The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a short-term (12-week) prehabilitation strategy combining mazdutide (a novel GLP-1/GCG receptor dual agonist) with lifestyle optimization, compared to lifestyle optimization alone, in potential living liver transplantation donors with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASLD). Overweight or obese individuals who intend to donate a portion of their liver but are temporarily disqualified due to hepatic steatosis will be recruited across multiple clinical centers. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the experimental group (mazdutide subcutaneous injection once weekly plus standardized lifestyle counseling) or the control group (placebo subcutaneous injection once weekly plus standardized lifestyle counseling). The primary objective is to determine whether the short-term addition of mazdutide can significantly increase the proportion of donors achieving histological resolution of hepatic steatosis without the worsening of fibrosis within 12 weeks. The study ultimately aims to provide high-quality evidence for a rapid, safe, and effective surgical prehabilitation protocol to expand the living donor pool and optimize perioperative outcomes for both donors and recipients.
Background and Rationale: Hepatic steatosis significantly elevates perioperative complications in major abdominal surgeries. In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), macrovesicular steatosis exceeding 30% renders potential donors ineligible due to severe ischemia-reperfusion injury risks in recipients and impaired remnant liver regeneration in donors. Traditional prehabilitation strategies relying solely on lifestyle changes or low-calorie diets often fail to achieve satisfactory histological reversal within the critical, time-sensitive pre-operative window. Mazdutide, a dual agonist of GLP-1 and glucagon (GCG) receptors, has demonstrated powerful synergistic effects in rapid weight reduction and rapid hepatic fat clearance by simultaneously suppressing appetite and activating hepatic lipolysis. This trial aims to validate whether short-term mazdutide intervention can serve as an aggressive prehabilitation tool to accelerate donor downstaging. Study Design and Procedures: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial conducted in major transplant centers. The study consists of two parts: Part 1 spans from screening to the liver procurement surgery (up to 24 weeks), and Part 2 covers post-operative follow-up up to 1 year. Potential donors will undergo a rigorous two-step screening process: 1. Non-invasive screening: Assessment of body mass index (BMI \>= 24 kg/m²) and controlled attenuation parameter via FibroScan (CAP \>= 268 dB/m). 2. Histological confirmation: A baseline liver biopsy (Liver Biopsy 1) demonstrating MASLD with a NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) \>= 3 and a steatosis subscore \>= 2, strictly excluding any degree of liver fibrosis. Eligible participants will be randomized (1:1) into: * Experimental Group (GG Group): Mazdutide subcutaneous injections once weekly, following a dose-escalation regimen: 2mg for Weeks 1-2, 4mg for Weeks 3-4, and a target dose of 6mg from Week 5 to Week 12. * Control Group (LL Group): Matching placebo injections once weekly. Both groups will receive identical, standardized counseling on an energy-restricted diet (deficit of 500-750 kcal/day, total intake \<= 1500 kcal/day) and structured physical exercise (\>= 150 minutes/week of moderate-to-high intensity sport). Compliance will be monitored via electronic diaries and smart wearable fitness trackers. Efficacy and Safety Endpoints: At Week 12 (or earlier if triggered by regular FibroScan text assessments indicating steatosis resolution), a second liver biopsy (Liver Biopsy 2) and abdominal magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) will be completed to evaluate the primary endpoint: resolution of hepatic steatosis without worsening of MASLD. For donors successfully meeting the transplantation criteria, a mandatory 1-week drug washout period will be enforced before surgery to mitigate potential anesthesia risks associated with delayed gastric emptying. On the day of surgery, an ultrasound assessment of gastric volume will be performed prior to anesthesia induction. Exploratory analysis in Part 2 will dynamically track the remnant liver regeneration rate in donors (via CT volumetry) and early graft function (AST/ALT peaks, TBil, and INR recovery profiles) as well as long-term quality of life (SF-36) in recipients up to 1 year post-transplantation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
60
Active drug intervention consisting of a novel GLP-1/GCG receptor dual agonist solution (Mazdutide) administered via subcutaneous injection once weekly using a single-use prefilled automatic injection pen. The dosing schedule follows a 12-week step-up titration regimen starting at 2 mg q1w for Weeks 1-2, increasing to 4 mg q1w for Weeks 3-4 if gastrointestinal tolerated, and reaching a target dose of 6 mg q1w from Week 5 to Week 12 if gastrointestinal tolerated. For participants with intolerable gastrointestinal adverse events, the titration cycle can be prolonged to 3 weeks, or they are permitted to maintain a lower tolerated dose based on multidisciplinary team consensus. To ensure surgical safety, this prehabilitation protocol enforces a mandatory 1-week drug washout period prior to hepatectomy, followed by a preoperative gastric ultrasound assessment by an anesthesiologist to rule out aspiration risks.
Inactive comparator intervention consisting of a matching placebo (normal saline) solution administered via subcutaneous injection once weekly. To strictly maintain the double-blind design, the placebo features an identical appearance, volume, and automatic prefilled injection pen delivery device. The administration schedule, dose escalation simulation steps, and the mandatory 1-week pre-operative drug washout period mirror the experimental mazdutide group exactly to maintain the blinding integrity prior to the hepatectomy.
