This study evaluated whether a chemical skin biostimulator containing ammonium trichloroacetate, homocysteic acid, phytic acid and citric acid can improve signs of photoaged skin in women with mature skin. Twenty-five women received four treatment sessions two weeks apart, followed by a home-care skincare regimen. Skin firmness, wrinkles, skin texture, hydration, sebum production and, in participants with hyperpigmentation, skin tone uniformity were measured before treatment and at 2 and 12 weeks after the treatment series to determine whether the biostimulator produces lasting improvement in photoaged skin without the downtime associated with traditional chemical peels.
This was a single-arm, prospective, open-label study conducted at a single academic centre to assess the clinical and instrumental effects of a chemical skin biostimulator (PRX plus, WiQO, Trieste, Italy) on facial photoaging. The intervention combines ammonium trichloroacetate (ATCA), a controlled-penetration TCA derivative intended to stimulate dermal fibroblast activity and collagen remodelling, with homocysteic acid (HoA), a novel antioxidant and NMDA-receptor-modulating molecule proposed to influence keratinocyte differentiation, epidermal barrier function and melanocyte activity, together with low concentrations of phytic and citric acids providing mild keratolytic and antioxidant effects. Treatment consisted of a standardised four-session protocol (three product layers per session) applied to defined facial regions of interest, combined with a daytime regenerating cream, a nighttime glycolic-acid-containing fluid, and, in participants with hyperpigmentation, a twice-daily lightening serum. Outcomes were assessed instrumentally using Cutometer (skin viscoelasticity), Antera 3D (wrinkle volume and surface texture), corneometry and sebumetry (hydration and sebum), and grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) analysis of standardised cross-polarised photographs (skin tone homogeneity in the hyperpigmented subgroup), at baseline, 2 weeks after the final session, and 12 weeks after completion of the treatment series, to characterise both the immediate and sustained effects of the intervention.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
25
A four-session chemical skin biostimulation procedure using a topical formulation containing ammonium trichloroacetate (ATCA), homocysteic acid (HoA), phytic acid and citric acid (PRX plus, WiQO, Trieste, Italy). At each session, three product layers were applied to predefined facial areas (forehead, nose, cheeks, chin, upper lip) with massage until absorption, followed by cold-water rinse. Sessions were repeated at 14-day intervals. Participants additionally followed a standardised home-care regimen: a regenerating shea-butter cream each morning, a glycolic-acid-containing fluid each evening, and, for participants with hyperpigmentation, a lightening serum applied twice daily to affected areas, together with daily broad-spectrum sunscreen (SPF 50+).
Department of Practical Cosmetology and Skin Diagnostics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice
Sosnowiec, Poland
Change From Baseline in Skin Viscoelasticity (Cutometer R2, R5, R7)
Skin viscoelasticity assessed by Cutometer, reported as gross elasticity (R2), net elasticity (R5) and biological elasticity (R7); each is a dimensionless ratio ranging from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater skin elasticity.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series
Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Volume (Antera 3D)
Wrinkle volume at the nasolabial folds, glabellar lines, forehead lines, and crow's feet, measured in mm³ by Antera 3D three-dimensional imaging.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series
Change From Baseline in Skin Texture Score (Antera 3D)
A proprietary continuous index from the Antera 3D imaging software (Miravex) reflecting skin surface irregularity, with no manufacturer-published fixed range; observed values in this study ranged from approximately 20 to 55, with higher values indicating rougher skin.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series
Change From Baseline in Skin Roughness (Antera 3D, Ra)
Arithmetic roughness (Ra), measured in micrometres (µm) by Antera 3D.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series
Change From Baseline in Maximum Wrinkle Height (Antera 3D)
Maximum surface height of wrinkles, measured in millimetres (mm) by Antera 3D.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series
Change From Baseline in Skin Hydration
Skin hydration measured by corneometry (arbitrary corneometer units).
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series
Change From Baseline in Sebum Secretion
Sebum secretion measured by sebumetry.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series
Change From Baseline in Skin Tone Contrast (GLCM) in Participants With Hyperpigmentation
Grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) contrast index in the hyperpigmented subgroup (n=14), assessed from standardised cross-polarised photographs.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series
Change From Baseline in Skin Tone Homogeneity (GLCM) in Participants With Hyperpigmentation
Grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) homogeneity index (range 0-1; higher values indicate greater uniformity) in the hyperpigmented subgroup (n=14).
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 12 weeks after the treatment series
Change in Self-Assessed Facial Appearance, Neck Appearance, Wrinkle Depth, and Skin Firmness
Participants' perceived change in facial appearance, neck appearance, wrinkle depth, and skin firmness after the treatment series, each rated on a Likert scale from -5 (marked worsening) to +5 (marked improvement), with 0 indicating no change.
Time frame: Immediately after the fourth treatment session (each session is a single-day clinic visit; the four sessions were administered at 14-day intervals), compared with baseline
Satisfaction With Wrinkle-Reduction and Firming Effects
Participants' satisfaction with the wrinkle-reduction effect and with the firming effect of the treatment, each rated on a scale from 0 (not satisfied at all) to 10 (extremely satisfied).
Time frame: Immediately after the fourth treatment session (each session is a single-day clinic visit; the four sessions were administered at 14-day intervals)
Proportion of Participants Satisfied With Facial and Neck Appearance
Percentage of participants reporting satisfaction with the appearance of their face and neck, assessed before treatment and after the treatment series.
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the fourth treatment session (each session is a single-day clinic visit; the four sessions were administered at 14-day intervals)
Percentage Retention of Maximal Improvement in Wrinkle Volume and Skin Texture at 12 Weeks
Persistence of the treatment effect, calculated as the percentage of the maximal improvement (observed at 2 weeks) that was retained at 12 weeks, for wrinkle volume and skin texture/roughness parameters measured by Antera 3D.
Time frame: 2 weeks and 12 weeks after the treatment series
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.