with liver cancer receiving conversion therapy.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
100
Patients with initially unresectable liver cancer who are planned to receive conversion therapy will undergo a baseline three-dimensional magnetic resonance elastography (3D-MRE) examination prior to treatment initiation, in addition to standard-of-care evaluation. 3D-MRE will be used to quantify tumor viscoelastic parameters (including stiffness, storage modulus, loss modulus, and damping ratio) at baseline. These baseline imaging parameters will be compared across patients and analyzed for their association with subsequent pathological response and surgical conversion outcomes following conversion therapy. The examination does not alter the standard treatment regimen selected by the treating physician.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) after conversion therapy
Response evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 or mRECIST criteria based on imaging assessment after conversion therapy, analyzed in relation to baseline 3D-MRE parameters
Time frame: At the time of post-conversion therapy imaging evaluation (approximately 8-12 weeks after treatment initiation)
Association between baseline 3D-MRE parameters and pathological response
Correlation between baseline tumor stiffness (measured in kilopascals by three-dimensional magnetic resonance elastography) and pathological response status (major pathological response \[≤10% residual viable tumor\] vs. non-major pathological response, assessed by histopathological examination of the surgical specimen) in patients who undergo surgical resection following conversion therapy.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment); surgical pathology if resection is performed
Surgical Conversion Rate
Proportion of patients who successfully undergo surgical resection after conversion therapy
Time frame: Up to 6 months after conversion therapy initiation
Predictive accuracy (AUC) of baseline 3D-MRE parameters for treatment response
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for baseline 3D-MRE-derived tumor stiffness in predicting objective response (per RECIST 1.1 or mRECIST) to conversion therapy.
Time frame: Baseline through 12 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.