Frontal vs Parietal Eminence Drainage for Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Overview

This clinical trial aims to find out whether the puncture site used during minimally invasive surgery with twist-drill puncture and closed-system drainage affects the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). The target population is adults with a unilateral chronic subdural hematoma who need surgical drainage based on their symptoms and imaging findings (CT/MRI). The main questions this study is designed to answer are: * Does the puncture site affect the risk of same-side cSDH recurrence requiring reoperation within 3 months * Does the puncture site affect recovery and key clinical outcomes after surgery (including functional status and postoperative recovery measures) There are two groups, researchers will compare: * Group A: patients receiving puncture at the frontal region vs. * Group B: patients receiving puncture near the parietal eminence to determine whether one puncture site leads to better outcomes than the other. Participants will: * undergo a surgical procedure where, based on random assignment, the puncture site is either frontal or near the parietal eminence; * receive closed-system drainage after a twist-drill puncture; * complete follow-up assessments at discharge, 30 days, 3 months after surgery, which will include symptom review and imaging (CT) evaluations to check hematoma changes and recurrence; * have safety monitoring throughout the study period to record any complications or adverse events.

This is a (multi-center) prospective, randomized, parallel-group, assessor-blinded clinical trial in eligible patients with unilateral chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) to compare the effects of puncture-site location on outcomes after minimally invasive drainage: participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to Group A (frontal twist-drill puncture drainage) or Group B (parietal eminence twist-drill puncture drainage), with both groups receiving standardized closed-system subdural drainage and postoperative management; random allocation will be concealed using a secure electronic randomization system or sealed opaque envelopes prepared by a researcher not involved in surgery or outcome assessment. The primary outcome is the rate of ipsilateral cSDH recurrence requiring reoperation within 3 months after surgery (recurrence defined as symptomatic re-accumulation or enlargement confirmed by imaging and judged by the treating team to require repeat intervention). Secondary outcomes include postoperative residual hematoma maximum thickness and volume at 24-48 hours, pneumocephalus volume at 24-48 hours, reduction in midline shift, brain re-expansion rate, drainage duration, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, Markwalder grading and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 30 days/3 months, and mortality at 30 days and 3 months; although surgeon blinding is not feasible, radiological and clinical outcome assessors and statisticians will be blinded whenever possible, with anonymized postoperative CT images assessed independently by trained reviewers.