B cell (CD19) targeted chimeric antigen receptor modified T Cells (CAR-T) has transformed treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) or B-cell lymphoma (BCL). Because patients receiving CAR-T often present uncontrolled disease and have undergone several lines of treatment, they may be deeply immuno-depressed and prone to infections. Hypogammaglobulinemia were reported in 74% of patients preCAR-T cells infusion (Hill JA, et al. Blood Rev. 2019 Nov). CART cells also results in depletion of normal CD19+ B cells and hypogammaglobulinemia as an on-target, off tumor toxicity. Because CAR-T cells can persist for years, patients are exposed to infectious complications secondary to long-term Bcell aplasia and severe hypogammaglobulinemia (\<4g/l). Data from patients who received rituximab (CD20-specific monoclonal antibody) show that patients with severe hypogammaglobulinemia experienced recurrent bronchitis, sinusitis, pneumonia, and rarely, enteroviral meningoencephalitis. In patients receiving CAR T-cells, infection density is 0.55-0.67 infections/100 days3,5 at risk after the first month with a majority of respiratory and ENT (earsnose-throat) infections. To prevent infections, anti-bacterial prophylaxis (AP) based on local guidelines is often used in patients treated by CAR-T cells, with the risk of subsequent resistance. Otherwise, intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) is authorized by the French authorities for patients with secondary antibody deficiencies who developed severe or recurrent infections after appropriate antimicrobial therapy, if IgG levels \<4g/l. However, although IgRT as primary prophylaxis (PP) have no approval, they are used as PP after CAR T-cells by many centers, with no data supporting such a strategy. The benefit of IgRT over AP as a primary prophylaxis in the setting of CD19 CAR-T cells therapy should be demonstrated given its burden for patients and care, as well as its cost and the risk of Ig shortage. Therefore, this multi-centric prospective randomized openlabel study aims to assess the benefits of IgRT versus AP as PP in patients with secondary antibody deficiencies.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
228
IgRT 0.4g/Kg IV every 4 weeks for 12 months
PA following each center's guidelines, for 12 months
Occurrence of recurrent infections
Defined by at least 2 episodes requiring a curative systemic antibiotic treatment
Time frame: At 12 months
Occurrence of a severe infection
Defined by the need of hospitalization
Time frame: At 12 months
Cumulative hazard of severe infections
requiring hospitalization
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Infection-free survival rate
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Occurrence of COVID19 infection
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Cumulative incidence of readmissions due to infectious episode after hospital discharge following the infusion of CART cells
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Incidence of adverse events due to IgRT and/or PA
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Dosage of immune markers
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts, at lymphodepletion
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Dosage of immune markers
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
Time frame: At 1 month
Dosage of immune markers
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
Time frame: At 3 months
Dosage of immune markers
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
Time frame: At 6 months
Dosage of immune markers
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
Time frame: At 9 months
Dosage of immune markers
IgA, IgG, IgM, CD19/CD4/CD8 lymphocytes counts
Time frame: At 12 months
Quality of life assessment
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: At 3 months
Quality of life assessment
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: At 6 months
Quality of life assessment
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: At 9 months
Quality of life assessment
EQ5D5L : standardized measure of health-related quality of life assessing five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L index score typically ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health), depending on the country-specific value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: At 12 months
Quality of life assessment
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
Time frame: At 3 months
Quality of life assessment
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
Time frame: At 6 months
Quality of life assessment
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
Time frame: At 9 months
Quality of life assessment
EORTC QLQ-C30 : cancer-specific questionnaire designed to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale and the functional scales, higher scores indicate better quality of life and functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and poorer health status.
Time frame: At 12 months
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
Time frame: Up to 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.