The goal of this research study is to compare two different ways to increase lung cancer screening rates for tobacco quitline clients.
Primary Objective/Aim: Aim 1. Compare two dissemination strategies that vary in intensity on demand for LCS. We hypothesize that there will be a higher demand for LCS in the high-touch strategy arm compared to the low-touch strategy arm, as demonstrated by self-reported LCS completion, as well as scheduling a visit with a health care provider to discuss LCS. Secondary Objectives/Aim: Aim 2. Evaluate the impact on reach of the high-touch and low-touch strategies to disseminate LCS educational materials (i.e., view of the decision aid or participation in a decision coaching visit). We expect that disseminating the LCS educational materials through the high-touch strategy will result in higher reach than delivering the LCS educational materials through the low-touch strategy. Aim 3. Evaluate the financial sustainability and cost-effectiveness of the two approaches of disseminating LCS educational materials. We expect that the high-touch strategy will require a greater financial commitment and stronger partnerships between quitline service providers, state department of health, and health care systems, it will be a cost-effective dissemination strategy compared to the low-touch strategy (emailing/texting).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
650
Participants will receive the LCS educational materials, decision coaching call for the SDM visit, and navigation for LCS.
UT MD Anderson
Houston, Texas, United States
Safety and Adverse Events (AEs)
Incidence of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version (v) 6.0
Time frame: Through study completion; an average of 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.