Standardized lifestyle optimization provided to both groups, consisting of an calorie-restricted diet (CRD) and structured physical exercise. The CRD targets a daily calorie deficit of 500 to 750 kcal, with a total daily intake not exceeding 1500 kcal (1000-1200 kcal for females; 1200-1500 kcal for males). The structured exercise requires at least 5 days per week, totaling \>=150 minutes of moderate-to-high intensity aerobic training with a daily energy expenditure \>=150 kcal. Adherence is tracked objectively using a provided smart fitness tracker and daily electronic diaries without mandatory enforcement.
Anhui Provincial Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC)
Hefei, Anhui, China
Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Proportion of Participants Achieving Resolution of MASLD Without Worsening of Liver Fibrosis (ROM)
Percentage of participants who achieve histological resolution of MASLD. Resolution is defined based on the second liver biopsy as a NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) steatosis subscore \<= 1, a hepatocyte ballooning subscore = 0, and a lobular inflammation subscore \<= 1. Additionally, to meet the criteria for resolution, there must be no increase in the total NAS, hepatocyte ballooning, or lobular inflammation subscores, and no worsening of liver fibrosis compared to the baseline liver biopsy.
Time frame: From randomization (Week 0) to Week 12
Proportion of Participants Achieving Ultrasound-Assessed Improvement of Hepatic Steatosis (uIOS)
Percentage of participants who achieve improvement of hepatic steatosis evaluated by FibroScan®. Improvement is defined as the Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) dropping to \< 268 dB/m.
Time frame: From randomization (Week 0) up to Week 12
Proportion of Participants Achieving Imaging-Assessed Improvement of Hepatic Steatosis (iIOS)
Percentage of participants who achieve improvement of hepatic steatosis evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Improvement is defined as the MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) dropping to \< 15%.
Time frame: From randomization (Week 0) up to Week 12
Proportion of Participants Achieving Improvement of MASLD Without Worsening of Liver Fibrosis (IOM)
Percentage of participants achieving MASLD improvement evaluated by liver biopsy. It is defined as a decrease in the total NAS by \>= 2 or a total NAS \<= 3, with a steatosis subscore \<= 1, while maintaining no increase in subscores for hepatocyte ballooning or lobular inflammation, and no worsening of liver fibrosis.
Time frame: From randomization (Week 0) up to Week 12
Proportion of Participants Achieving Improvement of Hepatic Steatosis Without Worsening of MASLD (IOS)
Percentage of participants achieving steatosis improvement evaluated by liver biopsy. It is defined as a decrease in the total NAS by \>= 1 and a NAS steatosis subscore \<= 1, while maintaining no increase in total NAS, hepatocyte ballooning, or lobular inflammation subscores, and no worsening of liver fibrosis.
Time frame: From randomization (Week 0) up to Week 12
Proportion of Participants Successfully Completing Liver Donation (SCD)
Percentage of participants who successfully fulfill the clinical criteria for living donor liver transplantation and complete the liver procurement surgery.
Time frame: From randomization (Week 0) up to Week 24
Percentage Change from Baseline in Body Weight
Relative change in body weight measured in percentage using calibrated electronic scales under fasting conditions.
Time frame: From randomization (Week 0) up to Week 12
Percentage Change from Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Relative change in BMI calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.
Time frame: From randomization (Week 0) up to Week 12
Percentage Change from Baseline in Body Fat Percentage
Relative change in body fat percentage evaluated using the Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) method.
Time frame: From randomization (Week 0) up to Week 12
Percentage Change from Baseline in Visceral Fat Content
Relative change in visceral fat volume and content quantitatively assessed via abdominal MRI scans.
Time frame: From randomization (Week 0) up to Week 12
Daily Net Energy Intake During the Treatment Period
Daily net energy intake calculated based on the total daily energy expenditure estimated by smart fitness trackers minus the daily dietary calorie intake self-reported via electronic questionnaires.
Time frame: From randomization (Week 0) up to Week 12
Time to Ultrasound-Assessed Hepatic Steatosis Improvement
The number of days from randomization to the first documentation of hepatic steatosis improvement, defined as a CAP score \< 268 dB/m via regular FibroScan® assessments.
Time frame: From randomization (Week 0) up to Week 12
Time to Successful Liver Donation
The number of days from randomization to the date of the successful liver procurement surgery.
Time frame: From randomization (Week 0) up to Week 24
Change from Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Score
Change in patient-reported quality of life assessed using the validated Chinese version of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Total scores range from 0 to 100 for each subscale, with higher scores representing better health status and quality of life.
Time frame: From randomization (Week 0) up to Week 12
Peak Serum AST and ALT Levels Post-Hepatectomy
The maximum serum concentration values of AST and ALT recorded during the donor's post-operative hospitalization period.
Time frame: From liver procurement surgery up to post-operative Week 2
Time to Serum TBil Normalization Post-Hepatectomy
The number of days from the liver procurement surgery until the serum total bilirubin level drops back to the normal reference range, defined as \<= 17.1 μmol/L (1 mg/dL).
Time frame: From liver procurement surgery up to post-operative Week 2
Time to INR Normalization Post-Hepatectomy
The number of days from the liver procurement surgery until the international normalized ratio (INR) returns to the reference range of 0.8 to 1.5.
Time frame: From liver procurement surgery up to post-operative Week 2
Remnant Liver Volume After Liver Procurement Surgery
Absolute volume of the remnant liver measured in mL using multi-slice spiral abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scans.
Time frame: From liver procurement surgery up to post-operative Week 4
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.