The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) in patients with Spinocerebellar Ataxia (SCA) types 1 and 3. Primary Objective: The incidence and nature of treatment-related adverse events across the entire study, including serious treatment-related adverse events such as intracerebral hemorrhage, infection, and serious or unanticipated adverse device effects (SADEs and UADEs). Secondary/Exploratory Objectives: * Evaluation of the effect of Dentate Nucleus (DN) - Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). Ataxia severity will be quantified using the Scale of Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Ataxia (PROM-Ataxia), and kinematics. * To characterize electrophysiological activity across the cerebellothalamocorticomuscular (CTCM) network at rest and during motor behaviors. * To examine how DN-DBS modulates oscillatory activity and coupling across the CTCM circuit in relation to improvements in controlling ataxia.
People with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) face progressively disabling symptoms such as poor balance, frequent falls, and a loss of muscle control. Currently, there are no approved treatments for these symptoms. Developing medications to treat SCA is incredibly difficult because the brain's movement center-the cerebellum-has complex, damaged wiring that varies between patients. However, all signals from this complex brain region flow through a single exit point called the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN). This makes the DCN (specifically, the dentate nucleus or DN) a perfect target for brain stimulation. Over the past five years, animal studies have shown that using a device to stimulate this area (called deep brain stimulation, or DBS) can significantly improve movement control. Recently, a small study showed promising early results in humans, particularly in two patients with SCA type 3. To translate these findings into a standard treatment that has the potential to improve patients' lives, the investigators must first determine whether this is feasible and safe. The investigators will also need to see if this treatment works for different types of SCA, since cerebellar damage varies from person to person. Therefore, the aim of this study is to test and safety, feasibility, and early effectiveness of DBS on both sides of the brain in 12 people with SCA types 1 and 3. During the study, the investigators will use temporary external wires and a brain-recording device to listen to the brain's signals. By matching these signals with standard brain wave tests (EEGs), the investigators will hopefully understand exactly how this stimulation fixes the brain's movement network.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
12
The UG3NS140720 Deep Brain Stimulation System is primarily comprised of components from the Medtronic Percept™ system, which is approved in the U.S. by the FDA for unilateral or bilateral stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus as adjunctive therapy for ET, cerebellar outflow tremor, and MS-related tremor. This system is also approved to be used on patients with neurologic disorders such as Parkinson's disease, dystonia, or epilepsy. The FDA has not approved any DBS system for the stimulation of the Deep Cerebellar Nuclei (DCN) for this patient population. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) utilizes surgically implanted electrodes and a neurostimulator to deliver electrical energy to specific targeted structures deep within either one or both hemispheres of the brain.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Incidence of treatment-related adverse events
To further understand the safety and optimize a novel therapeutic target to achieve ataxia control for individuals with SCA. The adverse events will be evaluated and tallied if they met the criteria as Serious Adverse Events (SAE), Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADE), and Unanticipated (Serious) Adverse Device Effects (UADE).
Time frame: Up to 72 months
Mean Scale for Assessing and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) Score
To characterize the effect of DN-DBS on disease-related impairments, the study will measure ataxia severity as assessed by the Scale for Assessing and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). SARA is a clinical scale that includes 8 different domains of neurological exams, including gait, stance, sitting, speech, and hand dexterity. The total amount of points on SARA ranges from 0 (no ataxia) to 40 (most severe ataxia).
Time frame: Baseline, Month 11
Mean Patient-Reported Outcome Measures - Ataxia (PROM-Ataxia) Scale Score
To characterize the effect of DN DBS on ataxia severity and related cognitive and emotional symptoms in SCA, the study will utilize the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures - Ataxia (PROM-Ataxia) scale. PROM-Ataxia is a 3-domain, 70-item questionnaire which assesses the impact of cerebellar dysfunction on physical abilities, activities of daily living, and cognitive-emotional challenges. The maximum severity score on PROM-Ataxia is 280, where all 70 questions are scored on a 0-4 Likert scale. 0 represents never and 4 represents always.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 11
Mean Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale (CCAS) Score
SCA patients may have cognitive impairment, presumed to come from the dysfunctional cerebellum. Therefore, cognition status will be measured by the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale (CCAS). The CCAS evaluates multiple cognitive domains such as executive function, attention, memory, language, visual-spatial skills, abstract reasoning, and neuropsychiatric features. The total possible score is 120 points; the Pass / Fail measure provides a maximum fail score of 10 (i.e., 10 failed tests). A fail score of 0 is normal. In a patient with cerebellar disease, a fail score of 1 indicates Possible CCAS, a fail score of 2 indicates Probable CCAS, and a fail score of 3 or more indicates Definite CCAS.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 11
Mean Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score
To assess depression symptoms, the Patient Health Questionnaire assessment will be used. The PHQ is a 9-item patient-reported assessment which asks how often a patient has experienced a symptom in the prior 2 weeks. Responses range from "0" (Not at all) to "3" (nearly every day). Scores range from 0 to 27, with total scores over 10 indicating a presence of depression.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 11
Mean Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) Scale Score
To assess anxiety symptoms, the GAD scale will be used. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) scale is a 7-item patient-reported assessment which assesses how often a patient has experienced a symptom of anxiety in the last 2 weeks. To assess depression symptoms, the Patient Health Questionnaire assessment will be used. Responses range from "0" (Not at all) to "3" (nearly every day). Scores range from 0 to 21, with total scores over 10 indicating a presence of anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 11
Mean Patient Global Impression (PGI) Score
The Patient Global Impression (PGI) scores are single-item patient-reported assessments. This study will use the severity (PGI-S) and change (PGI-C) scores.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 11
Mean Gait Measure of Ataxia
Kinematic measures of ataxia will be measured by 6 wearable sensors from the APDM Mobility Lab System. The system has recently been validated to track cerebellar ataxia severity in SCA patients. SCA patients have increased postural sway, increased toe-out angle variability, and increased double-support time variability. APDM sensors will also be used to study different gait cycles and finger-to-target movements as indicators for gait and hand ataxia, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 11
Mean Postural Kinematic Measure of Ataxia
Kinematic measures of ataxia will be measured by 6 wearable sensors from the APDM Mobility Lab System. The system has recently been validated to track cerebellar ataxia severity in SCA patients. SCA patients have increased postural sway, increased toe-out angle variability, and increased double-support time variability. APDM sensors will also be used to study different gait cycles and finger-to-target movements as indicators for gait and hand ataxia, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 11
Mean EQ-5D-3L Score
The EQ-5D-3L is a self-assessed, health related, quality of life questionnaire. The scale measures quality of life on a 5-component scale including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 11
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.