This study aims to evaluate the impact of different discontinuation intervals of GLP-1 receptor agonists prior to colonoscopy on bowel preparation quality and the need for repeat colonoscopy, in order to establish appropriate discontinuation recommendations.
Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have become increasingly prevalent in modern clinical practice, extending their therapeutic roles beyond glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to encompass weight management, cardiovascular protection, and emerging indications in hepatic diseases. The growing adoption of GLP-1 RAs, including newer agents such as tirzepatide, has highlighted their beneficial effects on metabolic health. However, their pharmacological action of delaying gastric emptying and suppressing gastrointestinal motility has raised concerns regarding their potential impact on bowel preparation quality prior to colonoscopy. Colonoscopy remains a cornerstone modality for colorectal cancer screening and prevention, where high-quality bowel preparation is essential for adequate mucosal visualization and lesion detection. Inadequate bowel preparation not only compromises diagnostic accuracy but also increases the risk of missed lesions, procedural complications, and necessitates repeat examinations, leading to greater healthcare costs and patient burden. Current guidelines advocate split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based regimens as the standard for bowel cleansing; however, patient-related factors, including the use of medications that inhibit gastrointestinal motility, are recognized contributors to bowel preparation failure. GLP-1 RAs are classified as enterogastrones, exerting their effects via the ileal brake mechanism, which slows upper gastrointestinal transit in response to nutrient exposure. While this effect is therapeutically advantageous for glycemic control and weight reduction, it may inadvertently impair bowel cleansing efficacy. Preliminary evidence suggests that GLP-1 RA users are at higher risk of inadequate bowel preparation and repeat colonoscopy. Nonetheless, empirical data regarding optimal peri-procedural management, specifically the appropriate discontinuation interval of GLP-1 RAs prior to colonoscopy, remain scarce. Given the pharmacokinetic diversity of GLP-1 RAs and their prolonged half-lives, it is unclear how long prior to colonoscopy these agents should be withheld to mitigate their gastrointestinal motility-suppressing effects and reduce the likelihood of suboptimal bowel cleansing. The absence of evidence-based discontinuation guidelines for GLP-1 RAs in this setting represents an unmet clinical need. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between GLP-1 RA discontinuation intervals and bowel preparation adequacy, Using BBPS(Boston Bowel Preparation Scale) as a surrogate marker for inadequate bowel cleansing. By determining the optimal discontinuation timeframe for GLP-1 RAs, we seek to provide clinically actionable recommendations to optimize colonoscopy outcomes in this growing patient population.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
240
GLP-1 not stop for 1 week
GLP-1 stop for 1 week
FJUH
New Taipei, Taiwan, Taiwan
RECRUITING.Incomplete bowel preparation rate(IBP) through BBPS(Boston Bowel Preparation Scale)
Effect: Primary outcome: 1.Incomplete bowel preparation rate(IBP) through BBPS(Boston Bowel Preparation Scale) (Total BBPS score \< = 5 or score \<= 1 in any segment) Secondary outcomes: 1. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) 2. Detection rate number of advanced adenomas and colorectal serrated lesions 3. Time for scope insertion to cecum and withdrawal from the cecum to rectum. 4. Incidence of adverse events during colonoscopy 5. Weight gain or HSS was recorded after stopping GLP-1 and before colonoscopy
Time frame: "From enrollment to the end of Procedure and follow up for 30 days"
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.