The study aims to determine the effects of Oral Nutritional Supplement (ONS) added to usual care on body weight compared with usual care alone in community-dwelling adults aged 55 years and older who are at risk of malnutrition and have low muscle strength following acute care. Participants randomized to receive either ONS twice daily for 180 days plus usual care, or usual care alone. Usual care includes individualized dietary counseling and standardized physical activity advice provided. The study will assess body weight, nutritional status, muscle strength, physical function, dietary intake, and safety outcomes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
304
230 mL per serving, twice daily
Dietary counseling and physical activity advice
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Bangkok, Thailand
Phramongkutklao Hospital
Bangkok, Thailand
Siriraj Hospital
Bangkok, Thailand
Vajira Hospital
Bangkok, Thailand
Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Songklanagarind Hospital
Hat Yai, Thailand
Naresuan University Hospital
Phitsanulok, Thailand
Change in body weight
Measured in kg
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 180
Change in body weight
Measured in kg
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Body mass index (BMI)
Calculated as Weight (kg)/Height (m)2
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Calf circumference
Measured in cm
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC)
Measured in cm
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Body composition
Body composition variables assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), including appendicular skeletal muscle mass, lean mass, fat-free mass, fat mass, and derived indices.
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Nutrition Risk
Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002) is a clinical tool used to identify persons at risk of malnutrition. It classifies participants into one of the 2 categories: 1. Score of \< 3 = Low risk 2. Score of ≥ 3 = At nutritional risk
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Handgrip strength
Maximum handgrip strength assessed using the Jamar dynamometer.
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) total score
Short Physical Performance Battery total score ranges from 0 to 12; higher scores indicate better physical performance.
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) component scores
Balance, 4-meter gait speed, and chair stand component scores; higher scores indicate better performance.
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
4-meter gait speed
4-meter gait speed, measured in meters per second.
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Chair stand time
Chair stand time, measured in seconds.
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Energy, macronutrient and micronutrient intakes
24-Hour Dietary Recall: Researcher-led interview on food and drink intake the previous day. Nutrient analysis will be performed using a dietary analysis program.
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
Energy, macronutrient and micronutrient adequacy
Nutrient adequacy will be determined by comparing nutrient intakes (outcome No. 10) against sex- and age- specific local recommended nutrient intakes (RNI).
Time frame: Study Day 30, Study Day 90 and Study Day 180
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.